Component
Lithium carbonate
Context-specific entity; species, compartment and exposure are stated on each claim.
8 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.
How nutrients influence it
Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.
Other things that act on it
Enzymes, hormones, genes, and other components with a recorded effect. These are not nutrients, so they do not count toward the arrows above. Each finding names the chapter that recorded it.
How nutrients reach it in more than one step
Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.
Tracing routes…
What it does
Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.
What it acts on
A 71-person ten-week AD trial found no treatment effect on CSF biomarkers or lymphocyte GSK3 activity.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- Mild AD; six-week titration; serum target 0.5–0.8 mmol/L.
- limitations
- Short duration and different disease stage; neither proves lifelong efficacy nor rules out every regimen.
- nutrient_topic
- Lithium collection; molecular form, preparation, species, exposure and manipulation remain explicit. · Lithium
- plain_language
- A cell mechanism did not translate into measured target effects in this trial.
- primary_references
- Lithium trial in Alzheimer's disease: a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter 10-week study. · 2009 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19573486/
Lithium: metal-sensitive enzymes, transport and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-19) · lines 552–558
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Mild AD; six-week titration; serum target 0.5–0.8 mmol/L. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## lithium-ad-short-null A cell mechanism did not translate into measured target effects in this trial. A 71-person ten-week AD trial found no treatment effect on CSF biomarkers or lymphocyte GSK3 activity. Model: Mild AD; six-week titration; serum target 0.5–0.8 mmol/L. Limitations: Short duration and different disease stage; neither proves lifelong efficacy nor rules out every regimen. Evidence access: Primary abstract Lithium trial in Alzheimer's disease: a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter 10-week study. · 2009 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19573486/
Complete structured claim and evidenceLithium monotherapy had fewer new mood-episode interventions than valproate in BALANCE; adding valproate was not clearly superior to lithium alone.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- 330 randomized bipolar-I patients; open-label treatment with masked event review; up to two years.
- limitations
- Combination run-in and open-label design matter; the trial does not identify a single molecular mediator.
- nutrient_topic
- Lithium collection; molecular form, preparation, species, exposure and manipulation remain explicit. · Lithium
- plain_language
- Clinical mood efficacy has its own evidence, separate from dementia hypotheses.
- primary_references
- Lithium plus valproate combination therapy versus monotherapy for relapse prevention in bipolar I disorder (BALANCE): a randomised open-label trial. · 2010 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20092882/ · DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61828-6
Lithium: metal-sensitive enzymes, transport and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-19) · lines 560–566
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · 330 randomized bipolar-I patients; open-label treatment with masked event review; up to two years. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## lithium-bipolar-relapse Clinical mood efficacy has its own evidence, separate from dementia hypotheses. Lithium monotherapy had fewer new mood-episode interventions than valproate in BALANCE; adding valproate was not clearly superior to lithium alone. Model: 330 randomized bipolar-I patients; open-label treatment with masked event review; up to two years. Limitations: Combination run-in and open-label design matter; the trial does not identify a single molecular mediator. Evidence access: Primary abstract Lithium plus valproate combination therapy versus monotherapy for relapse prevention in bipolar I disorder (BALANCE): a randomised open-label trial. · 2010 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20092882/ · DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61828-6
Complete structured claim and evidenceCompleters in the 2026 trial had mean serum lithium 0.17 mEq/L, with substantial variability.
Experimental context and source evidence
- availability_state
- biomarker_context Imported condition classification; unverified.
- evidence_access
- Primary full text
- experimental_model
- Mean daily carbonate dose 195 mg; serum SD 0.13 mEq/L among completers.
- limitations
- Completer exposure is not the whole randomized population or a recommended target.
- nutrient_topic
- Lithium collection; molecular form, preparation, species, exposure and manipulation remain explicit. · Lithium
- plain_language
- The actual exposure matters when comparing trials.
- primary_references
- Low-Dose Lithium for Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. · 2026 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41770546/ · DOI 10.1001/jamaneurol.2026.0072
- trigger_kind
- biomarker_context Imported condition classification; unverified.
Lithium: metal-sensitive enzymes, transport and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-19) · lines 544–550
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Mean daily carbonate dose 195 mg; serum SD 0.13 mEq/L among completers. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## lithium-mci-2026-exposure The actual exposure matters when comparing trials. Completers in the 2026 trial had mean serum lithium 0.17 mEq/L, with substantial variability. Model: Mean daily carbonate dose 195 mg; serum SD 0.13 mEq/L among completers. Limitations: Completer exposure is not the whole randomized population or a recommended target. Evidence access: Primary full text Low-Dose Lithium for Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. · 2026 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41770546/ · DOI 10.1001/jamaneurol.2026.0072
Complete structured claim and evidenceNone of six coprimary outcomes met the prespecified significance threshold in the 2026 low-dose lithium trial.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Primary full text
- experimental_model
- NCT03185208; 83 randomized, 80 started; two years; prespecified P<.01.
- limitations
- Verbal-recall difference P=.05 and exploratory amyloid subgroups are not positive primary results.
- nutrient_topic
- Lithium collection; molecular form, preparation, species, exposure and manipulation remain explicit. · Lithium
- plain_language
- The newer pilot did not confirm its primary efficacy hypotheses.
- primary_references
- Low-Dose Lithium for Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. · 2026 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41770546/ · DOI 10.1001/jamaneurol.2026.0072
Lithium: metal-sensitive enzymes, transport and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-19) · lines 536–542
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · NCT03185208; 83 randomized, 80 started; two years; prespecified P<.01. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## lithium-mci-2026-primary-null The newer pilot did not confirm its primary efficacy hypotheses. None of six coprimary outcomes met the prespecified significance threshold in the 2026 low-dose lithium trial. Model: NCT03185208; 83 randomized, 80 started; two years; prespecified P<.01. Limitations: Verbal-recall difference P=.05 and exploratory amyloid subgroups are not positive primary results. Evidence access: Primary full text Low-Dose Lithium for Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. · 2026 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41770546/ · DOI 10.1001/jamaneurol.2026.0072
Complete structured claim and evidenceA 61-person trial reported cognitive/functional stability with lithium versus decline with placebo over two years.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- Amnestic MCI; lithium carbonate target 0.25–0.5 mEq/L; NCT01055392.
- limitations
- Single trial; population, exposure, endpoints and follow-up differ from later studies.
- nutrient_topic
- Lithium collection; molecular form, preparation, species, exposure and manipulation remain explicit. · Lithium
- plain_language
- One small human trial reported a favorable result.
- primary_references
- Clinical and biological effects of long-term lithium treatment in older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairment: randomised clinical trial. · 2019 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30947755/ · DOI 10.1192/bjp.2019.76
Lithium: metal-sensitive enzymes, transport and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-19) · lines 528–534
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Amnestic MCI; lithium carbonate target 0.25–0.5 mEq/L; NCT01055392. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## lithium-mci-positive One small human trial reported a favorable result. A 61-person trial reported cognitive/functional stability with lithium versus decline with placebo over two years. Model: Amnestic MCI; lithium carbonate target 0.25–0.5 mEq/L; NCT01055392. Limitations: Single trial; population, exposure, endpoints and follow-up differ from later studies. Evidence access: Primary abstract Clinical and biological effects of long-term lithium treatment in older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairment: randomised clinical trial. · 2019 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30947755/ · DOI 10.1192/bjp.2019.76
Complete structured claim and evidencePotassium excretion increased after 600 mg lithium carbonate but not after 300 mg in the volunteer study.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- 15 healthy adults; about 19 mmol extra potassium over 24 hours at the higher dose.
- limitations
- Not evidence that every lithium user develops potassium depletion.
- nutrient_topic
- Lithium collection; molecular form, preparation, species, exposure and manipulation remain explicit. · Lithium
- plain_language
- The potassium response depended on exposure.
- primary_references
- Effect of a single test dose of lithium carbonate on sodium and potassium excretion in man. · 1991 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1649725/ · DOI 10.1042/cs0810059
Lithium: metal-sensitive enzymes, transport and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-19) · lines 360–366
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · 15 healthy adults; about 19 mmol extra potassium over 24 hours at the higher dose. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## lithium-potassium-excretion The potassium response depended on exposure. Potassium excretion increased after 600 mg lithium carbonate but not after 300 mg in the volunteer study. Model: 15 healthy adults; about 19 mmol extra potassium over 24 hours at the higher dose. Limitations: Not evidence that every lithium user develops potassium depletion. Evidence access: Primary abstract Effect of a single test dose of lithium carbonate on sodium and potassium excretion in man. · 1991 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1649725/ · DOI 10.1042/cs0810059
Complete structured claim and evidenceSingle 300- and 600-mg lithium-carbonate doses increased 24-hour sodium excretion by about 17 and 48 mmol, respectively.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- 15 healthy volunteers; randomized blinded crossover and fixed sodium/potassium intake.
- limitations
- Salt doses describe the experiment, not dosing advice; a test dose can perturb a clearance measurement.
- nutrient_topic
- Lithium collection; molecular form, preparation, species, exposure and manipulation remain explicit. · Lithium
- plain_language
- Lithium exposure can change sodium balance.
- primary_references
- Effect of a single test dose of lithium carbonate on sodium and potassium excretion in man. · 1991 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1649725/ · DOI 10.1042/cs0810059
Lithium: metal-sensitive enzymes, transport and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-19) · lines 352–358
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · 15 healthy volunteers; randomized blinded crossover and fixed sodium/potassium intake. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## lithium-sodium-excretion Lithium exposure can change sodium balance. Single 300- and 600-mg lithium-carbonate doses increased 24-hour sodium excretion by about 17 and 48 mmol, respectively. Model: 15 healthy volunteers; randomized blinded crossover and fixed sodium/potassium intake. Limitations: Salt doses describe the experiment, not dosing advice; a test dose can perturb a clearance measurement. Evidence access: Primary abstract Effect of a single test dose of lithium carbonate on sodium and potassium excretion in man. · 1991 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1649725/ · DOI 10.1042/cs0810059
Complete structured claim and evidence
What acts on it
Lithium orotate showed lower amyloid binding than carbonate in the study’s equilibrium-dialysis assays.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Primary full text
- experimental_model
- Synthetic human Aβ42 oligomers/fibrils and controlled salt solutions.
- limitations
- Does not establish superior human brain delivery or product safety.
- nutrient_topic
- Lithium collection; molecular form, preparation, species, exposure and manipulation remain explicit. · Lithium
- plain_language
- The salt preparation changed measured binding.
- primary_references
- Lithium deficiency and the onset of Alzheimer's disease. · 2025 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40770094/ · DOI 10.1038/s41586-025-09335-x
Lithium: metal-sensitive enzymes, transport and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-19) · lines 504–510
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Synthetic human Aβ42 oligomers/fibrils and controlled salt solutions. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## lithium-orotate-binding The salt preparation changed measured binding. Lithium orotate showed lower amyloid binding than carbonate in the study’s equilibrium-dialysis assays. Model: Synthetic human Aβ42 oligomers/fibrils and controlled salt solutions. Limitations: Does not establish superior human brain delivery or product safety. Evidence access: Primary full text Lithium deficiency and the onset of Alzheimer's disease. · 2025 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40770094/ · DOI 10.1038/s41586-025-09335-x
Complete structured claim and evidence
The events it takes part in
A mechanism often involves more than two components. These are the full events, with every participant and its role.
Situations it appears in
Low-supply and faulty-machinery situations recorded in the chapters where this component plays a part.
In the sources
Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.
Open hypotheses
Proposed ideas that involve this component. They are labeled as hypotheses and do not change any recorded statement.
This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.