Component

Inside-negative potential in rabbit renal brush-border vesicles

Inside-negative potential in rabbit renal brush-border vesicles. Experimental context and limitations are specified in the linked claims.

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What it acts on

  1. An inside-negative membrane potential drove uphill pantothenate accumulation in rabbit renal brush-border vesicles when sodium was present even without a sodium concentration gradient.

    Experimental context and source evidence
    cross_nutrient
    true
    experimental_model
    Isolated rabbit renal brush-border membrane vesicles with controlled ion gradients and membrane potentials
    exposure
    Inside-negative membrane potential imposed with sodium present but no transmembrane sodium gradient.
    limitations
    Rabbit isolated-membrane experiment; this predates molecular identification of SMVT and does not independently assign the effect to human SLC5A6 or establish a human renal clearance threshold.
    nutrient_topic
    Pantothenic acid (vitamin B5) research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · Pantothenate (vitamin B5)
    organism
    Oryctolagus cuniculus
    plain_language
    Electrical potential also helps power renal pantothenate uptake.
    primary_references
    [b5-trans-renal1986] Pantothenate-sodium cotransport in renal brush-border membranes. (1986). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3771539/ DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)66891-7
    tissue_or_cell_type
    Renal brush-border membrane vesicles

    Pantothenic acid (vitamin B5): coenzyme A, deficiency and nutrient interactions (2026-09-17) · lines 249–260

    AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Isolated rabbit renal brush-border membrane vesicles with controlled ion gradients and membrane potentials · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ### b5-trans-renal-membrane-potential An inside-negative membrane potential drove uphill pantothenate accumulation in rabbit renal brush-border vesicles when sodium was present even without a sodium concentration gradient. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Pantothenic acid (vitamin B5) research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: Electrical potential also helps power renal pantothenate uptake. organism: Oryctolagus cuniculus tissue_or_cell_type: Renal brush-border membrane vesicles experimental_model: Isolated rabbit renal brush-border membrane vesicles with controlled ion gradients and membrane potentials limitations: Rabbit isolated-membrane experiment; this predates molecular identification of SMVT and does not independently assign the effect to human SLC5A6 or establish a human renal clearance threshold. exposure: Inside-negative membrane potential imposed with sodium present but no transmembrane sodium gradient. cross_nutrient: true [b5-trans-renal1986] Pantothenate-sodium cotransport in renal brush-border membranes. (1986). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3771539/ DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)66891-7
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards