Component

Cognition in the 96-week RA-extract trial

Cognition in the 96-week RA-extract trial

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What acts on it

  1. The 323-person trial found no significant overall cognitive advantage at 96 weeks.

    Experimental context and source evidence
    evidence_access
    Indexed primary abstract/metadata only; unextracted doses, figures and methods remain unknown.
    experimental_contrast
    {"intervention": "RA-rich lemon-balm extract", "comparator": "Placebo", "endpoint": "The 323-person trial found no significant overall cognitive advantage at 96 weeks.", "effect_direction": "no_detected_change", "combination": "single", "conditions": []} Explicit extracted experimental comparison; recorded from source.
    experimental_model
    Subjective or mild cognitive impairment; extract providing 500 mg RA/day; placebo-controlled, 24-week washout.
    interpretation_status
    Recorded from source with stated access limits; ungraded, not independent replication.
    limitations
    Limited to the recorded preparation, model, exposure and endpoint. Does not establish a human dietary deficiency, clinical benefit or unique molecular mediation.
    nutrient_topic
    Rosmarinic acid collection; exact intervention and molecular form govern interpretation. · Rosmarinic acid
    plain_language
    The 323-person trial found no significant overall cognitive advantage at 96 weeks.
    primary_references
    Effects of Melissa officinalis Extract Containing Rosmarinic Acid on Cognition in Older Adults Without Dementia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36502333/ | https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-220953
    source_locator
    Reviewed reference ra-long-cognition-null; Nonhypertensive subgroup wording requires verification: the abstract-listed changes do not align with its favorable conclusion.

    Rosmarinic acid: detailed mechanisms of action (reviewed 10 October 2026) · lines 473–479

    AI-assisted original curation of primary studies; claim-local access and experimental limitations stated. Includes original-draft correction history. No independent replication claimed. · supports · Subjective or mild cognitive impairment; extract providing 500 mg RA/day; placebo-controlled, 24-week washout. · Recorded from source · Recorded from source

    ### ra-long-cognition-null The 323-person trial found no significant overall cognitive advantage at 96 weeks. Nonhypertensive subgroup wording requires verification: the abstract-listed changes do not align with its favorable conclusion. Model and exposure: Subjective or mild cognitive impairment; extract providing 500 mg RA/day; placebo-controlled, 24-week washout. Limitations: Limited to the recorded preparation, model, exposure and endpoint. Does not establish a human dietary deficiency, clinical benefit or unique molecular mediation. Reference: Effects of Melissa officinalis Extract Containing Rosmarinic Acid on Cognition in Older Adults Without Dementia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. | 2023 | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36502333/ | https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-220953 | Access: Indexed primary abstract/metadata only; unextracted doses, figures and methods remain unknown.
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.