Component

Human neonatal heel-lance Premature Infant Pain Profile score

Species, exposure, manipulation and limitations are specified on each linked claim.

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What acts on it

  1. Oral sucrose lowered the composite PIPP score after heel lance compared with water in the neonatal randomized trial.

    Experimental context and source evidence
    dose
    0.5 mL of 24% sucrose versus 0.5 mL sterile water
    duration
    2 minutes before lance; acute responses
    evidence_access
    Primary full-text methods/results and metadata inspected.
    evidence_scope
    literature_reviewed; source-specific curation
    experimental_model
    59 newborn infants randomized; 44 included in primary EEG analysis
    exposure_scope
    Neonatal sensory and nociceptive endpoints
    limitations
    Twenty sucrose and 24 water infants in primary EEG analysis. Different pain-related readouts are not interchangeable. Null EEG/reflex results are not universal clinical guidance; no opioid receptor mechanism was tested.
    nutrient_topic
    Sucrose chapter; direct sucrose observations are distinguished from shared component metabolism. · Sucrose
    organism
    59 newborn infants randomized; 44 included in primary EEG analysis
    plain_language
    Oral sucrose lowered the composite PIPP score after heel lance compared with water in the neonatal randomized trial.
    primary_references
    Oral sucrose as an analgesic drug for procedural pain in newborn infants: a randomised controlled trial. (2010). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20817247/ DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61303-7
    route
    Oral solution before clinically required heel lance
    tissue
    Heel-lance behavioral score, EEG and spinal reflex

    Sucrose: mechanism of action and metabolic impact (2026-09-20) · lines 475–485

    Original AI-assisted source-specific sucrose curation with shared canonical claims retained by identity. Primary-study citations, negative findings, exposure details and limitations preserved. Not publisher full text. · supports · 59 newborn infants randomized; 44 included in primary EEG analysis · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ## sucrose-neonatal-pipp Oral sucrose lowered the composite PIPP score after heel lance compared with water in the neonatal randomized trial. Model/species: 59 newborn infants randomized; 44 included in primary EEG analysis Tissue: Heel-lance behavioral score, EEG and spinal reflex Exposure: 0.5 mL of 24% sucrose versus 0.5 mL sterile water Route: Oral solution before clinically required heel lance Duration: 2 minutes before lance; acute responses Exposure scope: Neonatal sensory and nociceptive endpoints Limits: Twenty sucrose and 24 water infants in primary EEG analysis. Different pain-related readouts are not interchangeable. Null EEG/reflex results are not universal clinical guidance; no opioid receptor mechanism was tested. Reference: Oral sucrose as an analgesic drug for procedural pain in newborn infants: a randomised controlled trial. (2010). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20817247/ DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61303-7 Access: Primary full-text methods/results and metadata inspected.
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards