Component

Placebo-adjusted whole-blood transcriptome contrast

Study-defined Placebo-adjusted whole-blood transcriptome contrast. Read each linked record for species, exposure and endpoint.

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What acts on it

  1. Difference-in-difference testing found no significant probe changes in the white-European cohort or pooled D2/D3-versus-placebo analyses; five were found specifically for D3 versus placebo in the South-Asian cohort, largely driven by placebo-group changes.

    Experimental context and source evidence
    cross_nutrient
    false
    experimental_model
    97 participant transcriptomic subset of Tripkovic 2017; 67 white-European and 30 South-Asian women
    exposure
    15 micrograms/day D2 or D3 or placebo for 12 winter weeks; blood microarrays at baseline/end.
    limitations
    Exploratory selected trial subset; differences in baseline status, season and whole-blood cell composition may matter. Within-group significance is not a significant difference between groups; no infection endpoint.
    nutrient_topic
    Vitamin D2 and D3 research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · Vitamin D2 and D3
    organism
    Homo sapiens
    plain_language
    The strongest direct comparisons were much less conclusive than the within-group gene-change lists.
    primary_references
    [durrant2022] Vitamins D2 and D3 Have Overlapping But Different Effects on the Human Immune System Revealed Through Analysis of the Blood Transcriptome. (2022). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35281034/ DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.790444
    tissue_or_cell_type
    Whole blood

    Vitamin D2 and D3: mechanisms, deficiency and nutrient interactions (2026-09-17) · lines 1087–1098

    AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · 97 participant transcriptomic subset of Tripkovic 2017; 67 white-European and 30 South-Asian women · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ### vd-durrant-direct-contrast Difference-in-difference testing found no significant probe changes in the white-European cohort or pooled D2/D3-versus-placebo analyses; five were found specifically for D3 versus placebo in the South-Asian cohort, largely driven by placebo-group changes. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Vitamin D2 and D3 research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: The strongest direct comparisons were much less conclusive than the within-group gene-change lists. organism: Homo sapiens tissue_or_cell_type: Whole blood experimental_model: 97 participant transcriptomic subset of Tripkovic 2017; 67 white-European and 30 South-Asian women limitations: Exploratory selected trial subset; differences in baseline status, season and whole-blood cell composition may matter. Within-group significance is not a significant difference between groups; no infection endpoint. exposure: 15 micrograms/day D2 or D3 or placebo for 12 winter weeks; blood microarrays at baseline/end. cross_nutrient: false [durrant2022] Vitamins D2 and D3 Have Overlapping But Different Effects on the Human Immune System Revealed Through Analysis of the Blood Transcriptome. (2022). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35281034/ DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.790444
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards