Component
Monosodium L-glutamate
Context-specific entity; species, compartment and exposure are stated on each claim.
36 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.
How nutrients influence it
Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.
Other things that act on it
Enzymes, hormones, genes, and other components with a recorded effect. These are not nutrients, so they do not count toward the arrows above. Each finding names the chapter that recorded it.
How nutrients reach it in more than one step
Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.
Tracing routes…
What it does
Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.
What it acts on
A blinded crossover in twelve adults reporting MSG-associated asthma found no definite immediate or late asthmatic reaction to 1 g or 5 g MSG versus lactose placebo.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- Fasted capsule challenges with three control days and spirometry.
- limitations
- Small study; does not establish universal absence of reactions or identify an immune mechanism.
- nutrient_topic
- Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · Monosodium L-glutamate
- plain_language
- Time-matched baseline variation changed interpretation of a lung-function fall.
- primary_references
- The effects of monosodium glutamate in adults with asthma who perceive themselves to be monosodium glutamate-intolerant. · 1998 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9648703/ · DOI 10.1016/s0091-6749(98)70305-7
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): taste, gut sensing, exposure and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-20) · lines 274–280
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Fasted capsule challenges with three control days and spirometry. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## monosodium-glutamate-asthma-challenge Time-matched baseline variation changed interpretation of a lung-function fall. A blinded crossover in twelve adults reporting MSG-associated asthma found no definite immediate or late asthmatic reaction to 1 g or 5 g MSG versus lactose placebo. Model: Fasted capsule challenges with three control days and spirometry. Limitations: Small study; does not establish universal absence of reactions or identify an immune mechanism. Evidence access: Primary abstract The effects of monosodium glutamate in adults with asthma who perceive themselves to be monosodium glutamate-intolerant. · 1998 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9648703/ · DOI 10.1016/s0091-6749(98)70305-7
Complete structured claim and evidenceThe same study found no significant MSG effect for carbohydrate-rich liquid or water meals in nine men.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- Within-study meal comparisons.
- limitations
- Not a contradiction caused by different chemical identities.
- nutrient_topic
- Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · Monosodium L-glutamate
- plain_language
- The positive protein-meal result did not generalize to all liquids.
- primary_references
- Monosodium L-glutamate added to a high-energy, high-protein liquid diet promotes gastric emptying. · 2009 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19056566/ · DOI 10.3945/ajcn.2008.26180
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): taste, gut sensing, exposure and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-20) · lines 226–232
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Within-study meal comparisons. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## monosodium-glutamate-carbohydrate-emptying-null The positive protein-meal result did not generalize to all liquids. The same study found no significant MSG effect for carbohydrate-rich liquid or water meals in nine men. Model: Within-study meal comparisons. Limitations: Not a contradiction caused by different chemical identities. Evidence access: Primary abstract Monosodium L-glutamate added to a high-energy, high-protein liquid diet promotes gastric emptying. · 2009 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19056566/ · DOI 10.3945/ajcn.2008.26180
Complete structured claim and evidenceThe MSG-plus-carbohydrate condition had lower peak serum glucose than carbohydrate alone, 5.50 versus 7.69 mmol/L.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- Same nine-person acute study.
- limitations
- No diabetes-treatment efficacy or durable metabolic benefit was tested.
- nutrient_topic
- Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · Monosodium L-glutamate
- plain_language
- A measured glucose effect does not by itself reveal the enzyme responsible.
- primary_references
- Glutamate supplementation is associated with improved glucose metabolism following carbohydrate ingestion in healthy males. · 2013 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23750536/ · DOI 10.1017/S0007114513001633
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): taste, gut sensing, exposure and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-20) · lines 58–64
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Same nine-person acute study. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## monosodium-glutamate-glucose-response A measured glucose effect does not by itself reveal the enzyme responsible. The MSG-plus-carbohydrate condition had lower peak serum glucose than carbohydrate alone, 5.50 versus 7.69 mmol/L. Model: Same nine-person acute study. Limitations: No diabetes-treatment efficacy or durable metabolic benefit was tested. Evidence access: Primary abstract Glutamate supplementation is associated with improved glucose metabolism following carbohydrate ingestion in healthy males. · 2013 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23750536/ · DOI 10.1017/S0007114513001633
Complete structured claim and evidenceIn 130 self-reported MSG-reactive volunteers given 5 g without food, 50 responded to MSG only, 17 to placebo only and 19 to both.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- Multicenter blinded crossover; positive response required at least two listed symptoms within two hours.
- limitations
- Self-selected group and acute bolus; molecular cause was not identified.
- nutrient_topic
- Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · Monosodium L-glutamate
- plain_language
- The initial challenge showed more symptoms after MSG than placebo.
- primary_references
- Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-challenge evaluation of reported reactions to monosodium glutamate. · 2000 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11080723/ · DOI 10.1067/mai.2000.110794
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): taste, gut sensing, exposure and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-20) · lines 258–264
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Multicenter blinded crossover; positive response required at least two listed symptoms within two hours. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## monosodium-glutamate-initial-symptoms The initial challenge showed more symptoms after MSG than placebo. In 130 self-reported MSG-reactive volunteers given 5 g without food, 50 responded to MSG only, 17 to placebo only and 19 to both. Model: Multicenter blinded crossover; positive response required at least two listed symptoms within two hours. Limitations: Self-selected group and acute bolus; molecular cause was not identified. Evidence access: Primary abstract Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-challenge evaluation of reported reactions to monosodium glutamate. · 2000 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11080723/ · DOI 10.1067/mai.2000.110794
Complete structured claim and evidenceC-peptide-based insulin secretion did not differ on average: four participants increased and five decreased in the MSG-plus-carbohydrate condition.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- Same nine men; C-peptide interpretation.
- limitations
- This does not identify responder genotypes or a direct insulin-receptor target.
- nutrient_topic
- Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · Monosodium L-glutamate
- plain_language
- The average and individual responses tell different parts of the story.
- primary_references
- Glutamate supplementation is associated with improved glucose metabolism following carbohydrate ingestion in healthy males. · 2013 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23750536/ · DOI 10.1017/S0007114513001633
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): taste, gut sensing, exposure and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-20) · lines 66–72
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Same nine men; C-peptide interpretation. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## monosodium-glutamate-insulin-heterogeneity The average and individual responses tell different parts of the story. C-peptide-based insulin secretion did not differ on average: four participants increased and five decreased in the MSG-plus-carbohydrate condition. Model: Same nine men; C-peptide interpretation. Limitations: This does not identify responder genotypes or a direct insulin-receptor target. Evidence access: Primary abstract Glutamate supplementation is associated with improved glucose metabolism following carbohydrate ingestion in healthy males. · 2013 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23750536/ · DOI 10.1017/S0007114513001633
Complete structured claim and evidenceEight participants had faster emptying with MSG; two slowed. Duodenal wall-motion analysis in four of the eight showed increased motility.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Primary full text; results and disclosures
- experimental_model
- Same ten-person MRI experiment; subgroup analyses.
- limitations
- Responder selection and small analyzable subset limit inference. Paper reports umami-research funding and software-company author affiliations.
- nutrient_topic
- Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · Monosodium L-glutamate
- plain_language
- A selected subgroup can suggest a mechanism without establishing a population effect.
- primary_references
- Gastric emptying and duodenal motility upon intake of a liquid meal with monosodium glutamate in healthy subjects. · 2014 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24744869/ · DOI 10.1002/phy2.187
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): taste, gut sensing, exposure and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-20) · lines 242–248
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Same ten-person MRI experiment; subgroup analyses. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## monosodium-glutamate-mri-responder-analysis A selected subgroup can suggest a mechanism without establishing a population effect. Eight participants had faster emptying with MSG; two slowed. Duodenal wall-motion analysis in four of the eight showed increased motility. Model: Same ten-person MRI experiment; subgroup analyses. Limitations: Responder selection and small analyzable subset limit inference. Paper reports umami-research funding and software-company author affiliations. Evidence access: Primary full text; results and disclosures Gastric emptying and duodenal motility upon intake of a liquid meal with monosodium glutamate in healthy subjects. · 2014 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24744869/ · DOI 10.1002/phy2.187
Complete structured claim and evidenceIn ten men, 60-minute gastric residual volume did not differ significantly between mixed liquid meals with and without 0.5% MSG, P=0.45.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Primary full text; results
- experimental_model
- 200 kcal/200 mL meal; serial MRI.
- limitations
- Different meal and measurement from the breath-test study.
- nutrient_topic
- Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · Monosodium L-glutamate
- plain_language
- The whole-cohort test must stay visible.
- primary_references
- Gastric emptying and duodenal motility upon intake of a liquid meal with monosodium glutamate in healthy subjects. · 2014 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24744869/ · DOI 10.1002/phy2.187
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): taste, gut sensing, exposure and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-20) · lines 234–240
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · 200 kcal/200 mL meal; serial MRI. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## monosodium-glutamate-mri-whole-cohort The whole-cohort test must stay visible. In ten men, 60-minute gastric residual volume did not differ significantly between mixed liquid meals with and without 0.5% MSG, P=0.45. Model: 200 kcal/200 mL meal; serial MRI. Limitations: Different meal and measurement from the breath-test study. Evidence access: Primary full text; results Gastric emptying and duodenal motility upon intake of a liquid meal with monosodium glutamate in healthy subjects. · 2014 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24744869/ · DOI 10.1002/phy2.187
Complete structured claim and evidenceMSG shortened the estimated half-emptying time of a protein-rich liquid meal in ten healthy men.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- 13C-acetate breath-test study; 0.5% MSG.
- limitations
- Indirect emptying estimate; the study does not establish receptor mediation or treatment of gastroparesis.
- nutrient_topic
- Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · Monosodium L-glutamate
- plain_language
- A local digestive response depends on the accompanying food.
- primary_references
- Monosodium L-glutamate added to a high-energy, high-protein liquid diet promotes gastric emptying. · 2009 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19056566/ · DOI 10.3945/ajcn.2008.26180
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): taste, gut sensing, exposure and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-20) · lines 218–224
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · 13C-acetate breath-test study; 0.5% MSG. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## monosodium-glutamate-protein-emptying A local digestive response depends on the accompanying food. MSG shortened the estimated half-emptying time of a protein-rich liquid meal in ten healthy men. Model: 13C-acetate breath-test study; 0.5% MSG. Limitations: Indirect emptying estimate; the study does not establish receptor mediation or treatment of gastroparesis. Evidence access: Primary abstract Monosodium L-glutamate added to a high-energy, high-protein liquid diet promotes gastric emptying. · 2009 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19056566/ · DOI 10.3945/ajcn.2008.26180
Complete structured claim and evidenceErythrocyte glutamate and aspartate concentrations did not change in either arm of the eight-person MSG/carbohydrate experiment.
Experimental context and source evidence
- availability_state
- biomarker_context Imported condition classification; unverified.
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- 150 mg/kg MSG with or without hydrolyzed corn starch.
- limitations
- Other cells and later times were not established by this result.
- nutrient_topic
- Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · Monosodium L-glutamate
- plain_language
- A plasma change did not imply the same change in red cells.
- primary_references
- Effect of carbohydrate on plasma and erythrocyte glutamate levels in humans ingesting large doses of monosodium L-glutamate in water. · 1983 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6133445/ · DOI 10.1093/ajcn/37.6.961
- trigger_kind
- biomarker_context Imported condition classification; unverified.
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): taste, gut sensing, exposure and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-20) · lines 34–40
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · 150 mg/kg MSG with or without hydrolyzed corn starch. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## monosodium-glutamate-red-cell-compartment A plasma change did not imply the same change in red cells. Erythrocyte glutamate and aspartate concentrations did not change in either arm of the eight-person MSG/carbohydrate experiment. Model: 150 mg/kg MSG with or without hydrolyzed corn starch. Limitations: Other cells and later times were not established by this result. Evidence access: Primary abstract Effect of carbohydrate on plasma and erythrocyte glutamate levels in humans ingesting large doses of monosodium L-glutamate in water. · 1983 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6133445/ · DOI 10.1093/ajcn/37.6.961
Complete structured claim and evidenceRepeated challenges did not establish consistent individual symptom patterns; the two final participants each reacted to only one of three MSG-with-food challenges.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- Sequential retesting in the same study.
- limitations
- Only two people reached the food protocol, so it is not a large general test of all meals.
- nutrient_topic
- Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · Monosodium L-glutamate
- plain_language
- An initial response and a reproducible sensitivity are different findings.
- primary_references
- Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-challenge evaluation of reported reactions to monosodium glutamate. · 2000 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11080723/ · DOI 10.1067/mai.2000.110794
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): taste, gut sensing, exposure and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-20) · lines 266–272
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Sequential retesting in the same study. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## monosodium-glutamate-retest-inconsistency An initial response and a reproducible sensitivity are different findings. Repeated challenges did not establish consistent individual symptom patterns; the two final participants each reacted to only one of three MSG-with-food challenges. Model: Sequential retesting in the same study. Limitations: Only two people reached the food protocol, so it is not a large general test of all meals. Evidence access: Primary abstract Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-challenge evaluation of reported reactions to monosodium glutamate. · 2000 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11080723/ · DOI 10.1067/mai.2000.110794
Complete structured claim and evidenceMSG is the sodium salt of L-glutamate; the sensory study treats added MSG and NaCl as separate ingredients.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Primary full text; background and test samples
- experimental_model
- Chemical identity and ingredient design in the primary sensory study.
- limitations
- This is background chemistry, not a measurement of absorption or tissue delivery.
- nutrient_topic
- Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · Monosodium L-glutamate
- plain_language
- The ingredient contributes both glutamate and sodium.
- primary_references
- Validation of preferred salt concentration in soup based on a randomized blinded experiment in multiple regions in Japan-influence of umami (L-glutamate) on saltiness and palatability of low-salt solutions. · 2020 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31996813/ · DOI 10.1038/s41440-020-0397-1
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): taste, gut sensing, exposure and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-20) · lines 18–24
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Chemical identity and ingredient design in the primary sensory study. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## monosodium-glutamate-salt-identity The ingredient contributes both glutamate and sodium. MSG is the sodium salt of L-glutamate; the sensory study treats added MSG and NaCl as separate ingredients. Model: Chemical identity and ingredient design in the primary sensory study. Limitations: This is background chemistry, not a measurement of absorption or tissue delivery. Evidence access: Primary full text; background and test samples Validation of preferred salt concentration in soup based on a randomized blinded experiment in multiple regions in Japan-influence of umami (L-glutamate) on saltiness and palatability of low-salt solutions. · 2020 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31996813/ · DOI 10.1038/s41440-020-0397-1
Complete structured claim and evidenceIn 584 participants, adding 0.3% MSG improved palatability ratings at tested 0.3%, 0.6% and 0.9% NaCl concentrations.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Primary full text
- experimental_model
- Randomized blinded tasting across nineteen Japanese regions.
- limitations
- MSG itself adds sodium; net reduction requires NaCl replacement. No long-term sodium intake or blood-pressure effect was measured. Three authors were Ajinomoto employees.
- nutrient_topic
- Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · Monosodium L-glutamate
- plain_language
- Flavor enhancement may help a lower-salt recipe remain acceptable.
- primary_references
- Validation of preferred salt concentration in soup based on a randomized blinded experiment in multiple regions in Japan-influence of umami (L-glutamate) on saltiness and palatability of low-salt solutions. · 2020 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31996813/ · DOI 10.1038/s41440-020-0397-1
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): taste, gut sensing, exposure and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-20) · lines 250–256
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Randomized blinded tasting across nineteen Japanese regions. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## monosodium-glutamate-sodium-substitution Flavor enhancement may help a lower-salt recipe remain acceptable. In 584 participants, adding 0.3% MSG improved palatability ratings at tested 0.3%, 0.6% and 0.9% NaCl concentrations. Model: Randomized blinded tasting across nineteen Japanese regions. Limitations: MSG itself adds sodium; net reduction requires NaCl replacement. No long-term sodium intake or blood-pressure effect was measured. Three authors were Ajinomoto employees. Evidence access: Primary full text Validation of preferred salt concentration in soup based on a randomized blinded experiment in multiple regions in Japan-influence of umami (L-glutamate) on saltiness and palatability of low-salt solutions. · 2020 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31996813/ · DOI 10.1038/s41440-020-0397-1
Complete structured claim and evidenceNine men received 150 mg/kg MSG capsules 30 minutes before a drink; plasma glutamate rose about tenfold without carbohydrate and sixfold with a 75 g carbohydrate drink.
Experimental context and source evidence
- availability_state
- biomarker_context Imported condition classification; unverified.
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- Four-condition human acute supplementation experiment.
- limitations
- A high-dose loading protocol does not describe customary MSG use.
- nutrient_topic
- Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · Monosodium L-glutamate
- plain_language
- Timing between amino acid and carbohydrate also matters.
- primary_references
- Glutamate supplementation is associated with improved glucose metabolism following carbohydrate ingestion in healthy males. · 2013 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23750536/ · DOI 10.1017/S0007114513001633
- trigger_kind
- biomarker_context Imported condition classification; unverified.
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): taste, gut sensing, exposure and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-20) · lines 50–56
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Four-condition human acute supplementation experiment. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## monosodium-glutamate-staggered-exposure Timing between amino acid and carbohydrate also matters. Nine men received 150 mg/kg MSG capsules 30 minutes before a drink; plasma glutamate rose about tenfold without carbohydrate and sixfold with a 75 g carbohydrate drink. Model: Four-condition human acute supplementation experiment. Limitations: A high-dose loading protocol does not describe customary MSG use. Evidence access: Primary abstract Glutamate supplementation is associated with improved glucose metabolism following carbohydrate ingestion in healthy males. · 2013 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23750536/ · DOI 10.1017/S0007114513001633
Complete structured claim and evidenceIntragastric 150 mM MSG increased gastric vagal afferent discharge in anesthetized rats.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Primary full text
- experimental_model
- Anesthetized rats; 2 mL intragastric infusion at 1 mL/min, nerve discharge assessed after infusion.
- limitations
- MSG was the exposure; human food intake and subjective effects were not tested.
- nutrient_topic
- L-Glutamate collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · L-Glutamate
- plain_language
- Glutamate in the stomach can signal through nerves without first acting at a brain glutamate receptor.
- primary_references
- Effects of intragastric infusion of inosine monophosphate and L: -glutamate on vagal gastric afferent activity and subsequent autonomic reflexes. · 2011 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21132420/ · DOI 10.1007/s12576-010-0121-z
L-Glutamate / L-glutamic acid: carbon and nitrogen allocation, signaling and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-19) · lines 66–72
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Anesthetized rats; 2 mL intragastric infusion at 1 mL/min, nerve discharge assessed after infusion. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## glutamate-gastric-vagal Glutamate in the stomach can signal through nerves without first acting at a brain glutamate receptor. Intragastric 150 mM MSG increased gastric vagal afferent discharge in anesthetized rats. Model: Anesthetized rats; 2 mL intragastric infusion at 1 mL/min, nerve discharge assessed after infusion. Limitations: MSG was the exposure; human food intake and subjective effects were not tested. Evidence access: Primary full text Effects of intragastric infusion of inosine monophosphate and L: -glutamate on vagal gastric afferent activity and subsequent autonomic reflexes. · 2011 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21132420/ · DOI 10.1007/s12576-010-0121-z
Complete structured claim and evidenceCoapplied MSG attenuated the sucrose-evoked calcium response in cells expressing human TAS1R2/TAS1R3.
Experimental context and source evidence
- dose
- Sucrose concentration series up to 150 mM; MSG or Glu-Glu/Glu-Asp concentration series; mutant imaging used 100 mM sucrose with 1 mM Glu-Glu or 50 mM MSG
- duration
- 120-second fluorescence acquisition; imaging at 30 seconds
- evidence_access
- Primary full-text methods/results and metadata inspected.
- evidence_scope
- literature_reviewed; source-specific curation
- experimental_model
- Human TAS1R2/TAS1R3 in Flp-In 293 cells
- exposure_scope
- Nutrient and peptide modulation of human sweet receptor
- limitations
- Cellular response, not a direct binding assay or a demonstration that every food tastes less sweet. pH/osmolarity controls and agonist-specific responses limit interpretation. Doses differ among panels.
- nutrient_topic
- Sucrose chapter; direct sucrose observations are distinguished from shared component metabolism. · Sucrose
- organism
- Human TAS1R2/TAS1R3 in Flp-In 293 cells
- plain_language
- Coapplied MSG attenuated the sucrose-evoked calcium response in cells expressing human TAS1R2/TAS1R3.
- primary_references
- Modulation of sweet taste by umami compounds via sweet taste receptor subunit hT1R2. (2015). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25853419/ DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124030
- route
- In vitro coapplication
- tissue
- Sweet-receptor calcium signaling
Sucrose: mechanism of action and metabolic impact (2026-09-20) · lines 79–89
Original AI-assisted source-specific sucrose curation with shared canonical claims retained by identity. Primary-study citations, negative findings, exposure details and limitations preserved. Not publisher full text. · supports · Human TAS1R2/TAS1R3 in Flp-In 293 cells · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## sucrose-msg-receptor Coapplied MSG attenuated the sucrose-evoked calcium response in cells expressing human TAS1R2/TAS1R3. Model/species: Human TAS1R2/TAS1R3 in Flp-In 293 cells Tissue: Sweet-receptor calcium signaling Exposure: Sucrose concentration series up to 150 mM; MSG or Glu-Glu/Glu-Asp concentration series; mutant imaging used 100 mM sucrose with 1 mM Glu-Glu or 50 mM MSG Route: In vitro coapplication Duration: 120-second fluorescence acquisition; imaging at 30 seconds Exposure scope: Nutrient and peptide modulation of human sweet receptor Limits: Cellular response, not a direct binding assay or a demonstration that every food tastes less sweet. pH/osmolarity controls and agonist-specific responses limit interpretation. Doses differ among panels. Reference: Modulation of sweet taste by umami compounds via sweet taste receptor subunit hT1R2. (2015). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25853419/ DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124030 Access: Primary full-text methods/results and metadata inspected.
Complete structured claim and evidence
Where it participates (unsigned role)
Blocking 5-HT3 receptors prevented the rat gastric vagal response to luminal glutamate.
Experimental context and source evidence
- availability_state
- machinery_impairment Imported condition classification; unverified.
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- Rat pharmacological blockade.
- limitations
- Subunits and an exclusive linear pathway are not established by the accessed abstract.
- nutrient_topic
- Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · Monosodium L-glutamate
- plain_language
- A serotonin receptor relays part of the gut signal.
- primary_references
- Luminal amino acid sensing in the rat gastric mucosa. · 2006 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16809638/ · DOI 10.1152/ajpgi.00587.2005
- trigger_kind
- machinery_impairment Imported condition classification; unverified.
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): taste, gut sensing, exposure and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-20) · lines 162–168
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Rat pharmacological blockade. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## monosodium-glutamate-5ht3-gate A serotonin receptor relays part of the gut signal. Blocking 5-HT3 receptors prevented the rat gastric vagal response to luminal glutamate. Model: Rat pharmacological blockade. Limitations: Subunits and an exclusive linear pathway are not established by the accessed abstract. Evidence access: Primary abstract Luminal amino acid sensing in the rat gastric mucosa. · 2006 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16809638/ · DOI 10.1152/ajpgi.00587.2005
Complete structured claim and evidenceCalhm1 knockout reduced taste-evoked ATP release without eliminating taste-cell excitability to the stimuli.
Experimental context and source evidence
- availability_state
- machinery_impairment Imported condition classification; unverified.
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- Mouse taste-bud knockout physiology.
- limitations
- The later CALHM3 work refines the channel composition; CALHM1 is not treated as the sole physiological subunit.
- nutrient_topic
- Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · Monosodium L-glutamate
- plain_language
- A cell can detect a stimulus yet fail to transmit its message.
- primary_references
- CALHM1 ion channel mediates purinergic neurotransmission of sweet, bitter and umami tastes. · 2013 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23467090/ · DOI 10.1038/nature11906
- trigger_kind
- machinery_impairment Imported condition classification; unverified.
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): taste, gut sensing, exposure and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-20) · lines 114–120
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Mouse taste-bud knockout physiology. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## monosodium-glutamate-calhm1-release A cell can detect a stimulus yet fail to transmit its message. Calhm1 knockout reduced taste-evoked ATP release without eliminating taste-cell excitability to the stimuli. Model: Mouse taste-bud knockout physiology. Limitations: The later CALHM3 work refines the channel composition; CALHM1 is not treated as the sole physiological subunit. Evidence access: Primary abstract CALHM1 ion channel mediates purinergic neurotransmission of sweet, bitter and umami tastes. · 2013 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23467090/ · DOI 10.1038/nature11906
Complete structured claim and evidenceCALHM3 coassembly with CALHM1 conferred rapid voltage-dependent ATP-release-channel gating; the study connected this complex to type II taste-cell physiology.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- Heterologous channel experiments and mouse taste-cell physiology.
- limitations
- Functional coassembly is recorded without treating the historical proposed stoichiometry as a universal structural assignment.
- nutrient_topic
- Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · Monosodium L-glutamate
- plain_language
- Two separately stored subunits form the output channel.
- primary_references
- CALHM3 Is Essential for Rapid Ion Channel-Mediated Purinergic Neurotransmission of GPCR-Mediated Tastes. · 2018 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29681531/ · DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.03.043
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): taste, gut sensing, exposure and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-20) · lines 122–128
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Heterologous channel experiments and mouse taste-cell physiology. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## monosodium-glutamate-calhm3-channel Two separately stored subunits form the output channel. CALHM3 coassembly with CALHM1 conferred rapid voltage-dependent ATP-release-channel gating; the study connected this complex to type II taste-cell physiology. Model: Heterologous channel experiments and mouse taste-cell physiology. Limitations: Functional coassembly is recorded without treating the historical proposed stoichiometry as a universal structural assignment. Evidence access: Primary abstract CALHM3 Is Essential for Rapid Ion Channel-Mediated Purinergic Neurotransmission of GPCR-Mediated Tastes. · 2018 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29681531/ · DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.03.043
Complete structured claim and evidenceCalhm3 deletion abolished taste-evoked ATP release and disrupted GPCR-mediated taste perception in mice.
Experimental context and source evidence
- availability_state
- machinery_impairment Imported condition classification; unverified.
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- Mouse knockout experiments.
- limitations
- Shares investigators with the CALHM1 study; no human deficiency threshold follows.
- nutrient_topic
- Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · Monosodium L-glutamate
- plain_language
- Intact upstream sensing cannot compensate for a missing release channel.
- primary_references
- CALHM3 Is Essential for Rapid Ion Channel-Mediated Purinergic Neurotransmission of GPCR-Mediated Tastes. · 2018 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29681531/ · DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.03.043
- trigger_kind
- machinery_impairment Imported condition classification; unverified.
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): taste, gut sensing, exposure and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-20) · lines 130–136
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Mouse knockout experiments. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## monosodium-glutamate-calhm3-loss Intact upstream sensing cannot compensate for a missing release channel. Calhm3 deletion abolished taste-evoked ATP release and disrupted GPCR-mediated taste perception in mice. Model: Mouse knockout experiments. Limitations: Shares investigators with the CALHM1 study; no human deficiency threshold follows. Evidence access: Primary abstract CALHM3 Is Essential for Rapid Ion Channel-Mediated Purinergic Neurotransmission of GPCR-Mediated Tastes. · 2018 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29681531/ · DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.03.043
Complete structured claim and evidenceIn eight adults receiving 150 mg/kg MSG in water, adding 1.1 g/kg hydrolyzed corn starch lowered mean peak plasma glutamate from 59.4 to 7.18 micromol/dL.
Experimental context and source evidence
- availability_state
- biomarker_context Imported condition classification; unverified.
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- Human high-dose oral loading, with versus without carbohydrate.
- limitations
- Small acute study; not a fixed conversion fraction for foods or a brain measurement.
- nutrient_topic
- Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · Monosodium L-glutamate
- plain_language
- Carbohydrate changed how much glutamate appeared in blood.
- primary_references
- Effect of carbohydrate on plasma and erythrocyte glutamate levels in humans ingesting large doses of monosodium L-glutamate in water. · 1983 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6133445/ · DOI 10.1093/ajcn/37.6.961
- trigger_kind
- biomarker_context Imported condition classification; unverified.
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): taste, gut sensing, exposure and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-20) · lines 26–32
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Human high-dose oral loading, with versus without carbohydrate. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## monosodium-glutamate-carbohydrate-exposure Carbohydrate changed how much glutamate appeared in blood. In eight adults receiving 150 mg/kg MSG in water, adding 1.1 g/kg hydrolyzed corn starch lowered mean peak plasma glutamate from 59.4 to 7.18 micromol/dL. Model: Human high-dose oral loading, with versus without carbohydrate. Limitations: Small acute study; not a fixed conversion fraction for foods or a brain measurement. Evidence access: Primary abstract Effect of carbohydrate on plasma and erythrocyte glutamate levels in humans ingesting large doses of monosodium L-glutamate in water. · 1983 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6133445/ · DOI 10.1093/ajcn/37.6.961
Complete structured claim and evidenceRestoring Plcb2 only in bitter-receptor cells rescued bitter responses but not sweet or amino-acid responses.
Experimental context and source evidence
- availability_state
- machinery_impairment Imported condition classification; unverified.
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- Transgenic rescue in Plcb2-deficient mice.
- limitations
- This defines cell-specific routing in the model, not a nutritional intervention.
- nutrient_topic
- Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · Monosodium L-glutamate
- plain_language
- Putting back machinery in the wrong cell type does not restore every signal.
- primary_references
- Coding of sweet, bitter, and umami tastes: different receptor cells sharing similar signaling pathways. · 2003 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12581520/ · DOI 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00071-0
- trigger_kind
- machinery_impairment Imported condition classification; unverified.
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): taste, gut sensing, exposure and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-20) · lines 106–112
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Transgenic rescue in Plcb2-deficient mice. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## monosodium-glutamate-cell-specific-rescue Putting back machinery in the wrong cell type does not restore every signal. Restoring Plcb2 only in bitter-receptor cells rescued bitter responses but not sweet or amino-acid responses. Model: Transgenic rescue in Plcb2-deficient mice. Limitations: This defines cell-specific routing in the model, not a nutritional intervention. Evidence access: Primary abstract Coding of sweet, bitter, and umami tastes: different receptor cells sharing similar signaling pathways. · 2003 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12581520/ · DOI 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00071-0
Complete structured claim and evidenceIndomethacin or capsaicin pretreatment reduced glutamate-associated mucus and pH responses.
Experimental context and source evidence
- availability_state
- machinery_impairment Imported condition classification; unverified.
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- Rat pharmacological perturbations.
- limitations
- No human food–drug interaction magnitude was tested.
- nutrient_topic
- Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · Monosodium L-glutamate
- plain_language
- Mediator synthesis and afferent function constrain the response.
- primary_references
- Luminal L-glutamate enhances duodenal mucosal defense mechanisms via multiple glutamate receptors in rats. · 2009 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19643955/ · DOI 10.1152/ajpgi.90605.2008
- trigger_kind
- machinery_impairment Imported condition classification; unverified.
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): taste, gut sensing, exposure and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-20) · lines 210–216
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Rat pharmacological perturbations. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## monosodium-glutamate-duodenal-cox-gate Mediator synthesis and afferent function constrain the response. Indomethacin or capsaicin pretreatment reduced glutamate-associated mucus and pH responses. Model: Rat pharmacological perturbations. Limitations: No human food–drug interaction magnitude was tested. Evidence access: Primary abstract Luminal L-glutamate enhances duodenal mucosal defense mechanisms via multiple glutamate receptors in rats. · 2009 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19643955/ · DOI 10.1152/ajpgi.90605.2008
Complete structured claim and evidencemGluR4 agonists mimicked and an antagonist inhibited glutamate-associated pH and mucus responses.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- Rat duodenum pharmacology.
- limitations
- Not a genetic demonstration of exclusive receptor mediation.
- nutrient_topic
- Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · Monosodium L-glutamate
- plain_language
- Receptor probes help locate a step.
- primary_references
- Luminal L-glutamate enhances duodenal mucosal defense mechanisms via multiple glutamate receptors in rats. · 2009 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19643955/ · DOI 10.1152/ajpgi.90605.2008
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): taste, gut sensing, exposure and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-20) · lines 194–200
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Rat duodenum pharmacology. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## monosodium-glutamate-duodenal-grm4 Receptor probes help locate a step. mGluR4 agonists mimicked and an antagonist inhibited glutamate-associated pH and mucus responses. Model: Rat duodenum pharmacology. Limitations: Not a genetic demonstration of exclusive receptor mediation. Evidence access: Primary abstract Luminal L-glutamate enhances duodenal mucosal defense mechanisms via multiple glutamate receptors in rats. · 2009 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19643955/ · DOI 10.1152/ajpgi.90605.2008
Complete structured claim and evidenceGlutamate plus IMP enhanced bicarbonate secretion in rat duodenum.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- Rat perfusion; IMP 0.1 mM.
- limitations
- T1R involvement was inferred; not proved by receptor deletion.
- nutrient_topic
- Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · Monosodium L-glutamate
- plain_language
- The two-compound interaction also reached a gut endpoint.
- primary_references
- Luminal L-glutamate enhances duodenal mucosal defense mechanisms via multiple glutamate receptors in rats. · 2009 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19643955/ · DOI 10.1152/ajpgi.90605.2008
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): taste, gut sensing, exposure and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-20) · lines 202–208
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Rat perfusion; IMP 0.1 mM. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## monosodium-glutamate-duodenal-imp The two-compound interaction also reached a gut endpoint. Glutamate plus IMP enhanced bicarbonate secretion in rat duodenum. Model: Rat perfusion; IMP 0.1 mM. Limitations: T1R involvement was inferred; not proved by receptor deletion. Evidence access: Primary abstract Luminal L-glutamate enhances duodenal mucosal defense mechanisms via multiple glutamate receptors in rats. · 2009 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19643955/ · DOI 10.1152/ajpgi.90605.2008
Complete structured claim and evidenceGlutamate increased rat duodenal mucus thickness without increasing measured blood flow.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- Same rat perfusion study.
- limitations
- Not clinical ulcer prevention.
- nutrient_topic
- Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · Monosodium L-glutamate
- plain_language
- Barrier and vascular endpoints differed.
- primary_references
- Luminal L-glutamate enhances duodenal mucosal defense mechanisms via multiple glutamate receptors in rats. · 2009 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19643955/ · DOI 10.1152/ajpgi.90605.2008
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): taste, gut sensing, exposure and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-20) · lines 186–192
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Same rat perfusion study. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## monosodium-glutamate-duodenal-mucus Barrier and vascular endpoints differed. Glutamate increased rat duodenal mucus thickness without increasing measured blood flow. Model: Same rat perfusion study. Limitations: Not clinical ulcer prevention. Evidence access: Primary abstract Luminal L-glutamate enhances duodenal mucosal defense mechanisms via multiple glutamate receptors in rats. · 2009 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19643955/ · DOI 10.1152/ajpgi.90605.2008
Complete structured claim and evidenceLuminal L-glutamate increased epithelial pH in rat duodenum.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- Anesthetized-rat perfusion, 0.1–10 mM.
- limitations
- Local preparation; not blood alkalinization.
- nutrient_topic
- Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · Monosodium L-glutamate
- plain_language
- A luminal amino acid changed cellular acid-base handling.
- primary_references
- Luminal L-glutamate enhances duodenal mucosal defense mechanisms via multiple glutamate receptors in rats. · 2009 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19643955/ · DOI 10.1152/ajpgi.90605.2008
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): taste, gut sensing, exposure and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-20) · lines 178–184
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Anesthetized-rat perfusion, 0.1–10 mM. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## monosodium-glutamate-duodenal-ph A luminal amino acid changed cellular acid-base handling. Luminal L-glutamate increased epithelial pH in rat duodenum. Model: Anesthetized-rat perfusion, 0.1–10 mM. Limitations: Local preparation; not blood alkalinization. Evidence access: Primary abstract Luminal L-glutamate enhances duodenal mucosal defense mechanisms via multiple glutamate receptors in rats. · 2009 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19643955/ · DOI 10.1152/ajpgi.90605.2008
Complete structured claim and evidenceThe cooperative model places a 5-prime-ribonucleotide at an adjacent opening-side site, stabilizing the closed glutamate-bound receptor conformation.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- Same mutagenesis/chimera/model study.
- limitations
- Do not extrapolate taste synergy to a general systemic metabolic benefit.
- nutrient_topic
- Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · Monosodium L-glutamate
- plain_language
- IMP can amplify a glutamate signal through a different receptor contact.
- primary_references
- Molecular mechanism for the umami taste synergism. · 2008 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19104071/ · DOI 10.1073/pnas.0810174106
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): taste, gut sensing, exposure and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-20) · lines 82–88
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Same mutagenesis/chimera/model study. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## monosodium-glutamate-imp-cooperation IMP can amplify a glutamate signal through a different receptor contact. The cooperative model places a 5-prime-ribonucleotide at an adjacent opening-side site, stabilizing the closed glutamate-bound receptor conformation. Model: Same mutagenesis/chimera/model study. Limitations: Do not extrapolate taste synergy to a general systemic metabolic benefit. Evidence access: Primary abstract Molecular mechanism for the umami taste synergism. · 2008 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19104071/ · DOI 10.1073/pnas.0810174106
Complete structured claim and evidenceNOS inhibition blocked glutamate-evoked vagal firing; an NO donor mimicked firing and its response was blocked by 5-HT3 antagonism.
Experimental context and source evidence
- availability_state
- machinery_impairment Imported condition classification; unverified.
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- Rat mucosal pharmacology.
- limitations
- Supports pathway ordering; not direct proof of each cell source or a human MSG–arginine interaction.
- nutrient_topic
- Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · Monosodium L-glutamate
- plain_language
- Nitric oxide and serotonin signaling interact upstream of the nerve response.
- primary_references
- Luminal amino acid sensing in the rat gastric mucosa. · 2006 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16809638/ · DOI 10.1152/ajpgi.00587.2005
- trigger_kind
- machinery_impairment Imported condition classification; unverified.
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): taste, gut sensing, exposure and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-20) · lines 170–176
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Rat mucosal pharmacology. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## monosodium-glutamate-nos-gate Nitric oxide and serotonin signaling interact upstream of the nerve response. NOS inhibition blocked glutamate-evoked vagal firing; an NO donor mimicked firing and its response was blocked by 5-HT3 antagonism. Model: Rat mucosal pharmacology. Limitations: Supports pathway ordering; not direct proof of each cell source or a human MSG–arginine interaction. Evidence access: Primary abstract Luminal amino acid sensing in the rat gastric mucosa. · 2006 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16809638/ · DOI 10.1152/ajpgi.00587.2005
Complete structured claim and evidenceGlutamate taste with a consonant savory odor produced supralinear fMRI responses in medial orbitofrontal and pregenual cingulate regions, related to flavor pleasantness.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- Human sensory ratings and fMRI.
- limitations
- BOLD activation is not evidence that ingested glutamate crossed the blood-brain barrier.
- nutrient_topic
- Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · Monosodium L-glutamate
- plain_language
- Smell changes the perceived flavor through sensory convergence.
- primary_references
- Umami: a delicious flavor formed by convergence of taste and olfactory pathways in the human brain. · 2007 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17432971/ · DOI 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05445.x
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): taste, gut sensing, exposure and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-20) · lines 146–152
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Human sensory ratings and fMRI. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## monosodium-glutamate-odor-convergence Smell changes the perceived flavor through sensory convergence. Glutamate taste with a consonant savory odor produced supralinear fMRI responses in medial orbitofrontal and pregenual cingulate regions, related to flavor pleasantness. Model: Human sensory ratings and fMRI. Limitations: BOLD activation is not evidence that ingested glutamate crossed the blood-brain barrier. Evidence access: Primary abstract Umami: a delicious flavor formed by convergence of taste and olfactory pathways in the human brain. · 2007 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17432971/ · DOI 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05445.x
Complete structured claim and evidencePlcb2 knockout abolished tested sweet, amino-acid and bitter responses while sparing sour and salty responses in the reported mouse experiments.
Experimental context and source evidence
- availability_state
- machinery_impairment Imported condition classification; unverified.
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- Mouse knockout taste behavior and nerve assays.
- limitations
- Reported assay phenotype; not an MSG deficiency or a universal result at every stimulus concentration.
- nutrient_topic
- Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · Monosodium L-glutamate
- plain_language
- Recognizing the molecule requires downstream signaling machinery.
- primary_references
- Coding of sweet, bitter, and umami tastes: different receptor cells sharing similar signaling pathways. · 2003 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12581520/ · DOI 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00071-0
- trigger_kind
- machinery_impairment Imported condition classification; unverified.
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): taste, gut sensing, exposure and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-20) · lines 90–96
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Mouse knockout taste behavior and nerve assays. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## monosodium-glutamate-plcb2-loss Recognizing the molecule requires downstream signaling machinery. Plcb2 knockout abolished tested sweet, amino-acid and bitter responses while sparing sour and salty responses in the reported mouse experiments. Model: Mouse knockout taste behavior and nerve assays. Limitations: Reported assay phenotype; not an MSG deficiency or a universal result at every stimulus concentration. Evidence access: Primary abstract Coding of sweet, bitter, and umami tastes: different receptor cells sharing similar signaling pathways. · 2003 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12581520/ · DOI 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00071-0
Complete structured claim and evidenceTas1r3-null mice retained diminished behavioral and nerve responses to umami compounds.
Experimental context and source evidence
- availability_state
- machinery_impairment Imported condition classification; unverified.
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- Mouse receptor knockout.
- limitations
- This result does not identify one exclusive alternative receptor or negate human T1R1/T1R3 activation.
- nutrient_topic
- Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · Monosodium L-glutamate
- plain_language
- The main receptor is not necessarily the only detectable route.
- primary_references
- Detection of sweet and umami taste in the absence of taste receptor T1r3. · 2003 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12869700/ · DOI 10.1126/science.1087155
- trigger_kind
- machinery_impairment Imported condition classification; unverified.
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): taste, gut sensing, exposure and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-20) · lines 138–144
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Mouse receptor knockout. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## monosodium-glutamate-residual-umami The main receptor is not necessarily the only detectable route. Tas1r3-null mice retained diminished behavioral and nerve responses to umami compounds. Model: Mouse receptor knockout. Limitations: This result does not identify one exclusive alternative receptor or negate human T1R1/T1R3 activation. Evidence access: Primary abstract Detection of sweet and umami taste in the absence of taste receptor T1r3. · 2003 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12869700/ · DOI 10.1126/science.1087155
Complete structured claim and evidenceSerotonin depletion blocked glutamate-evoked gastric vagal firing in rats.
Experimental context and source evidence
- availability_state
- machinery_impairment Imported condition classification; unverified.
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- Rat gastric nutrient-sensing experiment.
- limitations
- Does not establish dietary tryptophan depletion from MSG or a human clinical syndrome.
- nutrient_topic
- Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · Monosodium L-glutamate
- plain_language
- A locally available mediator was required in the tested pathway.
- primary_references
- Luminal amino acid sensing in the rat gastric mucosa. · 2006 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16809638/ · DOI 10.1152/ajpgi.00587.2005
- trigger_kind
- machinery_impairment Imported condition classification; unverified.
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): taste, gut sensing, exposure and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-20) · lines 154–160
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Rat gastric nutrient-sensing experiment. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## monosodium-glutamate-serotonin-gate A locally available mediator was required in the tested pathway. Serotonin depletion blocked glutamate-evoked gastric vagal firing in rats. Model: Rat gastric nutrient-sensing experiment. Limitations: Does not establish dietary tryptophan depletion from MSG or a human clinical syndrome. Evidence access: Primary abstract Luminal amino acid sensing in the rat gastric mucosa. · 2006 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16809638/ · DOI 10.1152/ajpgi.00587.2005
Complete structured claim and evidenceIn six adults, 0.5 g/kg sucrose with consommé containing 50 mg/kg MSG reduced peak plasma glutamate from 18.1 to 5.48 micromol/dL and reduced exposure area.
Experimental context and source evidence
- availability_state
- biomarker_context Imported condition classification; unverified.
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- Randomized crossover; three women and three men.
- limitations
- Same research group as the starch study; small acute experiment, not independent mechanistic replication.
- nutrient_topic
- Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · Monosodium L-glutamate
- plain_language
- A second carbohydrate changed the response at a different MSG dose.
- primary_references
- Effect of sucrose ingestion on plasma glutamate concentrations in humans administered monosodium L-glutamate. · 1986 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2870635/ · DOI 10.1093/ajcn/43.4.510
- trigger_kind
- biomarker_context Imported condition classification; unverified.
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): taste, gut sensing, exposure and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-20) · lines 42–48
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Randomized crossover; three women and three men. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## monosodium-glutamate-sucrose-exposure A second carbohydrate changed the response at a different MSG dose. In six adults, 0.5 g/kg sucrose with consommé containing 50 mg/kg MSG reduced peak plasma glutamate from 18.1 to 5.48 micromol/dL and reduced exposure area. Model: Randomized crossover; three women and three men. Limitations: Same research group as the starch study; small acute experiment, not independent mechanistic replication. Evidence access: Primary abstract Effect of sucrose ingestion on plasma glutamate concentrations in humans administered monosodium L-glutamate. · 1986 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2870635/ · DOI 10.1093/ajcn/43.4.510
Complete structured claim and evidenceTrpm5 knockout disrupted the same tested taste modalities in the mouse study.
Experimental context and source evidence
- availability_state
- machinery_impairment Imported condition classification; unverified.
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- Mouse genetic loss-of-function.
- limitations
- Separate from human TRPM5 and from steviol-glycoside effects in other preparations.
- nutrient_topic
- Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · Monosodium L-glutamate
- plain_language
- An ion channel is another gate after receptor recognition.
- primary_references
- Coding of sweet, bitter, and umami tastes: different receptor cells sharing similar signaling pathways. · 2003 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12581520/ · DOI 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00071-0
- trigger_kind
- machinery_impairment Imported condition classification; unverified.
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): taste, gut sensing, exposure and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-20) · lines 98–104
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Mouse genetic loss-of-function. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## monosodium-glutamate-trpm5-loss An ion channel is another gate after receptor recognition. Trpm5 knockout disrupted the same tested taste modalities in the mouse study. Model: Mouse genetic loss-of-function. Limitations: Separate from human TRPM5 and from steviol-glycoside effects in other preparations. Evidence access: Primary abstract Coding of sweet, bitter, and umami tastes: different receptor cells sharing similar signaling pathways. · 2003 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12581520/ · DOI 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00071-0
Complete structured claim and evidenceReceptor chimeras, mutagenesis and modeling support glutamate binding near the hinge of the T1R1 Venus-flytrap domain.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- T1R receptor molecular assays and computational model.
- limitations
- A supported binding model, not a directly observed ligand-bound structure in this paper.
- nutrient_topic
- Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · Monosodium L-glutamate
- plain_language
- Glutamate and its enhancer are not assigned the same binding site.
- primary_references
- Molecular mechanism for the umami taste synergism. · 2008 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19104071/ · DOI 10.1073/pnas.0810174106
Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): taste, gut sensing, exposure and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-20) · lines 74–80
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · T1R receptor molecular assays and computational model. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## monosodium-glutamate-umami-binding-model Glutamate and its enhancer are not assigned the same binding site. Receptor chimeras, mutagenesis and modeling support glutamate binding near the hinge of the T1R1 Venus-flytrap domain. Model: T1R receptor molecular assays and computational model. Limitations: A supported binding model, not a directly observed ligand-bound structure in this paper. Evidence access: Primary abstract Molecular mechanism for the umami taste synergism. · 2008 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19104071/ · DOI 10.1073/pnas.0810174106
Complete structured claim and evidenceMSG-evoked celiac vagal and adrenal splanchnic efferent responses were abolished by gastric vagotomy in rats.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Primary full text
- experimental_model
- Anesthetized-rat intragastric infusion with gastric-branch vagotomy.
- limitations
- Nerve discharge is not direct measurement of a human hormonal or health benefit.
- nutrient_topic
- L-Glutamate collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · L-Glutamate
- plain_language
- Cutting the sensory route interrupted the downstream reflex.
- primary_references
- Effects of intragastric infusion of inosine monophosphate and L: -glutamate on vagal gastric afferent activity and subsequent autonomic reflexes. · 2011 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21132420/ · DOI 10.1007/s12576-010-0121-z
L-Glutamate / L-glutamic acid: carbon and nitrogen allocation, signaling and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-19) · lines 74–80
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Anesthetized-rat intragastric infusion with gastric-branch vagotomy. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## glutamate-gastric-reflex Cutting the sensory route interrupted the downstream reflex. MSG-evoked celiac vagal and adrenal splanchnic efferent responses were abolished by gastric vagotomy in rats. Model: Anesthetized-rat intragastric infusion with gastric-branch vagotomy. Limitations: Nerve discharge is not direct measurement of a human hormonal or health benefit. Evidence access: Primary full text Effects of intragastric infusion of inosine monophosphate and L: -glutamate on vagal gastric afferent activity and subsequent autonomic reflexes. · 2011 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21132420/ · DOI 10.1007/s12576-010-0121-z
Complete structured claim and evidence
The events it takes part in
A mechanism often involves more than two components. These are the full events, with every participant and its role.
Situations it appears in
Low-supply and faulty-machinery situations recorded in the chapters where this component plays a part.
In the sources
Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.
Open hypotheses
Proposed ideas that involve this component. They are labeled as hypotheses and do not change any recorded statement.
This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.