Component

Circulating total testosterone concentration

Circulating total testosterone concentration. Species, exposure and limitations are retained in each linked claim.

8 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What acts on it

  1. Boron supplementation did not significantly improve total or free testosterone relative to placebo in the seven-week bodybuilding study.

    Boron → Circulating total testosterone concentration source_derived_draftungraded
    Experimental context and source evidence
    evidence_span
    {"source_cache": "artifacts/boron-research/8508192.abstract.txt", "locator": "Exact primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "91f7c44f1eb8036fa77ee50cc2cc993c8fcf0bd65f26752b1c9d6d504db34770", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1032, "text_sha256": "91f7c44f1eb8036fa77ee50cc2cc993c8fcf0bd65f26752b1c9d6d504db34770"}
    experimental_model
    Placebo-controlled supplementation trial; 19 male bodybuilders aged 20–27
    exposure
    Ten participants received 2.5 mg boron/day and nine placebo for seven weeks
    limitations
    Small trial in a training context; null results do not prove absence of effects at all doses or in all populations. Training-related improvement in both groups was not a boron effect.
    nutrient_topic
    Boron research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · Boron
    organism
    Human
    plain_language
    This controlled study did not find a testosterone benefit.
    primary_references
    [boron-p8508192] The effect of boron supplementation on lean body mass, plasma testosterone levels, and strength in male bodybuilders. (1993). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8508192/ DOI: 10.1123/ijsn.3.2.140
    tissue_or_cell_type
    Hormone, lean-mass and strength outcomes

    Boron: chemistry, nutrient interactions, low-intake studies and mechanistic uncertainties (2026-09-17) · lines 976–987

    AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Placebo-controlled supplementation trial; 19 male bodybuilders aged 20–27 · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ### boron-bodybuilding-testosterone-null Boron supplementation did not significantly improve total or free testosterone relative to placebo in the seven-week bodybuilding study. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Boron research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: This controlled study did not find a testosterone benefit. organism: Human tissue_or_cell_type: Hormone, lean-mass and strength outcomes experimental_model: Placebo-controlled supplementation trial; 19 male bodybuilders aged 20–27 limitations: Small trial in a training context; null results do not prove absence of effects at all doses or in all populations. Training-related improvement in both groups was not a boron effect. exposure: Ten participants received 2.5 mg boron/day and nine placebo for seven weeks evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/boron-research/8508192.abstract.txt", "locator": "Exact primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "91f7c44f1eb8036fa77ee50cc2cc993c8fcf0bd65f26752b1c9d6d504db34770", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1032, "text_sha256": "91f7c44f1eb8036fa77ee50cc2cc993c8fcf0bd65f26752b1c9d6d504db34770"} [boron-p8508192] The effect of boron supplementation on lean body mass, plasma testosterone levels, and strength in male bodybuilders. (1993). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8508192/ DOI: 10.1123/ijsn.3.2.140
    Complete structured claim and evidence
  2. Boron supplementation increased circulating testosterone in the 1987 postmenopausal feeding study, with an apparently larger response when dietary magnesium was low.

    Boron → Circulating total testosterone concentration source_derived_draftungraded
    Experimental context and source evidence
    availability_state
    nutrient_deficiency Imported condition classification; unverified.
    evidence_span
    {"source_cache": "artifacts/boron-research/3678698.abstract.txt", "locator": "Exact primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "8f95ac01b63502b366e2bd79785b7203deb793d258df065f13cc1e0123c89fb7", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1373, "text_sha256": "8f95ac01b63502b366e2bd79785b7203deb793d258df065f13cc1e0123c89fb7"}
    experimental_model
    Sequential controlled feeding in a metabolic unit; 12 postmenopausal women
    exposure
    About 0.25 mg boron/day for 119 days, then 3 mg/day supplement; seven low-magnesium and five adequate-magnesium participants
    limitations
    Small sequential study, not a fracture or bone-density trial. Diet and magnesium status matter. Later studies did not consistently reproduce the reported effects.
    nutrient_topic
    Boron research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · Boron
    organism
    Human
    plain_language
    A hormone measurement rose in this small study; later findings do not support a reliable hormone-boosting rule.
    primary_references
    [boron-p3678698] Effect of dietary boron on mineral, estrogen, and testosterone metabolism in postmenopausal women. (1987). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3678698/ DOI: 10.1096/fasebj.1.5.3678698
    tissue_or_cell_type
    Systemic mineral balance and circulating hormones
    trigger_kind
    nutrient_deficiency Imported condition classification; unverified.

    Boron: chemistry, nutrient interactions, low-intake studies and mechanistic uncertainties (2026-09-17) · lines 651–662

    AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Sequential controlled feeding in a metabolic unit; 12 postmenopausal women · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ### boron-testosterone-1987 Boron supplementation increased circulating testosterone in the 1987 postmenopausal feeding study, with an apparently larger response when dietary magnesium was low. Condition category: nutrient_deficiency nutrient_topic: Boron research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: A hormone measurement rose in this small study; later findings do not support a reliable hormone-boosting rule. organism: Human tissue_or_cell_type: Systemic mineral balance and circulating hormones experimental_model: Sequential controlled feeding in a metabolic unit; 12 postmenopausal women limitations: Small sequential study, not a fracture or bone-density trial. Diet and magnesium status matter. Later studies did not consistently reproduce the reported effects. exposure: About 0.25 mg boron/day for 119 days, then 3 mg/day supplement; seven low-magnesium and five adequate-magnesium participants evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/boron-research/3678698.abstract.txt", "locator": "Exact primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "8f95ac01b63502b366e2bd79785b7203deb793d258df065f13cc1e0123c89fb7", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1373, "text_sha256": "8f95ac01b63502b366e2bd79785b7203deb793d258df065f13cc1e0123c89fb7"} [boron-p3678698] Effect of dietary boron on mineral, estrogen, and testosterone metabolism in postmenopausal women. (1987). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3678698/ DOI: 10.1096/fasebj.1.5.3678698
    Complete structured claim and evidence
  3. In a 24-man resistance-trained trial, 3 g/day for 14 days did not change testosterone; 6 g/day lowered total and calculated free testosterone.

    Experimental context and source evidence
    evidence_access
    Primary full text
    experimental_model
    Eight men per placebo, 3 g and 6 g arm; at least two years of resistance training.
    limitations
    Small groups and short duration; calculated free testosterone is not a direct free-hormone assay.
    nutrient_topic
    D-Aspartate collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · D-Aspartate
    plain_language
    More was not better in this short dose-comparison trial.
    primary_references
    Three and six grams supplementation of d-aspartic acid in resistance trained men. · 2015 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25844073/ · DOI 10.1186/s12970-015-0078-7

    D-Aspartate: synthesis, clearance, neural and endocrine mechanisms (2026-09-19) · lines 344–350

    AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Eight men per placebo, 3 g and 6 g arm; at least two years of resistance training. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ## d-aspartate-human-dose-trial More was not better in this short dose-comparison trial. In a 24-man resistance-trained trial, 3 g/day for 14 days did not change testosterone; 6 g/day lowered total and calculated free testosterone. Model: Eight men per placebo, 3 g and 6 g arm; at least two years of resistance training. Limitations: Small groups and short duration; calculated free testosterone is not a direct free-hormone assay. Evidence access: Primary full text Three and six grams supplementation of d-aspartic acid in resistance trained men. · 2015 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25844073/ · DOI 10.1186/s12970-015-0078-7
    Complete structured claim and evidence
  4. The same 12-day sodium D-aspartate study reported mean testosterone rising from 4.5 to 6.4 ng/mL; the matched-vitamin placebo group showed no corresponding increase.

    Experimental context and source evidence
    evidence_access
    Primary full text
    experimental_model
    23 treated and 20 placebo men; 3.12 g/day sodium D-aspartate, B6/folate/B12 in both arms.
    limitations
    Not a general testosterone-boosting effect; same cohort as the LH claim, not independent evidence.
    nutrient_topic
    D-Aspartate collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · D-Aspartate
    plain_language
    The early testosterone result belongs to this specific short study.
    primary_references
    The role and molecular mechanism of D-aspartic acid in the release and synthesis of LH and testosterone in humans and rats. · 2009 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19860889/ · DOI 10.1186/1477-7827-7-120

    D-Aspartate: synthesis, clearance, neural and endocrine mechanisms (2026-09-19) · lines 328–334

    AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · 23 treated and 20 placebo men; 3.12 g/day sodium D-aspartate, B6/folate/B12 in both arms. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ## d-aspartate-human-early-testosterone The early testosterone result belongs to this specific short study. The same 12-day sodium D-aspartate study reported mean testosterone rising from 4.5 to 6.4 ng/mL; the matched-vitamin placebo group showed no corresponding increase. Model: 23 treated and 20 placebo men; 3.12 g/day sodium D-aspartate, B6/folate/B12 in both arms. Limitations: Not a general testosterone-boosting effect; same cohort as the LH claim, not independent evidence. Evidence access: Primary full text The role and molecular mechanism of D-aspartic acid in the release and synthesis of LH and testosterone in humans and rats. · 2009 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19860889/ · DOI 10.1186/1477-7827-7-120
    Complete structured claim and evidence
  5. A 12-week 6 g/day trial in trained men found no testosterone benefit or added strength/hypertrophy benefit over placebo.

    Experimental context and source evidence
    evidence_access
    Primary full text
    experimental_model
    22 randomized, 19 completed; resistance training four days weekly.
    limitations
    Overlapping investigators with the 2015 trial; not independent laboratory replication. Hormonal and training endpoints are distinct.
    nutrient_topic
    D-Aspartate collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · D-Aspartate
    plain_language
    The longer higher-dose trial also failed to show a testosterone advantage.
    primary_references
    The effects of d-aspartic acid supplementation in resistance-trained men over a three month training period: A randomised controlled trial. · 2017 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28841667/ · DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0182630

    D-Aspartate: synthesis, clearance, neural and endocrine mechanisms (2026-09-19) · lines 352–358

    AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · 22 randomized, 19 completed; resistance training four days weekly. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ## d-aspartate-human-longer-trial The longer higher-dose trial also failed to show a testosterone advantage. A 12-week 6 g/day trial in trained men found no testosterone benefit or added strength/hypertrophy benefit over placebo. Model: 22 randomized, 19 completed; resistance training four days weekly. Limitations: Overlapping investigators with the 2015 trial; not independent laboratory replication. Hormonal and training endpoints are distinct. Evidence access: Primary full text The effects of d-aspartic acid supplementation in resistance-trained men over a three month training period: A randomised controlled trial. · 2017 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28841667/ · DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0182630
    Complete structured claim and evidence
  6. In resistance-trained men, 3 g/day D-aspartic acid for 28 days did not improve testosterone, strength or body composition relative to placebo.

    Experimental context and source evidence
    evidence_access
    Primary abstract
    experimental_model
    Randomized blinded resistance-training trial; four training days per week.
    limitations
    Different population, formulation and duration from the early sodium-salt study; absence of benefit here is not proof of no effect in every population.
    nutrient_topic
    D-Aspartate collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · D-Aspartate
    plain_language
    A later trained-population trial did not reproduce a testosterone increase.
    primary_references
    D-aspartic acid supplementation combined with 28 days of heavy resistance training has no effect on body composition, muscle strength, and serum hormones associated with the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal axis in resistance-trained men. · 2013 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24074738/ · DOI 10.1016/j.nutres.2013.07.010

    D-Aspartate: synthesis, clearance, neural and endocrine mechanisms (2026-09-19) · lines 336–342

    AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Randomized blinded resistance-training trial; four training days per week. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ## d-aspartate-human-trained-3g A later trained-population trial did not reproduce a testosterone increase. In resistance-trained men, 3 g/day D-aspartic acid for 28 days did not improve testosterone, strength or body composition relative to placebo. Model: Randomized blinded resistance-training trial; four training days per week. Limitations: Different population, formulation and duration from the early sodium-salt study; absence of benefit here is not proof of no effect in every population. Evidence access: Primary abstract D-aspartic acid supplementation combined with 28 days of heavy resistance training has no effect on body composition, muscle strength, and serum hormones associated with the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal axis in resistance-trained men. · 2013 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24074738/ · DOI 10.1016/j.nutres.2013.07.010
    Complete structured claim and evidence

Where it participates (unsigned role)

  1. The 1993 low-boron/supplementation study found no effect of the added boron on measured plasma sex steroids.

    Boron → Circulating estradiol concentration source_derived_draftungraded
    Experimental context and source evidence
    availability_state
    nutrient_deficiency Imported condition classification; unverified.
    evidence_span
    {"source_cache": "artifacts/boron-research/8329361.abstract.txt", "locator": "Exact primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "3e6e2137f75699ea6dce582375f335a85139fea1cfa7ec502f033e8bfe026d63", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1079, "text_sha256": "3e6e2137f75699ea6dce582375f335a85139fea1cfa7ec502f033e8bfe026d63"}
    experimental_model
    Metabolic-unit low-intake/supplementation follow-up
    exposure
    0.33 mg boron/day for three weeks, then an additional 3 mg/day for three weeks
    limitations
    Small, short sequential study. The background diet produced positive calcium balance with increased urinary calcium; the authors proposed that this could mask a boron effect, but did not prove the explanation.
    nutrient_topic
    Boron research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · Boron
    organism
    Human postmenopausal volunteers
    plain_language
    The earlier hormone rise was not reproduced under this shorter regimen.
    primary_references
    [boron-p8329361] The influence of a low-boron diet and boron supplementation on bone, major mineral and sex steroid metabolism in postmenopausal women. (1993). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8329361/ DOI: 10.1079/bjn19930087
    tissue_or_cell_type
    Mineral balance, hormones and bone-turnover markers
    trigger_kind
    nutrient_deficiency Imported condition classification; unverified.

    Boron: chemistry, nutrient interactions, low-intake studies and mechanistic uncertainties (2026-09-17) · lines 716–727

    AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Metabolic-unit low-intake/supplementation follow-up · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ### boron-human-estradiol-null-1993 The 1993 low-boron/supplementation study found no effect of the added boron on measured plasma sex steroids. Condition category: nutrient_deficiency nutrient_topic: Boron research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: The earlier hormone rise was not reproduced under this shorter regimen. organism: Human postmenopausal volunteers tissue_or_cell_type: Mineral balance, hormones and bone-turnover markers experimental_model: Metabolic-unit low-intake/supplementation follow-up limitations: Small, short sequential study. The background diet produced positive calcium balance with increased urinary calcium; the authors proposed that this could mask a boron effect, but did not prove the explanation. exposure: 0.33 mg boron/day for three weeks, then an additional 3 mg/day for three weeks evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/boron-research/8329361.abstract.txt", "locator": "Exact primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "3e6e2137f75699ea6dce582375f335a85139fea1cfa7ec502f033e8bfe026d63", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1079, "text_sha256": "3e6e2137f75699ea6dce582375f335a85139fea1cfa7ec502f033e8bfe026d63"} [boron-p8329361] The influence of a low-boron diet and boron supplementation on bone, major mineral and sex steroid metabolism in postmenopausal women. (1993). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8329361/ DOI: 10.1079/bjn19930087
    Complete structured claim and evidence
  2. This worker study did not detect boron-associated adverse semen or measured reproductive-hormone effects, including in its highest-exposure subgroup.

    Boron → Semen quality measurements source_derived_draftungraded
    Experimental context and source evidence
    evidence_span
    {"source_cache": "artifacts/boron-research/30143848.abstract.txt", "locator": "Exact primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "84c4eb762a64b875d8586c084c3b64e9ec0b2246cba0f05164d94b04d7b26899", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1123, "text_sha256": "84c4eb762a64b875d8586c084c3b64e9ec0b2246cba0f05164d94b04d7b26899"}
    experimental_model
    Occupational observational study; 212 male workers
    exposure
    Extreme-exposure subgroup n=98; estimated daily boron exposure mean 47.17 ± 17.47 mg; blood boron mean 570.6 ± 160.1 ng/g
    limitations
    Observed absence of an association does not prove safety at all exposures or rule out selection, confounding or unmeasured outcomes. Do not extend the authors’ broad safety conclusion beyond the observed data.
    nutrient_topic
    Boron research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · Boron
    organism
    Human
    plain_language
    The observed workers did not show the predicted changes in the measured outcomes; this does not cancel the animal toxicity evidence or establish universal safety.
    primary_references
    [boron-p30143848] Evaluation of FSH, LH, testosterone levels and semen parameters in male boron workers under extreme exposure conditions. (2018). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30143848/ DOI: 10.1007/s00204-018-2296-7
    tissue_or_cell_type
    Semen and circulating FSH, LH and testosterone

    Boron: chemistry, nutrient interactions, low-intake studies and mechanistic uncertainties (2026-09-17) · lines 1184–1195

    AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Occupational observational study; 212 male workers · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ### boron-worker-semen-observation This worker study did not detect boron-associated adverse semen or measured reproductive-hormone effects, including in its highest-exposure subgroup. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Boron research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: The observed workers did not show the predicted changes in the measured outcomes; this does not cancel the animal toxicity evidence or establish universal safety. organism: Human tissue_or_cell_type: Semen and circulating FSH, LH and testosterone experimental_model: Occupational observational study; 212 male workers limitations: Observed absence of an association does not prove safety at all exposures or rule out selection, confounding or unmeasured outcomes. Do not extend the authors’ broad safety conclusion beyond the observed data. exposure: Extreme-exposure subgroup n=98; estimated daily boron exposure mean 47.17 ± 17.47 mg; blood boron mean 570.6 ± 160.1 ng/g evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/boron-research/30143848.abstract.txt", "locator": "Exact primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "84c4eb762a64b875d8586c084c3b64e9ec0b2246cba0f05164d94b04d7b26899", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1123, "text_sha256": "84c4eb762a64b875d8586c084c3b64e9ec0b2246cba0f05164d94b04d7b26899"} [boron-p30143848] Evaluation of FSH, LH, testosterone levels and semen parameters in male boron workers under extreme exposure conditions. (2018). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30143848/ DOI: 10.1007/s00204-018-2296-7
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards