Component

Breast-milk iodine concentration

Breast-milk iodine concentration. Study-specific scope and measurement methods are recorded with each claim.

2 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What acts on it

  1. Breast-milk iodine concentration was higher with maternal supplementation than with direct infant supplementation over follow-up (P<0.0001).

    Experimental context and source evidence
    availability_state
    nutrient_deficiency Imported condition classification; unverified.
    cross_nutrient
    false
    evidence_location
    Primary PDF Methods, trial profile, Results and Table2, pp.197–209.
    experimental_model
    Double-blind randomized trial in Morocco;241 mother–infant pairs enrolled, 239 randomized after two age exclusions
    exposure
    Term infants ≤ 8 weeks; indirect arm 121 pairs: mother 400 mg iodine as oral iodized poppyseed oil, infant placebo; direct arm 118 pairs: infant about 100 mg iodine from half a 200 mg oil capsule, mother placebo; follow-up 3, 6, 9 months.
    limitations
    Both arms received active iodine somewhere in the pair; there was no wholly untreated arm. Breastfeeding and baseline deficiency contextualize the result; measured iodine status is not a child cognitive outcome. Actual infant study dose was about 100 mg, not the 200 mg guideline discussed elsewhere in the paper.
    nutrient_topic
    Iodine research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · Iodine
    organism
    Homo sapiens
    plain_language
    Treating the mother increased the iodine delivered in her milk in this deficient setting.
    primary_references
    [iod-clin-bouhouch2014] Direct iodine supplementation of infants versus supplementation of their breastfeeding mothers: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. (2014). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24622750/ DOI: 10.1016/s2213-8587(13)70155-4
    tissue_or_cell_type
    Breast milk, infant urine and thyroid function
    trigger_kind
    nutrient_deficiency Imported condition classification; unverified.

    Iodine: thyroid hormone production, deficiency, excess and nutrient interactions (2026-09-17) · lines 1538–1550

    AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Double-blind randomized trial in Morocco;241 mother–infant pairs enrolled, 239 randomized after two age exclusions · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ### iod-clin-lactation-milk Breast-milk iodine concentration was higher with maternal supplementation than with direct infant supplementation over follow-up (P<0.0001). Condition category: nutrient_deficiency nutrient_topic: Iodine research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: Treating the mother increased the iodine delivered in her milk in this deficient setting. organism: Homo sapiens tissue_or_cell_type: Breast milk, infant urine and thyroid function experimental_model: Double-blind randomized trial in Morocco;241 mother–infant pairs enrolled, 239 randomized after two age exclusions limitations: Both arms received active iodine somewhere in the pair; there was no wholly untreated arm. Breastfeeding and baseline deficiency contextualize the result; measured iodine status is not a child cognitive outcome. Actual infant study dose was about 100 mg, not the 200 mg guideline discussed elsewhere in the paper. exposure: Term infants ≤ 8 weeks; indirect arm 121 pairs: mother 400 mg iodine as oral iodized poppyseed oil, infant placebo; direct arm 118 pairs: infant about 100 mg iodine from half a 200 mg oil capsule, mother placebo; follow-up 3, 6, 9 months. cross_nutrient: false evidence_location: Primary PDF Methods, trial profile, Results and Table2, pp.197–209. [iod-clin-bouhouch2014] Direct iodine supplementation of infants versus supplementation of their breastfeeding mothers: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. (2014). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24622750/ DOI: 10.1016/s2213-8587(13)70155-4
    Complete structured claim and evidence

Where it participates (unsigned role)

  1. Infant urinary iodine was higher in the maternal-supplement arm (P=0.042); group medians exceeded 100 micrograms/L at 3 and 6 months in that arm, versus only 6 months in the direct-infant arm.

    Iodized oil preparation → Urinary iodine concentration source_derived_draftungraded
    Experimental context and source evidence
    availability_state
    nutrient_deficiency Imported condition classification; unverified.
    cross_nutrient
    false
    evidence_location
    Primary PDF Methods, trial profile, Results and Table2, pp.197–209.
    experimental_model
    Double-blind randomized trial in Morocco;241 mother–infant pairs enrolled, 239 randomized after two age exclusions
    exposure
    Term infants ≤ 8 weeks; indirect arm 121 pairs: mother 400 mg iodine as oral iodized poppyseed oil, infant placebo; direct arm 118 pairs: infant about 100 mg iodine from half a 200 mg oil capsule, mother placebo; follow-up 3, 6, 9 months.
    limitations
    Both arms received active iodine somewhere in the pair; there was no wholly untreated arm. Breastfeeding and baseline deficiency contextualize the result; measured iodine status is not a child cognitive outcome. Actual infant study dose was about 100 mg, not the 200 mg guideline discussed elsewhere in the paper. The 100-microgram/L statement concerns group medians as interpreted by the paper, not proof of adequacy in every infant.
    nutrient_topic
    Iodine research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · Iodine
    organism
    Homo sapiens
    plain_language
    The maternal route improved the infants’ measured iodine status for longer.
    primary_references
    [iod-clin-bouhouch2014] Direct iodine supplementation of infants versus supplementation of their breastfeeding mothers: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. (2014). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24622750/ DOI: 10.1016/s2213-8587(13)70155-4
    tissue_or_cell_type
    Breast milk, infant urine and thyroid function
    trigger_kind
    nutrient_deficiency Imported condition classification; unverified.

    Iodine: thyroid hormone production, deficiency, excess and nutrient interactions (2026-09-17) · lines 1552–1564

    AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Double-blind randomized trial in Morocco;241 mother–infant pairs enrolled, 239 randomized after two age exclusions · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ### iod-clin-lactation-infant-urine Infant urinary iodine was higher in the maternal-supplement arm (P=0.042); group medians exceeded 100 micrograms/L at 3 and 6 months in that arm, versus only 6 months in the direct-infant arm. Condition category: nutrient_deficiency nutrient_topic: Iodine research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: The maternal route improved the infants’ measured iodine status for longer. organism: Homo sapiens tissue_or_cell_type: Breast milk, infant urine and thyroid function experimental_model: Double-blind randomized trial in Morocco;241 mother–infant pairs enrolled, 239 randomized after two age exclusions limitations: Both arms received active iodine somewhere in the pair; there was no wholly untreated arm. Breastfeeding and baseline deficiency contextualize the result; measured iodine status is not a child cognitive outcome. Actual infant study dose was about 100 mg, not the 200 mg guideline discussed elsewhere in the paper. The 100-microgram/L statement concerns group medians as interpreted by the paper, not proof of adequacy in every infant. exposure: Term infants ≤ 8 weeks; indirect arm 121 pairs: mother 400 mg iodine as oral iodized poppyseed oil, infant placebo; direct arm 118 pairs: infant about 100 mg iodine from half a 200 mg oil capsule, mother placebo; follow-up 3, 6, 9 months. cross_nutrient: false evidence_location: Primary PDF Methods, trial profile, Results and Table2, pp.197–209. [iod-clin-bouhouch2014] Direct iodine supplementation of infants versus supplementation of their breastfeeding mothers: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. (2014). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24622750/ DOI: 10.1016/s2213-8587(13)70155-4
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards