Component

Human perceived sweetness of sucrose solution

Species, assay, exposure and limitations are retained on linked claims.

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What acts on it

  1. Adding gamma-nonalactone increased rated sweetness of 5% sucrose solution by a reported 23.0% at the optimal tested concentration.

    Experimental context and source evidence
    dose
    Gamma-nonalactone concentration series; optimal sweetness reported at 10 mg/kg solution; propylene glycol used at 0.1-0.2% for poorly soluble compounds
    duration
    Acute sensory sessions; at least 2 min between samples
    evidence_access
    Primary full-text methods/results inspected; PubMed metadata where indexed.
    evidence_scope
    literature_reviewed; model-specific source-derived curation
    experimental_model
    Ten trained human sensory evaluators; five men and five women, mean age 24 years
    limitations
    Small trained panel and matrix-specific perception, not a glycemic or dietary-intake trial. Docking and molecular dynamics do not prove T1R2/T1R3 activation or binding.
    nutrient_topic
    Gamma-nonalactone flavor-compound chapter; nutrient and drug interactions retain their experimental settings. · Gamma-nonalactone
    organism
    Ten trained human sensory evaluators; five men and five women, mean age 24 years
    plain_language
    Adding gamma-nonalactone increased rated sweetness of 5% sucrose solution by a reported 23.0% at the optimal tested concentration.
    primary_references
    Sweetness enhancement and mechanism by sweet aroma compounds in the sucrose solution using sensory, electronic tongue, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulation. (2026). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41884462/ DOI: 10.1016/j.fochx.2026.103753
    route
    Oral tasting followed by expectoration
    tissue
    Sweetness ratings in 5% sucrose solution

    Gamma-nonalactone: mechanisms, molecular forms and cross-actor connections (2026-09-20) · lines 235–244

    Original AI-assisted curation of eight primary studies. Study-specific citations, negative findings and limitations retained. Not publisher full text. · supports · Ten trained human sensory evaluators; five men and five women, mean age 24 years · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ## gamma-nonalactone-sucrose-sweetness Adding gamma-nonalactone increased rated sweetness of 5% sucrose solution by a reported 23.0% at the optimal tested concentration. Model/species: Ten trained human sensory evaluators; five men and five women, mean age 24 years Tissue: Sweetness ratings in 5% sucrose solution Exposure: Gamma-nonalactone concentration series; optimal sweetness reported at 10 mg/kg solution; propylene glycol used at 0.1-0.2% for poorly soluble compounds Route: Oral tasting followed by expectoration Duration: Acute sensory sessions; at least 2 min between samples Limits: Small trained panel and matrix-specific perception, not a glycemic or dietary-intake trial. Docking and molecular dynamics do not prove T1R2/T1R3 activation or binding. Primary reference: Sweetness enhancement and mechanism by sweet aroma compounds in the sucrose solution using sensory, electronic tongue, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulation. (2026). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41884462/ DOI: 10.1016/j.fochx.2026.103753 Access: Primary full-text methods/results inspected; PubMed metadata where indexed.
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards