Component

Ovulation

Ovulation. Species, exposure and limitations are retained in each linked claim.

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What acts on it

  1. Ovulation occurred in 19/22 D-chiro-inositol recipients versus 6/22 placebo recipients in the 1999 PCOS trial.

    D-chiro-inositol → Ovulation source_derived_draftungraded
    Experimental context and source evidence
    evidence_span
    {"source_cache": "artifacts/inositol-research/10219066.abstract.txt", "locator": "Exact primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "2b70007c28cc93c6f18b457701ec8b034a3bbe888db05e85eca71d50199dc854", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 2121, "text_sha256": "2b70007c28cc93c6f18b457701ec8b034a3bbe888db05e85eca71d50199dc854"}
    experimental_model
    Randomized placebo-controlled trial
    exposure
    D-chiro-inositol 1200 mg/day for 6–8 weeks versus placebo; historical study regimen
    limitations
    Small short trial, not live-birth evidence. Within-group insulin improvement was stronger than the between-group comparison.
    nutrient_topic
    Inositol research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · Inositol (stereoisomer family)
    organism
    Homo sapiens
    plain_language
    This small trial found more ovulation with D-chiro-inositol; it did not establish improved live birth.
    primary_references
    [ino-p10219066] Ovulatory and metabolic effects of D-chiro-inositol in the polycystic ovary syndrome. (1999). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10219066/ DOI: 10.1056/nejm199904293401703
    tissue_or_cell_type
    44 obese women with PCOS

    Inositol: synthesis, signaling, mineral interactions and conditional deficiency (2026-09-17) · lines 1289–1300

    AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Randomized placebo-controlled trial · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ### ino-dci-trial Ovulation occurred in 19/22 D-chiro-inositol recipients versus 6/22 placebo recipients in the 1999 PCOS trial. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Inositol research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: This small trial found more ovulation with D-chiro-inositol; it did not establish improved live birth. organism: Homo sapiens tissue_or_cell_type: 44 obese women with PCOS experimental_model: Randomized placebo-controlled trial limitations: Small short trial, not live-birth evidence. Within-group insulin improvement was stronger than the between-group comparison. exposure: D-chiro-inositol 1200 mg/day for 6–8 weeks versus placebo; historical study regimen evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/inositol-research/10219066.abstract.txt", "locator": "Exact primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "2b70007c28cc93c6f18b457701ec8b034a3bbe888db05e85eca71d50199dc854", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 2121, "text_sha256": "2b70007c28cc93c6f18b457701ec8b034a3bbe888db05e85eca71d50199dc854"} [ino-p10219066] Ovulatory and metabolic effects of D-chiro-inositol in the polycystic ovary syndrome. (1999). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10219066/ DOI: 10.1056/nejm199904293401703
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards