Component

Human fecal short-chain fatty acid concentrations

Human fecal short-chain fatty acid concentrations. Species, exposure and limitations are retained in each linked claim.

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What acts on it

  1. Fecal SCFA profiles were not significantly changed.

    Experimental context and source evidence
    evidence_span
    {"source_cache": "artifacts/pectin-research/31547291.abstract.txt", "locator": "Primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "cd2a4b1f6d299d573d8ea5077447bc45c8d8c6da58fa25c7835f01c5488d9db4", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1451, "text_sha256": "cd2a4b1f6d299d573d8ea5077447bc45c8d8c6da58fa25c7835f01c5488d9db4"}
    experimental_model
    Randomized placebo-controlled feeding; young and older healthy adults
    exposure
    15 g/day sugar beet pectin versus maltodextrin for four weeks
    limitations
    Related analysis of the same cohort as PMID31324040, not an independent replication. Fecal concentration is not production flux.
    nutrient_topic
    Pectin research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · Pectin, structurally heterogeneous plant polysaccharides
    organism
    Homo sapiens
    plain_language
    A stool SCFA concentration reflects production, use and absorption together.
    primary_references
    [pectin-p31547291] Sugar Beet Pectin Supplementation Did Not Alter Profiles of Fecal Microbiota and Exhaled Breath in Healthy Young Adults and Healthy Elderly. (2019). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31547291/ DOI: 10.3390/nu11092193
    tissue_or_cell_type
    Feces and microbial profiling

    Pectin: metabolism, signaling and nutrient connections (2026-09-17) · lines 1010–1021

    AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Randomized placebo-controlled feeding; young and older healthy adults · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ### pectin-human-scfa-null Fecal SCFA profiles were not significantly changed. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Pectin research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: A stool SCFA concentration reflects production, use and absorption together. organism: Homo sapiens tissue_or_cell_type: Feces and microbial profiling experimental_model: Randomized placebo-controlled feeding; young and older healthy adults limitations: Related analysis of the same cohort as PMID31324040, not an independent replication. Fecal concentration is not production flux. exposure: 15 g/day sugar beet pectin versus maltodextrin for four weeks evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/pectin-research/31547291.abstract.txt", "locator": "Primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "cd2a4b1f6d299d573d8ea5077447bc45c8d8c6da58fa25c7835f01c5488d9db4", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1451, "text_sha256": "cd2a4b1f6d299d573d8ea5077447bc45c8d8c6da58fa25c7835f01c5488d9db4"} [pectin-p31547291] Sugar Beet Pectin Supplementation Did Not Alter Profiles of Fecal Microbiota and Exhaled Breath in Healthy Young Adults and Healthy Elderly. (2019). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31547291/ DOI: 10.3390/nu11092193
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards