Component

Nutritional rickets healing

Process or measured study endpoint, not a chemical species; outcome definition is retained in claim context.

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What acts on it

  1. Calcium-containing treatment produced more biochemical and radiographic healing than vitamin D alone in the Nigerian rickets trial.

    Calcium → Nutritional rickets healing source_derived_draftungraded
    Experimental context and source evidence
    availability_state
    nutrient_deficiency Imported condition classification; unverified.
    experimental_model
    123 children, 24-week randomized trial; low calcium intake also present in matched controls.
    exposure
    1000 mg elemental calcium/day, vitamin D injections, or both. Combined healing endpoint: calcium 61%, combined 58%, vitamin D 19%. Historical regimens only.
    limitations
    Does not make every case of rickets calcium-deficiency disease. The combined endpoint included alkaline phosphatase and radiographs. The injected vitamin D molecular form is not assigned here.
    nutrient_topic
    Calcium research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · Calcium
    organism
    Homo sapiens
    plain_language
    In these children, replacing calcium helped heal rickets.
    primary_references
    [cal-clin-thacher1999] A Comparison of Calcium, Vitamin D, or Both for Nutritional Rickets in Nigerian Children (1999). https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199908193410803 DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199908193410803
    tissue_or_cell_type
    Human clinical or absorption endpoint
    trigger_kind
    nutrient_deficiency Imported condition classification; unverified.

    Calcium: mechanism-first literature curation (2026-09-17) · lines 1187–1197

    AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · 123 children, 24-week randomized trial; low calcium intake also present in matched controls. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ### cal-rickets-repletion Calcium-containing treatment produced more biochemical and radiographic healing than vitamin D alone in the Nigerian rickets trial. Condition category: nutrient_deficiency nutrient_topic: Calcium research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: In these children, replacing calcium helped heal rickets. organism: Homo sapiens tissue_or_cell_type: Human clinical or absorption endpoint experimental_model: 123 children, 24-week randomized trial; low calcium intake also present in matched controls. limitations: Does not make every case of rickets calcium-deficiency disease. The combined endpoint included alkaline phosphatase and radiographs. The injected vitamin D molecular form is not assigned here. exposure: 1000 mg elemental calcium/day, vitamin D injections, or both. Combined healing endpoint: calcium 61%, combined 58%, vitamin D 19%. Historical regimens only. [cal-clin-thacher1999] A Comparison of Calcium, Vitamin D, or Both for Nutritional Rickets in Nigerian Children (1999). https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199908193410803 DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199908193410803
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards