Component
Performance after partial sleep restriction in the glycine study
Context-specific entity; species, compartment and exposure are stated on each claim.
1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.
How nutrients influence it
Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.
Other things that act on it
Enzymes, hormones, genes, and other components with a recorded effect. These are not nutrients, so they do not count toward the arrows above. Each finding names the chapter that recorded it.
How nutrients reach it in more than one step
Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.
Tracing routes…
What it does
Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.
What acts on it
In a randomized single-blind crossover study analyzing seven healthy men after partial sleep restriction, 3 g bedtime glycine improved reported fatigue and psychomotor vigilance measures.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Primary full text
- experimental_model
- Ten male company employees enrolled, seven analyzed; 25% sleep restriction for three nights, glycine or placebo 30 minutes before bed.
- limitations
- Small selected sample, short duration and industry setting limit generalization; rat SCN experiments do not prove the human mechanism.
- nutrient_topic
- Glycine collection; species, compartment, exposure, co-substrates and manipulation remain explicit. · Glycine
- plain_language
- A small human experiment measured next-day performance rather than proving a molecular pathway.
- primary_references
- The effects of glycine on subjective daytime performance in partially sleep-restricted healthy volunteers. · 2012 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22529837/ · DOI 10.3389/fneur.2012.00061
Glycine: supply, one-carbon allocation, receptors and cross-nutrient mechanisms (2026-09-19) · lines 426–432
AI-assisted research curation; primary references, access levels and experimental limitations individually identified. Not publisher full text. · supports · Ten male company employees enrolled, seven analyzed; 25% sleep restriction for three nights, glycine or placebo 30 minutes before bed. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
## glycine-sleep-human-outcomes A small human experiment measured next-day performance rather than proving a molecular pathway. In a randomized single-blind crossover study analyzing seven healthy men after partial sleep restriction, 3 g bedtime glycine improved reported fatigue and psychomotor vigilance measures. Model: Ten male company employees enrolled, seven analyzed; 25% sleep restriction for three nights, glycine or placebo 30 minutes before bed. Limitations: Small selected sample, short duration and industry setting limit generalization; rat SCN experiments do not prove the human mechanism. Evidence access: Primary full text The effects of glycine on subjective daytime performance in partially sleep-restricted healthy volunteers. · 2012 · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22529837/ · DOI 10.3389/fneur.2012.00061
Complete structured claim and evidence
The events it takes part in
A mechanism often involves more than two components. These are the full events, with every participant and its role.
Situations it appears in
Low-supply and faulty-machinery situations recorded in the chapters where this component plays a part.
In the sources
Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.
Open hypotheses
Proposed ideas that involve this component. They are labeled as hypotheses and do not change any recorded statement.
This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.