Component

Patient-reported lymphedema symptoms

Patient-reported lymphedema symptoms. Species, exposure and limitations are retained in each linked claim.

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What acts on it

  1. Moderate/large reported benefit occurred in 15% on coumarin versus 10% on placebo (P=0.19).

    Coumarin → Patient-reported lymphedema symptoms source_derived_draftungraded
    Experimental context and source evidence
    evidence_span
    {"source_cache": "artifacts/coumarin-research/9929524.abstract.txt", "locator": "Primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "6d6d4760bdd321dda87f82927c5dfcc7120ed963c101d799473ed53ff4c7764b", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1579, "text_sha256": "6d6d4760bdd321dda87f82927c5dfcc7120ed963c101d799473ed53ff4c7764b"}
    experimental_model
    Randomized placebo-controlled crossover replication trial
    exposure
    Coumarin 200 mg twice daily versus placebo, six months each
    limitations
    Specific disease population and pharmacological exposure; liver-test incidence cannot be extrapolated to food doses.
    nutrient_topic
    Coumarin research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · Coumarin
    organism
    Human
    plain_language
    Patient reports did not show a significant benefit.
    primary_references
    [coumarin-p9929524] Lack of effect of coumarin in women with lymphedema after treatment for breast cancer. (1999). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9929524/ DOI: 10.1056/nejm199902043400503
    tissue_or_cell_type
    140 women with chronic arm lymphedema after breast cancer treatment

    Coumarin: metabolism, signaling and nutrient connections (2026-09-17) · lines 774–785

    AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Randomized placebo-controlled crossover replication trial · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ### coumarin-symptoms-null Moderate/large reported benefit occurred in 15% on coumarin versus 10% on placebo (P=0.19). Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Coumarin research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: Patient reports did not show a significant benefit. organism: Human tissue_or_cell_type: 140 women with chronic arm lymphedema after breast cancer treatment experimental_model: Randomized placebo-controlled crossover replication trial limitations: Specific disease population and pharmacological exposure; liver-test incidence cannot be extrapolated to food doses. exposure: Coumarin 200 mg twice daily versus placebo, six months each evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/coumarin-research/9929524.abstract.txt", "locator": "Primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "6d6d4760bdd321dda87f82927c5dfcc7120ed963c101d799473ed53ff4c7764b", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1579, "text_sha256": "6d6d4760bdd321dda87f82927c5dfcc7120ed963c101d799473ed53ff4c7764b"} [coumarin-p9929524] Lack of effect of coumarin in women with lymphedema after treatment for breast cancer. (1999). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9929524/ DOI: 10.1056/nejm199902043400503
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards