Component
Weanling pig MUC2 expression and mucosal barrier
Context-specific entity; species, compartment and exposure are stated on each claim.
1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.
How nutrients influence it
Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.
Other things that act on it
Enzymes, hormones, genes, and other components with a recorded effect. These are not nutrients, so they do not count toward the arrows above. Each finding names the chapter that recorded it.
How nutrients reach it in more than one step
Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.
Tracing routes…
What it does
Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.
What acts on it
In weanling pigs, both 0.37% and 1.11% dietary digestible threonine reduced duodenal mucin and MUC2 expression relative to 0.89% during fourteen-day feeding.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Primary abstract
- experimental_model
- Four groups of eight pigs; 0.37%, 0.74%, 0.89% or 1.11% true ileal digestible threonine.
- limitations
- Pig diet percentages do not establish human doses. Different duration, preparation and endpoint explain why this need not oppose the acute loop experiment.
- nutrient_topic
- L-Threonine collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · L-Threonine
- plain_language
- More was not always better in a chronic feeding experiment.
- primary_references
- Optimal dietary true ileal digestible threonine for supporting the mucosal barrier in small intestine of weanling pigs. · 2010 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20335627/ · DOI 10.3945/jn.109.118497
L-Threonine: translation, intestinal barrier, metabolism and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-19) · lines 242–248
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Four groups of eight pigs; 0.37%, 0.74%, 0.89% or 1.11% true ileal digestible threonine. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## l-threonine-gut-nonlinearity More was not always better in a chronic feeding experiment. In weanling pigs, both 0.37% and 1.11% dietary digestible threonine reduced duodenal mucin and MUC2 expression relative to 0.89% during fourteen-day feeding. Model: Four groups of eight pigs; 0.37%, 0.74%, 0.89% or 1.11% true ileal digestible threonine. Limitations: Pig diet percentages do not establish human doses. Different duration, preparation and endpoint explain why this need not oppose the acute loop experiment. Evidence access: Primary abstract Optimal dietary true ileal digestible threonine for supporting the mucosal barrier in small intestine of weanling pigs. · 2010 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20335627/ · DOI 10.3945/jn.109.118497
Complete structured claim and evidence
The events it takes part in
A mechanism often involves more than two components. These are the full events, with every participant and its role.
Situations it appears in
Low-supply and faulty-machinery situations recorded in the chapters where this component plays a part.
In the sources
Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.
Open hypotheses
Proposed ideas that involve this component. They are labeled as hypotheses and do not change any recorded statement.
This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.