Component

UGA recoding

Context-dependent decoding of UGA as selenocysteine during selenoprotein translation.

4 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What acts on it

  1. Experimental FTSJ1 loss reduces efficient selenocysteine insertion at UGA.

    FTSJ1 → UGA recoding source_derived_draftsource_reported: Cell/biochemical and animal xenograft; a narrow primary-study spot check supports the named FTSJ1 finding.
    Experimental context and source evidence
    availability_state
    Experimental loss of FTSJ1-dependent tRNA modification.
    experimental_scope
    Cell/biochemical studies and melanoma xenograft models reported in the 2024 FTSJ1 study.
    limitations
    FTSJ1 loss is a machinery perturbation, not itself a nutritional selenium-deficiency syndrome. The results do not prove that Um34 determines every selenoprotein phenotype.
    trigger_kind
    machinery_impairment

    Selenium deficiency: a mechanism-first reference · lines 75–75

    Supplied selenium deficiency reference · supports · Supplied reference; verify the primary study and experimental context. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    Update: FTSJ1 was identified in 2024 as the tRNA^[Ser]Sec Um34 methyltransferase. Loss of FTSJ1 reduced efficient Sec insertion and sensitized experimental cells to oxidative stress. Evidence: cell/biochemical and melanoma xenograft models. [1]
    Complete structured claim and evidence
  2. A constrained Sec-tRNA supply can impair selenocysteine insertion at UGA in a transcript-dependent manner.

    Sec-tRNA[Ser]Sec → UGA recoding source_derived_draftsource_reported: Cell/biochemical mechanism; source-derived unverified synthesis.
    Experimental context and source evidence
    availability_state
    Selenium intake or availability becomes inadequate for the cellular context.
    experimental_scope
    Biochemical pathway and experimental shortage model; effects depend on transcript and tissue.
    limitations
    This is a conditional supply constraint, not a prediction that all selenoproteins fall equally. No validated plasma cutoff is assigned.
    trigger_kind
    nutrient_deficiency

    Selenium deficiency: a mechanism-first reference · lines 35–45

    Supplied selenium deficiency reference · supports · Supplied reference; verify the primary study and experimental context. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    Sec-tRNA^[Ser]Sec ↓ eEFSec ribosome reaches UGA ↓ SECIS + SECISBP2/SBP2 machinery ↓ SELENOCYSTEINE INSERTED SerRS charging tRNA^[Ser]Sec with serine is an obligatory biosynthetic step, not a mistake. SEPHS2 supplies selenophosphate, while PSTK and SEPSECS convert the serine-charged tRNA into Sec-tRNA^[Ser]Sec. UGA recoding is intrinsically less straightforward than ordinary amino-acid insertion and its efficiency varies substantially by transcript and cellular context. It should not be treated as a universal 5–10% process across all selenoprotein mRNAs.

    Selenium deficiency: a mechanism-first reference · lines 783–790

    Supplied selenium deficiency reference · supports · Supplied reference; verify the primary study and experimental context. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    selenium intake / availability ↓ │ ▼ central selenium metabolism and Sec-tRNA supply become constrained │ ├─ tRNA^[Ser]Sec modification can shift (including Um34 / FTSJ1 biology) ├─ SECIS-dependent UGA recoding changes ├─ selected transcripts can undergo stronger repression / NMD
    Complete structured claim and evidence
  3. SECISBP2 deficiency compromises a required component of SECIS-dependent selenocysteine decoding.

    SECISBP2 / SBP2 → UGA recoding source_derived_draftsource_reported: Human genetic disease and biochemical mechanism as reported in the supplied source; unverified synthesis.
    Experimental context and source evidence
    availability_state
    Rare genetic SECISBP2 deficiency, distinct from inadequate dietary selenium.
    experimental_scope
    Rare human genetic disorder and biochemical role of SECIS-dependent recoding.
    limitations
    Growth, muscle, and reproductive findings in genetic disease are not direct phenocopies of ordinary dietary deficiency. Adequate intake does not define machinery function.
    trigger_kind
    machinery_impairment

    Selenium deficiency: a mechanism-first reference · lines 35–41

    Supplied selenium deficiency reference · supports · Supplied reference; verify the primary study and experimental context. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    Sec-tRNA^[Ser]Sec ↓ eEFSec ribosome reaches UGA ↓ SECIS + SECISBP2/SBP2 machinery ↓ SELENOCYSTEINE INSERTED

    Selenium deficiency: a mechanism-first reference · lines 83–83

    Supplied selenium deficiency reference · supports · Supplied reference; verify the primary study and experimental context. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    Layer 2 — SECIS-dependent translation. SECIS structure, SECISBP2/SBP2 interactions, eEFSec, ribosomal context, and other RNA-binding proteins influence recoding efficiency.

    Selenium deficiency: a mechanism-first reference · lines 497–509

    Supplied selenium deficiency reference · supports · Supplied reference; verify the primary study and experimental context. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    Rare genetic disorders help show what happens when parts of selenoprotein biology fail despite adequate dietary selenium. Gene / protein Disorder or molecular role Selected phenotype / implication SECISBP2 (SBP2) SECISBP2 deficiency Abnormal thyroid-hormone profile, growth and muscle phenotypes, male infertility and other multisystem effects
    Complete structured claim and evidence
  4. Human SECIS elements show widely differing reporter recoding activities, precluding a universal endogenous 5–10 percent efficiency inference.

    Experimentally tested human SECIS elements → UGA recoding source_derived_draftliterature_reviewed:supported_interpretation
    Experimental context and source evidence
    cell_type
    HEK293 and HepG2 reporters
    experimental_model
    26 human SECIS reporters in HEK293/HepG2 and cell-free translation
    limitations
    Reporter activity is not a direct count of all endogenous translation outcomes.
    organism
    Homo sapiens

    Selenium: literature corrections and mechanism additions · lines 1203–1213

    Metabolic Ledger literature curation, 17 September 2026; primary papers linked individually · supports · 26 human SECIS reporters in HEK293/HepG2 and cell-free translation · secondary_verified · secondary_verified

    ## secis-variable Efficiency depends on the RNA and test conditions. Human SECIS elements show widely differing reporter recoding activities, precluding a universal endogenous 5–10 percent efficiency inference. Organism: Homo sapiens Cell type: HEK293 and HepG2 reporters Experimental model: 26 human SECIS reporters in HEK293/HepG2 and cell-free translation Limitations: Reporter activity is not a direct count of all endogenous translation outcomes. Primary reference: [Novel structural determinants in human SECIS elements modulate the translational recoding of UGA as selenocysteine](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2761289/)
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards