Component

Parent-rated behavior after blinded tartrazine challenge in selected children

Experimental model, exposure and limitations remain on each linked record.

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What acts on it

  1. The blinded challenge identified dose-related irritability, restlessness or sleep disturbance in a subset of the selected children.

    Experimental context and source evidence
    dose
    Placebo or tartrazine 1, 2, 5, 10, 20 or 50 mg each challenge morning
    duration
    21-day repeated-measures study; ratings for each 24 h
    evidence_access
    Primary PubMed abstract; unrecovered method details explicitly retained.
    evidence_scope
    literature_reviewed; source-specific experimental curation
    experimental_model
    Selected children aged 2-14 years: 34 suspected/uncertain reactors and 20 controls
    limitations
    Recruitment enriched for suspected reactions; parent ratings and individual-response classification do not prove universal effects or a mechanism mediated by zinc.
    nutrient_topic
    Tartrazine food-colorant chapter; nutrient, drug and peptide interactions retain their models and limits. · Tartrazine
    organism
    Selected children aged 2-14 years: 34 suspected/uncertain reactors and 20 controls
    plain_language
    The blinded challenge identified dose-related irritability, restlessness or sleep disturbance in a subset of the selected children.
    primary_references
    Synthetic food coloring and behavior: a dose response effect in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, repeated-measures study. (1994). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7965420/ DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(94)70059-1
    route
    Oral administration
    tissue
    Blinded parent-rated behavior

    Tartrazine: mechanisms, molecular forms and cross-actor connections (2026-09-20) · lines 314–323

    Original AI-assisted curation of eighteen primary studies. Study-specific citations, negative findings and limitations retained. Not publisher full text. · supports · Selected children aged 2-14 years: 34 suspected/uncertain reactors and 20 controls · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ## tartrazine-behavior-challenge The blinded challenge identified dose-related irritability, restlessness or sleep disturbance in a subset of the selected children. Model/species: Selected children aged 2-14 years: 34 suspected/uncertain reactors and 20 controls Tissue: Blinded parent-rated behavior Exposure: Placebo or tartrazine 1, 2, 5, 10, 20 or 50 mg each challenge morning Route: Oral administration Duration: 21-day repeated-measures study; ratings for each 24 h Limits: Recruitment enriched for suspected reactions; parent ratings and individual-response classification do not prove universal effects or a mechanism mediated by zinc. Primary reference: Synthetic food coloring and behavior: a dose response effect in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, repeated-measures study. (1994). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7965420/ DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(94)70059-1 Access: Primary PubMed abstract; unrecovered method details explicitly retained.
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards