Component

Gap junction communication in human skin fibroblasts

Gap junction communication in human skin fibroblasts. Species, exposure and limitations are retained in each linked claim.

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What acts on it

  1. Lycopene at 0.1 micromolar stimulated gap-junction communication in human fetal skin fibroblasts.

    Experimental context and source evidence
    evidence_span
    {"source_cache": "artifacts/lycopene-research/10620348.abstract.txt", "locator": "Primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "dfd11c7c19dcd07e092a601ff44e9c900b5ecd717d3661ac2aca48d5cac72011", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1295, "text_sha256": "dfd11c7c19dcd07e092a601ff44e9c900b5ecd717d3661ac2aca48d5cac72011"}
    experimental_model
    Gap-junction and promoter/mRNA assays
    exposure
    Lycopene 0.1 micromolar; acyclo-retinoic acid 1 or 50 micromolar depending on endpoint
    limitations
    Communication, mRNA stability and RAR reporter responses are distinct; very high metabolite doses are not physiological proof.
    nutrient_topic
    Lycopene research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · Lycopene
    organism
    Human fetal skin fibroblasts and reporter systems
    plain_language
    Neighboring cells exchanged small signals more readily in this model.
    primary_references
    [lycopene-p10620348] Stimulation of gap junctional communication: comparison of acyclo-retinoic acid and lycopene. (2000). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10620348/ DOI: 10.1006/abbi.1999.1510
    tissue_or_cell_type
    Connexin-related intercellular communication

    Lycopene: absorption, metabolism, nutrient connections and human outcomes (2026-09-17) · lines 611–622

    AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Gap-junction and promoter/mRNA assays · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ### lycopene-gap-junction Lycopene at 0.1 micromolar stimulated gap-junction communication in human fetal skin fibroblasts. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Lycopene research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: Neighboring cells exchanged small signals more readily in this model. organism: Human fetal skin fibroblasts and reporter systems tissue_or_cell_type: Connexin-related intercellular communication experimental_model: Gap-junction and promoter/mRNA assays limitations: Communication, mRNA stability and RAR reporter responses are distinct; very high metabolite doses are not physiological proof. exposure: Lycopene 0.1 micromolar; acyclo-retinoic acid 1 or 50 micromolar depending on endpoint evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/lycopene-research/10620348.abstract.txt", "locator": "Primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "dfd11c7c19dcd07e092a601ff44e9c900b5ecd717d3661ac2aca48d5cac72011", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1295, "text_sha256": "dfd11c7c19dcd07e092a601ff44e9c900b5ecd717d3661ac2aca48d5cac72011"} [lycopene-p10620348] Stimulation of gap junctional communication: comparison of acyclo-retinoic acid and lycopene. (2000). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10620348/ DOI: 10.1006/abbi.1999.1510
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards