Component
Human mood-disorder symptoms in halted aspartame study
Context-specific entity; species, compartment and exposure are stated on each claim.
1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.
How nutrients influence it
Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.
Other things that act on it
Enzymes, hormones, genes, and other components with a recorded effect. These are not nutrients, so they do not count toward the arrows above. Each finding names the chapter that recorded it.
How nutrients reach it in more than one step
Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.
Tracing routes…
What it does
Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.
What acts on it
A seven-day 30 mg/kg/day crossover reported more severe symptoms in participants with depression; the study stopped after 13 people completed because of reactions.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- Small human psychiatric-history comparison.
- limitations
- Early stopping, small sample and subgroup analysis; no measured neurotransmitter mechanism.
- nutrient_topic
- Aspartame collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · Aspartame
- plain_language
- An early-stopped study signals a question but cannot define a reliable population effect.
- primary_references
- Adverse reactions to aspartame: double-blind challenge in patients from a vulnerable population. · 1993 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8373935/ · DOI 10.1016/0006-3223(93)90251-8
Aspartame: digestion, taste, metabolite dependencies and experimental signaling (2026-09-20) · lines 338–344
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Small human psychiatric-history comparison. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## aspartame-mood-disorder-trial An early-stopped study signals a question but cannot define a reliable population effect. A seven-day 30 mg/kg/day crossover reported more severe symptoms in participants with depression; the study stopped after 13 people completed because of reactions. Model: Small human psychiatric-history comparison. Limitations: Early stopping, small sample and subgroup analysis; no measured neurotransmitter mechanism. Evidence access: Primary abstract Adverse reactions to aspartame: double-blind challenge in patients from a vulnerable population. · 1993 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8373935/ · DOI 10.1016/0006-3223(93)90251-8
Complete structured claim and evidence
The events it takes part in
A mechanism often involves more than two components. These are the full events, with every participant and its role.
Situations it appears in
Low-supply and faulty-machinery situations recorded in the chapters where this component plays a part.
In the sources
Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.
Open hypotheses
Proposed ideas that involve this component. They are labeled as hypotheses and do not change any recorded statement.
This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.