Component

Recovery of infused carbon label as expired carbon dioxide

Recovery of infused carbon label as expired carbon dioxide. Species, exposure and limitations are retained in each linked claim.

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What it acts on

  1. In postabsorptive volunteers 81.2% of infused label was recovered as labelled carbon dioxide from carbon-1 labelled acetate against 53.1% from carbon-2 labelled acetate, and in dogs recovery was 75.9% against 40.8%, leading to the conclusion that the position of the label in acetyl-CoA determines the extent to which oxidation of labelled acetyl-CoA is reflected in labelled carbon dioxide excretion.

    Experimental context and source evidence
    evidence_span
    {"source_cache": "artifacts/acetate-research/2106256.abstract.txt", "locator": "Indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "fc8e7ceab96e74e4664a17fce6b32ff0b498204a2c2c0df7437a4f6bfe1c5105", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1005, "text_sha256": "fc8e7ceab96e74e4664a17fce6b32ff0b498204a2c2c0df7437a4f6bfe1c5105"}
    experimental_model
    Carbon-labelled acetate infusion in four to six human volunteers and in anaesthetised dogs
    exposure
    Infusion of acetate labelled at carbon 1 or carbon 2, with recovery measured as labelled carbon dioxide
    limitations
    A methodological result. It applies to every tracer study of substrate oxidation in this collection and elsewhere, and it means such studies underestimate oxidation unless corrected.
    nutrient_topic
    Acetic acid research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct clinical effect, and the ingested acid is recorded separately from the circulating acetate anion. · Acetic acid
    organism
    Human and dog
    plain_language
    Where the label sits on the molecule changes how much comes back out as carbon dioxide, so tracer studies of acetate need correcting.
    primary_references
    [acetate-p2106256] Recovery of labeled CO2 during the infusion of C-1- vs C-2-labeled acetate: implications for tracer studies of substrate oxidation. (1990). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2106256/ DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/51.2.248
    tissue_or_cell_type
    Whole body

    Acetic acid: the ingested acid, the receptors acetate binds, the acetyl-CoA it becomes, and the acetyl groups that reach histones (2026-09-21) · lines 511–522

    AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Carbon-labelled acetate infusion in four to six human volunteers and in anaesthetised dogs · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ### acetate-label-position-matters In postabsorptive volunteers 81.2% of infused label was recovered as labelled carbon dioxide from carbon-1 labelled acetate against 53.1% from carbon-2 labelled acetate, and in dogs recovery was 75.9% against 40.8%, leading to the conclusion that the position of the label in acetyl-CoA determines the extent to which oxidation of labelled acetyl-CoA is reflected in labelled carbon dioxide excretion. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Acetic acid research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct clinical effect, and the ingested acid is recorded separately from the circulating acetate anion. plain_language: Where the label sits on the molecule changes how much comes back out as carbon dioxide, so tracer studies of acetate need correcting. organism: Human and dog tissue_or_cell_type: Whole body experimental_model: Carbon-labelled acetate infusion in four to six human volunteers and in anaesthetised dogs limitations: A methodological result. It applies to every tracer study of substrate oxidation in this collection and elsewhere, and it means such studies underestimate oxidation unless corrected. exposure: Infusion of acetate labelled at carbon 1 or carbon 2, with recovery measured as labelled carbon dioxide evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/acetate-research/2106256.abstract.txt", "locator": "Indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "fc8e7ceab96e74e4664a17fce6b32ff0b498204a2c2c0df7437a4f6bfe1c5105", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1005, "text_sha256": "fc8e7ceab96e74e4664a17fce6b32ff0b498204a2c2c0df7437a4f6bfe1c5105"} [acetate-p2106256] Recovery of labeled CO2 during the infusion of C-1- vs C-2-labeled acetate: implications for tracer studies of substrate oxidation. (1990). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2106256/ DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/51.2.248
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards