Component

ALS functional progression and survival

ALS functional progression and survival. Species, exposure and limitations are retained in each linked claim.

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What acts on it

  1. Creatine did not improve survival or the decline in functional measurements in the ALS trial.

    Experimental context and source evidence
    evidence_span
    {"source_cache": "artifacts/creatine-research/12666111.abstract.txt", "locator": "Exact primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "9b668ab22f36cab83a9ccca495012eeff4c953adbd62955fa0efba24a06477ed", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1367, "text_sha256": "9b668ab22f36cab83a9ccca495012eeff4c953adbd62955fa0efba24a06477ed"}
    experimental_model
    Double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial
    exposure
    Creatine monohydrate 10 g/day versus placebo
    limitations
    Negative human trial despite a preceding mouse rationale; no inference to every neurological condition.
    nutrient_topic
    Creatine research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · Creatine
    organism
    175 people with ALS
    plain_language
    An energy-related mechanism and a promising mouse model did not translate into benefit in this human trial.
    primary_references
    [creatine-p12666111] A randomized sequential trial of creatine in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. (2003). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12666111/ DOI: 10.1002/ana.10554
    tissue_or_cell_type
    Survival and functional progression

    Creatine: synthesis, transport, phosphocreatine energetics and nutrient interactions (2026-09-17) · lines 1127–1138

    AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ### creatine-als-negative Creatine did not improve survival or the decline in functional measurements in the ALS trial. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Creatine research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: An energy-related mechanism and a promising mouse model did not translate into benefit in this human trial. organism: 175 people with ALS tissue_or_cell_type: Survival and functional progression experimental_model: Double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial limitations: Negative human trial despite a preceding mouse rationale; no inference to every neurological condition. exposure: Creatine monohydrate 10 g/day versus placebo evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/creatine-research/12666111.abstract.txt", "locator": "Exact primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "9b668ab22f36cab83a9ccca495012eeff4c953adbd62955fa0efba24a06477ed", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1367, "text_sha256": "9b668ab22f36cab83a9ccca495012eeff4c953adbd62955fa0efba24a06477ed"} [creatine-p12666111] A randomized sequential trial of creatine in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. (2003). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12666111/ DOI: 10.1002/ana.10554
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards