Component
An authorised European health claim and its conditions of use
An authorised European health claim and its conditions of use. Species, exposure and limitations are retained in each linked claim.
3 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.
How nutrients influence it
Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.
Other things that act on it
Enzymes, hormones, genes, and other components with a recorded effect. These are not nutrients, so they do not count toward the arrows above. Each finding names the chapter that recorded it.
How nutrients reach it in more than one step
Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.
Tracing routes…
What it does
Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.
Where it participates (unsigned role)
Most of the 16 human intervention studies considered pertinent for the scientific substantiation of the claim showed that oat beta-glucans reduce postprandial blood glucose peaks when consumed as part of foods or meals rich in available carbohydrates, the Panel also took into account that oat beta-glucans did not increase postprandial glycaemic or insulinaemic responses and that the mechanism by which consumption could exert the claimed effect is well established, and the Panel concludes that a cause-and-effect relationship has been established, with foods or meals required to contain at least 30 grams of available carbohydrates per portion and at least 3 grams of beta-glucans from oats for each 30 grams of available carbohydrates in order to bear the claim.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_span
- {"source_cache": "artifacts/glucan-research/41726114.abstract.txt", "locator": "Indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "22ad4a8c479116e3d7130ddcda6f561239dc9b2048d52e29279e48bac6799a3e", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1617, "text_sha256": "22ad4a8c479116e3d7130ddcda6f561239dc9b2048d52e29279e48bac6799a3e"}
- experimental_model
- European Food Safety Authority assessment of 16 human intervention studies for a new health claim
- exposure
- Oat beta-glucans consumed as part of foods or meals rich in available carbohydrates
- limitations
- A regulatory opinion that weighs an evidence base and sets conditions of use. Authorisation is a separate legal step, and the claim applies only under the stated conditions.
- nutrient_topic
- Beta-glucan research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct clinical effect, and each preparation is recorded as its own entity with no family link joining any pair. · Beta-glucan
- organism
- Human
- plain_language
- A regulator accepted the effect on the glucose peak, and attached an exact amount and an exact kind of meal to it.
- primary_references
- [bg-p41726114] Oat beta-glucans and reduction of postprandial glucose peak: Evaluation of a health claim pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006. (2026). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41726114/ DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9942
- tissue_or_cell_type
- Postprandial circulation
AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · European Food Safety Authority assessment of 16 human intervention studies for a new health claim · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
### bg-a-claim-with-conditions Most of the 16 human intervention studies considered pertinent for the scientific substantiation of the claim showed that oat beta-glucans reduce postprandial blood glucose peaks when consumed as part of foods or meals rich in available carbohydrates, the Panel also took into account that oat beta-glucans did not increase postprandial glycaemic or insulinaemic responses and that the mechanism by which consumption could exert the claimed effect is well established, and the Panel concludes that a cause-and-effect relationship has been established, with foods or meals required to contain at least 30 grams of available carbohydrates per portion and at least 3 grams of beta-glucans from oats for each 30 grams of available carbohydrates in order to bear the claim. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Beta-glucan research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct clinical effect, and each preparation is recorded as its own entity with no family link joining any pair. plain_language: A regulator accepted the effect on the glucose peak, and attached an exact amount and an exact kind of meal to it. organism: Human tissue_or_cell_type: Postprandial circulation experimental_model: European Food Safety Authority assessment of 16 human intervention studies for a new health claim limitations: A regulatory opinion that weighs an evidence base and sets conditions of use. Authorisation is a separate legal step, and the claim applies only under the stated conditions. exposure: Oat beta-glucans consumed as part of foods or meals rich in available carbohydrates evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/glucan-research/41726114.abstract.txt", "locator": "Indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "22ad4a8c479116e3d7130ddcda6f561239dc9b2048d52e29279e48bac6799a3e", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1617, "text_sha256": "22ad4a8c479116e3d7130ddcda6f561239dc9b2048d52e29279e48bac6799a3e"} [bg-p41726114] Oat beta-glucans and reduction of postprandial glucose peak: Evaluation of a health claim pursuant to Article 13(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006. (2026). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41726114/ DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9942
Complete structured claim and evidenceThe applicant identified a total of 22 references which included three meta-analyses and 19 randomised controlled trials as being pertinent to the health claim, in weighing the evidence the Panel took into account that most of the trials investigating the effects of oat beta-glucan at doses of at least 3 grams per day have shown a statistically significant decrease in LDL-cholesterol concentrations and that there was strong evidence supporting the biological plausibility of the effect, and the Panel concludes that a cause and effect relationship has been established between the consumption of oat beta-glucan and lowering of blood LDL-cholesterol concentrations, considering that in order to bear the claim foods should provide at least 3 grams of oat beta-glucan per day.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_span
- {"source_cache": "artifacts/glucan-research/42004118.abstract.txt", "locator": "Indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "dcfcf120be06e5235e076afd33caa325371eea0a3c56b74b023ea34589e19717", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1690, "text_sha256": "dcfcf120be06e5235e076afd33caa325371eea0a3c56b74b023ea34589e19717"}
- experimental_model
- European Food Safety Authority assessment of three meta-analyses and 19 randomised controlled trials
- exposure
- Oat beta-glucan at doses of at least 3 grams per day
- limitations
- A regulatory opinion on a disease-risk-reduction claim. It concerns lowering of LDL cholesterol; the cardiovascular part of the wording is an inference from the lipid change and not a measured event rate in these trials.
- nutrient_topic
- Beta-glucan research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct clinical effect, and each preparation is recorded as its own entity with no family link joining any pair. · Beta-glucan
- organism
- Human
- plain_language
- The cholesterol claim cleared the same regulator, at three grams a day.
- primary_references
- [bg-p42004118] Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of a health claim related to oat beta glucan and lowering blood cholesterol and reduced risk of (coronary) heart disease pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006. (2010). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42004118/ DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1885
- tissue_or_cell_type
- Serum LDL cholesterol
AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · European Food Safety Authority assessment of three meta-analyses and 19 randomised controlled trials · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
### bg-the-cholesterol-claim-was-accepted The applicant identified a total of 22 references which included three meta-analyses and 19 randomised controlled trials as being pertinent to the health claim, in weighing the evidence the Panel took into account that most of the trials investigating the effects of oat beta-glucan at doses of at least 3 grams per day have shown a statistically significant decrease in LDL-cholesterol concentrations and that there was strong evidence supporting the biological plausibility of the effect, and the Panel concludes that a cause and effect relationship has been established between the consumption of oat beta-glucan and lowering of blood LDL-cholesterol concentrations, considering that in order to bear the claim foods should provide at least 3 grams of oat beta-glucan per day. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Beta-glucan research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct clinical effect, and each preparation is recorded as its own entity with no family link joining any pair. plain_language: The cholesterol claim cleared the same regulator, at three grams a day. organism: Human tissue_or_cell_type: Serum LDL cholesterol experimental_model: European Food Safety Authority assessment of three meta-analyses and 19 randomised controlled trials limitations: A regulatory opinion on a disease-risk-reduction claim. It concerns lowering of LDL cholesterol; the cardiovascular part of the wording is an inference from the lipid change and not a measured event rate in these trials. exposure: Oat beta-glucan at doses of at least 3 grams per day evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/glucan-research/42004118.abstract.txt", "locator": "Indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "dcfcf120be06e5235e076afd33caa325371eea0a3c56b74b023ea34589e19717", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1690, "text_sha256": "dcfcf120be06e5235e076afd33caa325371eea0a3c56b74b023ea34589e19717"} [bg-p42004118] Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of a health claim related to oat beta glucan and lowering blood cholesterol and reduced risk of (coronary) heart disease pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006. (2010). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42004118/ DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1885
Complete structured claim and evidenceThe applicant proposed a reduction of the lowest effective dose from 4 grams to 2 grams of beta-glucans per 30 grams of available carbohydrates and submitted 21 pertinent published human intervention studies with 59 trial comparisons plus four published systematic reviews and dose-response meta-regression analyses, and in weighing the evidence the Panel considered that the human intervention studies did not consistently show a significant effect of beta-glucans from oats or barley on postprandial glucose incremental area under the curve at doses between 2 and less than 4 grams per 30 grams of available carbohydrates, concluding that a consistent effect has not been demonstrated under the conditions of use proposed.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_span
- {"source_cache": "artifacts/glucan-research/40980638.abstract.txt", "locator": "Indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "ed76af02ac95b48fc5e1dd7e51a6ba51f54b5ba01a7daa7a01ce57bdd9d68bad", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1864, "text_sha256": "ed76af02ac95b48fc5e1dd7e51a6ba51f54b5ba01a7daa7a01ce57bdd9d68bad"}
- experimental_model
- European Food Safety Authority assessment of a proposal to halve the dose condition on an existing claim
- exposure
- Beta-glucans from oat or barley at doses between 2 and less than 4 grams per 30 grams of available carbohydrates
- limitations
- An assessment of a proposed change to a condition of use, based on 21 studies with 59 trial comparisons plus four published dose-response analyses. A negative conclusion about a proposed lower dose is not a finding that lower doses never act.
- nutrient_topic
- Beta-glucan research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct clinical effect, and each preparation is recorded as its own entity with no family link joining any pair. · Beta-glucan
- organism
- Human
- plain_language
- Asked to halve the amount required, the regulator looked at the trials and said the evidence did not hold at that dose.
- primary_references
- [bg-p40980638] Beta-glucans from oats or barley and reduction of postprandial glycaemic responses: Modification of an authorised health claim pursuant to Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 following a request in accordance with Article 19 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006. (2025). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40980638/ DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9630
- tissue_or_cell_type
- Postprandial circulation
AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · European Food Safety Authority assessment of a proposal to halve the dose condition on an existing claim · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
### bg-the-lower-dose-was-refused The applicant proposed a reduction of the lowest effective dose from 4 grams to 2 grams of beta-glucans per 30 grams of available carbohydrates and submitted 21 pertinent published human intervention studies with 59 trial comparisons plus four published systematic reviews and dose-response meta-regression analyses, and in weighing the evidence the Panel considered that the human intervention studies did not consistently show a significant effect of beta-glucans from oats or barley on postprandial glucose incremental area under the curve at doses between 2 and less than 4 grams per 30 grams of available carbohydrates, concluding that a consistent effect has not been demonstrated under the conditions of use proposed. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Beta-glucan research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct clinical effect, and each preparation is recorded as its own entity with no family link joining any pair. plain_language: Asked to halve the amount required, the regulator looked at the trials and said the evidence did not hold at that dose. organism: Human tissue_or_cell_type: Postprandial circulation experimental_model: European Food Safety Authority assessment of a proposal to halve the dose condition on an existing claim limitations: An assessment of a proposed change to a condition of use, based on 21 studies with 59 trial comparisons plus four published dose-response analyses. A negative conclusion about a proposed lower dose is not a finding that lower doses never act. exposure: Beta-glucans from oat or barley at doses between 2 and less than 4 grams per 30 grams of available carbohydrates evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/glucan-research/40980638.abstract.txt", "locator": "Indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "ed76af02ac95b48fc5e1dd7e51a6ba51f54b5ba01a7daa7a01ce57bdd9d68bad", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1864, "text_sha256": "ed76af02ac95b48fc5e1dd7e51a6ba51f54b5ba01a7daa7a01ce57bdd9d68bad"} [bg-p40980638] Beta-glucans from oats or barley and reduction of postprandial glycaemic responses: Modification of an authorised health claim pursuant to Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 following a request in accordance with Article 19 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006. (2025). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40980638/ DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9630
Complete structured claim and evidence
The events it takes part in
A mechanism often involves more than two components. These are the full events, with every participant and its role.
Situations it appears in
Low-supply and faulty-machinery situations recorded in the chapters where this component plays a part.
In the sources
Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.
Open hypotheses
Proposed ideas that involve this component. They are labeled as hypotheses and do not change any recorded statement.
This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.