Component

Neural tube defect recurrence

Neural tube defect recurrence. Species, exposure and limitations are retained in each linked claim.

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What acts on it

  1. Among randomized PONTI pregnancies, NTD recurrence occurred in 0/14 with inositol plus folic acid versus 1/19 with placebo plus folic acid.

    Myo-inositol → Neural tube defect recurrence source_derived_draftungraded
    Experimental context and source evidence
    evidence_span
    {"source_cache": "artifacts/inositol-research/26847388.abstract.txt", "locator": "Exact primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "a7617d160ca71553f41ce2a7346478950ed9580a4bc9cca9688d3b710ec0cf82", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1680, "text_sha256": "a7617d160ca71553f41ce2a7346478950ed9580a4bc9cca9688d3b710ec0cf82"}
    experimental_model
    PONTI double-blind randomized pilot with separately described nonrandomized pregnancies
    exposure
    Periconceptional inositol plus folic acid versus folic acid plus placebo
    limitations
    47 women randomized; only 33 randomized pregnancies. The pilot was not powered to establish prevention. Corrigendum PMID 26917444 corrects the separate nonrandomized pregnancy count from 22 to 24; randomized counts used here are unchanged. Nonrandomized outcomes must not be pooled as randomized evidence.
    nutrient_topic
    Inositol research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · Inositol (stereoisomer family)
    organism
    Homo sapiens
    plain_language
    The pilot supported further study but was far too small to establish efficacy or replace folic acid.
    primary_references
    [ino-p26847388] Inositol for the prevention of neural tube defects: a pilot randomised controlled trial. (2016). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26847388/ DOI: 10.1017/s0007114515005322
    tissue_or_cell_type
    Women with a prior neural-tube-defect pregnancy

    Inositol: synthesis, signaling, mineral interactions and conditional deficiency (2026-09-17) · lines 1406–1417

    AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · PONTI double-blind randomized pilot with separately described nonrandomized pregnancies · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ### ino-ponti Among randomized PONTI pregnancies, NTD recurrence occurred in 0/14 with inositol plus folic acid versus 1/19 with placebo plus folic acid. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Inositol research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: The pilot supported further study but was far too small to establish efficacy or replace folic acid. organism: Homo sapiens tissue_or_cell_type: Women with a prior neural-tube-defect pregnancy experimental_model: PONTI double-blind randomized pilot with separately described nonrandomized pregnancies limitations: 47 women randomized; only 33 randomized pregnancies. The pilot was not powered to establish prevention. Corrigendum PMID 26917444 corrects the separate nonrandomized pregnancy count from 22 to 24; randomized counts used here are unchanged. Nonrandomized outcomes must not be pooled as randomized evidence. exposure: Periconceptional inositol plus folic acid versus folic acid plus placebo evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/inositol-research/26847388.abstract.txt", "locator": "Exact primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "a7617d160ca71553f41ce2a7346478950ed9580a4bc9cca9688d3b710ec0cf82", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1680, "text_sha256": "a7617d160ca71553f41ce2a7346478950ed9580a4bc9cca9688d3b710ec0cf82"} [ino-p26847388] Inositol for the prevention of neural tube defects: a pilot randomised controlled trial. (2016). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26847388/ DOI: 10.1017/s0007114515005322
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards