Component

Total sperm count per ejaculate

Total sperm count per ejaculate. Species, exposure and limitations are retained in each linked claim.

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What acts on it

  1. The trial reported improved total sperm count, remaining significant after adjustment.

    Lycopene → Total sperm count per ejaculate source_derived_draftungraded
    Experimental context and source evidence
    evidence_span
    {"source_cache": "artifacts/lycopene-research/31468596.abstract.txt", "locator": "Primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "43f86ccba4712a72d13292bf7fea87e9feb0c514ff5bebcd79adf94f656522c4", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1442, "text_sha256": "43f86ccba4712a72d13292bf7fea87e9feb0c514ff5bebcd79adf94f656522c4"}
    experimental_model
    Double-blind placebo-controlled trial
    exposure
    25 mg/day lycopene for 12 weeks
    limitations
    Small trial; distinguish between-group adjusted results from numerous within-group changes; no live-birth outcome established.
    nutrient_topic
    Lycopene research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · Lycopene
    organism
    Human, 44 men with oligozoospermia
    plain_language
    A semen measurement improved; this does not establish better pregnancy or live-birth rates.
    primary_references
    [lycopene-p31468596] The effects of lycopene supplement on the spermatogram and seminal oxidative stress in infertile men: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. (2019). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31468596/ DOI: 10.1002/ptr.6493
    tissue_or_cell_type
    Semen analysis

    Lycopene: absorption, metabolism, nutrient connections and human outcomes (2026-09-17) · lines 1248–1259

    AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Double-blind placebo-controlled trial · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ### lycopene-sperm-count The trial reported improved total sperm count, remaining significant after adjustment. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Lycopene research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: A semen measurement improved; this does not establish better pregnancy or live-birth rates. organism: Human, 44 men with oligozoospermia tissue_or_cell_type: Semen analysis experimental_model: Double-blind placebo-controlled trial limitations: Small trial; distinguish between-group adjusted results from numerous within-group changes; no live-birth outcome established. exposure: 25 mg/day lycopene for 12 weeks evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/lycopene-research/31468596.abstract.txt", "locator": "Primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "43f86ccba4712a72d13292bf7fea87e9feb0c514ff5bebcd79adf94f656522c4", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1442, "text_sha256": "43f86ccba4712a72d13292bf7fea87e9feb0c514ff5bebcd79adf94f656522c4"} [lycopene-p31468596] The effects of lycopene supplement on the spermatogram and seminal oxidative stress in infertile men: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. (2019). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31468596/ DOI: 10.1002/ptr.6493
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards