Component

Cognitive outcomes in the 24-week RA-extract Alzheimer trial

Cognitive outcomes in the 24-week RA-extract Alzheimer trial

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What acts on it

  1. The small Alzheimer extract trial found no significant between-group cognitive improvement.

    Experimental context and source evidence
    evidence_access
    Primary full text: relevant Results/Methods and figure descriptions reviewed; supplements only where explicitly stated.
    experimental_contrast
    {"intervention": "RA-rich lemon-balm extract", "comparator": "Placebo", "endpoint": "The small Alzheimer extract trial found no significant between-group cognitive improvement.", "effect_direction": "no_detected_change", "combination": "single", "conditions": []} Explicit extracted experimental comparison; recorded from source.
    experimental_model
    23 randomized patients; 500 mg RA/day in extract for 24 weeks.
    interpretation_status
    Recorded from source with stated access limits; ungraded, not independent replication.
    limitations
    Limited to the recorded preparation, model, exposure and endpoint. Does not establish a human dietary deficiency, clinical benefit or unique molecular mediation.
    nutrient_topic
    Rosmarinic acid collection; exact intervention and molecular form govern interpretation. · Rosmarinic acid
    plain_language
    The small Alzheimer extract trial found no significant between-group cognitive improvement.
    primary_references
    Safety and efficacy of Melissa officinalis extract containing rosmarinic acid in the prevention of Alzheimer's disease progression. | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33122694/ | https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7596544/ | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73729-2
    source_locator
    Reviewed reference ra-alz-cognition-null; Safety/tolerability was primary; cognition was secondary.

    Rosmarinic acid: detailed mechanisms of action (reviewed 10 October 2026) · lines 449–455

    AI-assisted original curation of primary studies; claim-local access and experimental limitations stated. Includes original-draft correction history. No independent replication claimed. · supports · 23 randomized patients; 500 mg RA/day in extract for 24 weeks. · Recorded from source · Recorded from source

    ### ra-alz-cognition-null The small Alzheimer extract trial found no significant between-group cognitive improvement. Safety/tolerability was primary; cognition was secondary. Model and exposure: 23 randomized patients; 500 mg RA/day in extract for 24 weeks. Limitations: Limited to the recorded preparation, model, exposure and endpoint. Does not establish a human dietary deficiency, clinical benefit or unique molecular mediation. Reference: Safety and efficacy of Melissa officinalis extract containing rosmarinic acid in the prevention of Alzheimer's disease progression. | 2020 | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33122694/ | https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7596544/ | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73729-2 | Access: Primary full text: relevant Results/Methods and figure descriptions reviewed; supplements only where explicitly stated.
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.