Component

Hippocampal neuronal damage after prolonged THC exposure

Hippocampal neuronal damage after prolonged THC exposure. Species, exposure and limitations are retained in each linked claim.

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What acts on it

  1. Prolonged THC administration produced hippocampal neurotoxicity in rats.

    Experimental context and source evidence
    evidence_span
    {"source_cache": "artifacts/thc-research/9651215.abstract.txt", "locator": "Indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "8e38fbb1327a18b89adb1a015aa7f59e7e60472a5f19bcf4032dbd2ba827be60", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 974, "text_sha256": "8e38fbb1327a18b89adb1a015aa7f59e7e60472a5f19bcf4032dbd2ba827be60"}
    experimental_model
    Prolonged THC administration with hippocampal histology
    exposure
    Chronic high-dose THC exposure
    limitations
    A structural damage endpoint at high chronic doses in rats. The doses are far above ordinary human exposure, which is the main limit on reading it across.
    nutrient_topic
    THC research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct clinical effect, and THC is recorded separately from the endocannabinoids it imitates. · Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol / THC
    organism
    Rat
    plain_language
    At high chronic doses in rats the same structure shows physical damage.
    primary_references
    [thc-p9651215] Hippocampal neurotoxicity of Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol. (1998). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9651215/ DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.18-14-05322.1998
    tissue_or_cell_type
    Hippocampus

    THC: the cannabinoid receptors, the endocannabinoid system it occupies, what the drug does, and the dietary fat it is built from (2026-09-21) · lines 478–489

    AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Prolonged THC administration with hippocampal histology · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ### thc-thc-hippocampal-damage Prolonged THC administration produced hippocampal neurotoxicity in rats. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: THC research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct clinical effect, and THC is recorded separately from the endocannabinoids it imitates. plain_language: At high chronic doses in rats the same structure shows physical damage. organism: Rat tissue_or_cell_type: Hippocampus experimental_model: Prolonged THC administration with hippocampal histology limitations: A structural damage endpoint at high chronic doses in rats. The doses are far above ordinary human exposure, which is the main limit on reading it across. exposure: Chronic high-dose THC exposure evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/thc-research/9651215.abstract.txt", "locator": "Indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "8e38fbb1327a18b89adb1a015aa7f59e7e60472a5f19bcf4032dbd2ba827be60", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 974, "text_sha256": "8e38fbb1327a18b89adb1a015aa7f59e7e60472a5f19bcf4032dbd2ba827be60"} [thc-p9651215] Hippocampal neurotoxicity of Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol. (1998). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9651215/ DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.18-14-05322.1998
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards