Component

Parkinson disease UPDRS progression

Parkinson disease UPDRS progression. Species, exposure and limitations are retained in each linked claim.

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What acts on it

  1. Neither CoQ dose slowed UPDRS worsening versus placebo; the trial stopped for futility.

    Experimental context and source evidence
    evidence_span
    {"source_cache": "artifacts/coq10-research/24664227.abstract.txt", "locator": "Primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "b1f301e82d4650432dab586db0be51f96e131f3c6084af9aebde932e8072676b", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 3023, "text_sha256": "b1f301e82d4650432dab586db0be51f96e131f3c6084af9aebde932e8072676b"}
    experimental_model
    Randomized double-blind phase III trial
    exposure
    CoQ10 1200 or 2400 mg/day; all groups received 1200 IU/day vitamin E
    limitations
    Vitamin E was a common background intervention; this comparison cannot identify its independent effect.
    nutrient_topic
    Coenzyme Q10 research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · Coenzyme Q10 / CoQ10 redox system
    organism
    600 early-Parkinson patients
    plain_language
    A plausible mitochondrial mechanism did not translate into slower Parkinson progression in this trial.
    primary_references
    [coq10-p24664227] A randomized clinical trial of high-dosage coenzyme Q10 in early Parkinson disease: no evidence of benefit. (2014). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24664227/ DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.131
    tissue_or_cell_type
    UPDRS progression

    Coenzyme Q10: biosynthesis, electron transfer, antioxidant recycling and nutrient interactions (2026-09-17) · lines 1217–1228

    AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Randomized double-blind phase III trial · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ### coq10-parkinson-null Neither CoQ dose slowed UPDRS worsening versus placebo; the trial stopped for futility. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Coenzyme Q10 research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: A plausible mitochondrial mechanism did not translate into slower Parkinson progression in this trial. organism: 600 early-Parkinson patients tissue_or_cell_type: UPDRS progression experimental_model: Randomized double-blind phase III trial limitations: Vitamin E was a common background intervention; this comparison cannot identify its independent effect. exposure: CoQ10 1200 or 2400 mg/day; all groups received 1200 IU/day vitamin E evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/coq10-research/24664227.abstract.txt", "locator": "Primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "b1f301e82d4650432dab586db0be51f96e131f3c6084af9aebde932e8072676b", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 3023, "text_sha256": "b1f301e82d4650432dab586db0be51f96e131f3c6084af9aebde932e8072676b"} [coq10-p24664227] A randomized clinical trial of high-dosage coenzyme Q10 in early Parkinson disease: no evidence of benefit. (2014). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24664227/ DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.131
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards