Component
All-cause mortality
All-cause mortality. Species, exposure and limitations are retained in each linked claim.
3 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.
How nutrients influence it
Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.
Other things that act on it
Enzymes, hormones, genes, and other components with a recorded effect. These are not nutrients, so they do not count toward the arrows above. Each finding names the chapter that recorded it.
How nutrients reach it in more than one step
Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.
Tracing routes…
What it does
Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.
What acts on it
All-cause mortality was 10% versus 18%, and cardiovascular mortality was 9% versus 16%, favoring CoQ in Q-SYMBIO.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_span
- {"source_cache": "artifacts/coq10-research/25282031.abstract.txt", "locator": "Primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "20ff9f86de1fab16a33ecadfb2c4e09e9017860f01854cfecf490d473fb8fb65", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 2024, "text_sha256": "20ff9f86de1fab16a33ecadfb2c4e09e9017860f01854cfecf490d473fb8fb65"}
- experimental_model
- Q-SYMBIO randomized double-blind multicenter trial
- exposure
- 100 mg CoQ10 three times daily added to standard therapy
- limitations
- One adjunctive-treatment trial; recruitment preceded current heart-failure regimens. Does not show universal benefit or replacement of standard treatment.
- nutrient_topic
- Coenzyme Q10 research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · Coenzyme Q10 / CoQ10 redox system
- organism
- 420 patients with moderate-to-severe chronic heart failure
- plain_language
- Mortality was a reported secondary outcome, separate from symptom markers.
- primary_references
- [coq10-p25282031] The effect of coenzyme Q10 on morbidity and mortality in chronic heart failure: results from Q-SYMBIO: a randomized double-blind trial. (2014). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25282031/ DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2014.06.008
- tissue_or_cell_type
- Short-term function and two-year clinical events
Coenzyme Q10: biosynthesis, electron transfer, antioxidant recycling and nutrient interactions (2026-09-17) · lines 1100–1111
AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Q-SYMBIO randomized double-blind multicenter trial · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
### coq10-heart-failure-mortality All-cause mortality was 10% versus 18%, and cardiovascular mortality was 9% versus 16%, favoring CoQ in Q-SYMBIO. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Coenzyme Q10 research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: Mortality was a reported secondary outcome, separate from symptom markers. organism: 420 patients with moderate-to-severe chronic heart failure tissue_or_cell_type: Short-term function and two-year clinical events experimental_model: Q-SYMBIO randomized double-blind multicenter trial limitations: One adjunctive-treatment trial; recruitment preceded current heart-failure regimens. Does not show universal benefit or replacement of standard treatment. exposure: 100 mg CoQ10 three times daily added to standard therapy evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/coq10-research/25282031.abstract.txt", "locator": "Primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "20ff9f86de1fab16a33ecadfb2c4e09e9017860f01854cfecf490d473fb8fb65", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 2024, "text_sha256": "20ff9f86de1fab16a33ecadfb2c4e09e9017860f01854cfecf490d473fb8fb65"} [coq10-p25282031] The effect of coenzyme Q10 on morbidity and mortality in chronic heart failure: results from Q-SYMBIO: a randomized double-blind trial. (2014). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25282031/ DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2014.06.008
Complete structured claim and evidenceWithout adjustment the meta-analysis replicated the classic J-shaped curve with reduced mortality for low-volume drinkers (relative risk 0.86), but after adjustment for abstainer biases and study quality no significant reduction remained (relative risk 0.97), while former drinkers had elevated risk (1.22).
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_span
- {"source_cache": "artifacts/alcohol-research/26997174.abstract.txt", "locator": "Indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "db6a3810963367be7e87327becdf62060843fbd53c764a0d5c8f3d6c3084e9ec", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 2096, "text_sha256": "db6a3810963367be7e87327becdf62060843fbd53c764a0d5c8f3d6c3084e9ec"}
- experimental_model
- Systematic review and meta-regression of 87 studies, 3,998,626 people and 367,103 deaths
- exposure
- Alcohol consumption categories against all-cause mortality, adjusted for study quality
- limitations
- A bias-adjustment analysis. It does not report new participants; it reanalyses the existing cohorts after correcting how abstainers were defined.
- nutrient_topic
- Alcohol research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct clinical effect, and ethanol is recorded separately from the acetaldehyde it becomes. · Ethanol
- organism
- Human
- plain_language
- The apparent benefit of light drinking disappears once sick ex-drinkers are taken out of the comparison group.
- primary_references
- [alcohol-p26997174] Do "Moderate" Drinkers Have Reduced Mortality Risk? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Alcohol Consumption and All-Cause Mortality. (2016). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26997174/ DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2016.77.185
- tissue_or_cell_type
- Whole body
Alcohol: ethanol clearance, acetaldehyde, the channels it binds, organ injury and nutrient collisions (2026-09-21) · lines 579–590
AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Systematic review and meta-regression of 87 studies, 3,998,626 people and 367,103 deaths · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
### alcohol-jcurve-artefact Without adjustment the meta-analysis replicated the classic J-shaped curve with reduced mortality for low-volume drinkers (relative risk 0.86), but after adjustment for abstainer biases and study quality no significant reduction remained (relative risk 0.97), while former drinkers had elevated risk (1.22). Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Alcohol research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct clinical effect, and ethanol is recorded separately from the acetaldehyde it becomes. plain_language: The apparent benefit of light drinking disappears once sick ex-drinkers are taken out of the comparison group. organism: Human tissue_or_cell_type: Whole body experimental_model: Systematic review and meta-regression of 87 studies, 3,998,626 people and 367,103 deaths limitations: A bias-adjustment analysis. It does not report new participants; it reanalyses the existing cohorts after correcting how abstainers were defined. exposure: Alcohol consumption categories against all-cause mortality, adjusted for study quality evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/alcohol-research/26997174.abstract.txt", "locator": "Indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "db6a3810963367be7e87327becdf62060843fbd53c764a0d5c8f3d6c3084e9ec", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 2096, "text_sha256": "db6a3810963367be7e87327becdf62060843fbd53c764a0d5c8f3d6c3084e9ec"} [alcohol-p26997174] Do "Moderate" Drinkers Have Reduced Mortality Risk? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Alcohol Consumption and All-Cause Mortality. (2016). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26997174/ DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2016.77.185
Complete structured claim and evidenceIn unadjusted models, protective effects were identified for alcohol consumption against all-cause mortality in pooled English cohorts of adults aged 50 and over, which the authors examine to test the suitability of age-specific limits.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_span
- {"source_cache": "artifacts/alcohol-research/25670624.abstract.txt", "locator": "Indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "2915b9b52e02cedee89d34376f15e2efc97c6a66e83377240892b305c0c5c1b8", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 3171, "text_sha256": "2915b9b52e02cedee89d34376f15e2efc97c6a66e83377240892b305c0c5c1b8"}
- experimental_model
- Pooled analysis of up to 10 population cohorts from the Health Survey for England
- exposure
- Self-reported weekly and heaviest-day consumption in adults aged 50 and over
- limitations
- A large observational cohort with the abstainer comparison the reanalysis above criticises. Protective effects were identified in unadjusted models.
- nutrient_topic
- Alcohol research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct clinical effect, and ethanol is recorded separately from the acetaldehyde it becomes. · Ethanol
- organism
- Human
- plain_language
- In the raw numbers, older people who drank moderately died less often.
- primary_references
- [alcohol-p25670624] All cause mortality and the case for age specific alcohol consumption guidelines: pooled analyses of up to 10 population based cohorts. (2015). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25670624/ DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h384
- tissue_or_cell_type
- Whole body
Alcohol: ethanol clearance, acetaldehyde, the channels it binds, organ injury and nutrient collisions (2026-09-21) · lines 592–603
AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Pooled analysis of up to 10 population cohorts from the Health Survey for England · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
### alcohol-jcurve-observed In unadjusted models, protective effects were identified for alcohol consumption against all-cause mortality in pooled English cohorts of adults aged 50 and over, which the authors examine to test the suitability of age-specific limits. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Alcohol research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct clinical effect, and ethanol is recorded separately from the acetaldehyde it becomes. plain_language: In the raw numbers, older people who drank moderately died less often. organism: Human tissue_or_cell_type: Whole body experimental_model: Pooled analysis of up to 10 population cohorts from the Health Survey for England limitations: A large observational cohort with the abstainer comparison the reanalysis above criticises. Protective effects were identified in unadjusted models. exposure: Self-reported weekly and heaviest-day consumption in adults aged 50 and over evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/alcohol-research/25670624.abstract.txt", "locator": "Indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "2915b9b52e02cedee89d34376f15e2efc97c6a66e83377240892b305c0c5c1b8", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 3171, "text_sha256": "2915b9b52e02cedee89d34376f15e2efc97c6a66e83377240892b305c0c5c1b8"} [alcohol-p25670624] All cause mortality and the case for age specific alcohol consumption guidelines: pooled analyses of up to 10 population based cohorts. (2015). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25670624/ DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h384
Complete structured claim and evidence
The events it takes part in
A mechanism often involves more than two components. These are the full events, with every participant and its role.
Situations it appears in
Low-supply and faulty-machinery situations recorded in the chapters where this component plays a part.
In the sources
Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.
Open hypotheses
Proposed ideas that involve this component. They are labeled as hypotheses and do not change any recorded statement.
This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.