Component
Human post-meal zeaxanthin response
Human post-meal zeaxanthin response. Species, exposure and limitations are retained in each linked claim.
2 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.
How nutrients influence it
Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.
Other things that act on it
Enzymes, hormones, genes, and other components with a recorded effect. These are not nutrients, so they do not count toward the arrows above. Each finding names the chapter that recorded it.
How nutrients reach it in more than one step
Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.
Tracing routes…
What it does
Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.
What acts on it
J-aggregated dipalmitate gave a 23% higher AUC estimate than H-aggregated free pigment, with P=0.064.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_span
- {"source_cache": "artifacts/zeaxanthin-research/29185931.abstract.txt", "locator": "Primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "3db71b8dc1b111c999db31427237d2296afb9024060396a63b2b2bc4d9bbcd37", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1785, "text_sha256": "3db71b8dc1b111c999db31427237d2296afb9024060396a63b2b2bc4d9bbcd37"}
- experimental_model
- Randomized two-way crossover and simulated digestion
- exposure
- 10 mg free-zeaxanthin equivalents in H-aggregated free or J-aggregated dipalmitate formulations
- limitations
- The 23% higher AUC estimate had P=0.064 and did not meet 0.05; aggregation and esterification changed together.
- nutrient_topic
- Zeaxanthin research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · Dietary (3R,3-prime-R)-zeaxanthin
- organism
- 16 human participants and in vitro digestion
- plain_language
- The estimate favored one formulation, but statistical uncertainty remained.
- primary_references
- [zeaxanthin-p29185931] Effect of aggregation form on bioavailability of zeaxanthin in humans: a randomised cross-over study. (2017). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29185931/ DOI: 10.1017/s0007114517002653
- tissue_or_cell_type
- TAG-rich lipoprotein response
Zeaxanthin: metabolism, signaling and nutrient connections (2026-09-17) · lines 821–832
AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Randomized two-way crossover and simulated digestion · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
### zeaxanthin-aggregation-trend J-aggregated dipalmitate gave a 23% higher AUC estimate than H-aggregated free pigment, with P=0.064. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Zeaxanthin research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: The estimate favored one formulation, but statistical uncertainty remained. organism: 16 human participants and in vitro digestion tissue_or_cell_type: TAG-rich lipoprotein response experimental_model: Randomized two-way crossover and simulated digestion limitations: The 23% higher AUC estimate had P=0.064 and did not meet 0.05; aggregation and esterification changed together. exposure: 10 mg free-zeaxanthin equivalents in H-aggregated free or J-aggregated dipalmitate formulations evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/zeaxanthin-research/29185931.abstract.txt", "locator": "Primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "3db71b8dc1b111c999db31427237d2296afb9024060396a63b2b2bc4d9bbcd37", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1785, "text_sha256": "3db71b8dc1b111c999db31427237d2296afb9024060396a63b2b2bc4d9bbcd37"} [zeaxanthin-p29185931] Effect of aggregation form on bioavailability of zeaxanthin in humans: a randomised cross-over study. (2017). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29185931/ DOI: 10.1017/s0007114517002653
Complete structured claim and evidenceThe dipalmitate preparation produced a higher plasma-response AUC than the free preparation in this crossover trial.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_span
- {"source_cache": "artifacts/zeaxanthin-research/15137922.abstract.txt", "locator": "Primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "6410a0f5d52cf32390f90f59a7b17d2340a889f888836129f8a93482ca055be0", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1847, "text_sha256": "6410a0f5d52cf32390f90f59a7b17d2340a889f888836129f8a93482ca055be0"}
- experimental_model
- Randomized single-blind crossover meal trial
- exposure
- 5 mg free zeaxanthin equivalents as free pigment or dipalmitate in yoghurt/breakfast; 24 h sampling
- limitations
- Meal- and formulation-specific response; no proof of disease prevention or an optimal universal formulation.
- nutrient_topic
- Zeaxanthin research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · Dietary (3R,3-prime-R)-zeaxanthin
- organism
- 12 volunteers
- plain_language
- Chemical form changed the measured response to this meal.
- primary_references
- [zeaxanthin-p15137922] Comparison of plasma responses in human subjects after the ingestion of 3R,3R'-zeaxanthin dipalmitate from wolfberry (Lycium barbarum) and non-esterified 3R,3R'-zeaxanthin using chiral high-performance liquid chromatography. (2004). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15137922/ DOI: 10.1079/bjn20041105
- tissue_or_cell_type
- Plasma response
Zeaxanthin: metabolism, signaling and nutrient connections (2026-09-17) · lines 795–806
AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Randomized single-blind crossover meal trial · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
### zeaxanthin-ester-human-response The dipalmitate preparation produced a higher plasma-response AUC than the free preparation in this crossover trial. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Zeaxanthin research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: Chemical form changed the measured response to this meal. organism: 12 volunteers tissue_or_cell_type: Plasma response experimental_model: Randomized single-blind crossover meal trial limitations: Meal- and formulation-specific response; no proof of disease prevention or an optimal universal formulation. exposure: 5 mg free zeaxanthin equivalents as free pigment or dipalmitate in yoghurt/breakfast; 24 h sampling evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/zeaxanthin-research/15137922.abstract.txt", "locator": "Primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "6410a0f5d52cf32390f90f59a7b17d2340a889f888836129f8a93482ca055be0", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1847, "text_sha256": "6410a0f5d52cf32390f90f59a7b17d2340a889f888836129f8a93482ca055be0"} [zeaxanthin-p15137922] Comparison of plasma responses in human subjects after the ingestion of 3R,3R'-zeaxanthin dipalmitate from wolfberry (Lycium barbarum) and non-esterified 3R,3R'-zeaxanthin using chiral high-performance liquid chromatography. (2004). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15137922/ DOI: 10.1079/bjn20041105
Complete structured claim and evidence
The events it takes part in
A mechanism often involves more than two components. These are the full events, with every participant and its role.
Situations it appears in
Low-supply and faulty-machinery situations recorded in the chapters where this component plays a part.
In the sources
Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.
Open hypotheses
Proposed ideas that involve this component. They are labeled as hypotheses and do not change any recorded statement.
This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.