Component

Faecalibacterium duncaniae A2-165

Faecalibacterium duncaniae A2-165. Species, exposure and limitations are retained in each linked claim.

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What acts on it

  1. F. duncaniae A2-165 grew better in co-cultures supplied with HG-rich pectins.

    Experimental context and source evidence
    evidence_span
    {"source_cache": "artifacts/pectin-research/40439696.abstract.txt", "locator": "Primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "40b7f781968c7c518a5e367801c9d2b71aee4cf5c57d04bc51178e57c4bc8bf8", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1667, "text_sha256": "40b7f781968c7c518a5e367801c9d2b71aee4cf5c57d04bc51178e57c4bc8bf8"}
    experimental_model
    23 human gut bacterial isolates and synthetic co-cultures
    exposure
    Pectins from different plant sources
    limitations
    Growth and inferred cross-feeding do not measure clinical benefit; strain competition depends on culture and substrate.
    nutrient_topic
    Pectin research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · Pectin, structurally heterogeneous plant polysaccharides
    organism
    Specified bacterial strains isolated from humans
    plain_language
    The backbone composition affected which cross-feeder benefited.
    primary_references
    [pectin-p40439696] Roles of human colonic bacteria in pectin utilization and associated cross-feeding networks revealed using synthetic co-cultures. (2025). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40439696/ DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.001559
    tissue_or_cell_type
    Anaerobic culture

    Pectin: metabolism, signaling and nutrient connections (2026-09-17) · lines 984–995

    AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · 23 human gut bacterial isolates and synthetic co-cultures · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ### pectin-faecali-crossfeeding F. duncaniae A2-165 grew better in co-cultures supplied with HG-rich pectins. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Pectin research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: The backbone composition affected which cross-feeder benefited. organism: Specified bacterial strains isolated from humans tissue_or_cell_type: Anaerobic culture experimental_model: 23 human gut bacterial isolates and synthetic co-cultures limitations: Growth and inferred cross-feeding do not measure clinical benefit; strain competition depends on culture and substrate. exposure: Pectins from different plant sources evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/pectin-research/40439696.abstract.txt", "locator": "Primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "40b7f781968c7c518a5e367801c9d2b71aee4cf5c57d04bc51178e57c4bc8bf8", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1667, "text_sha256": "40b7f781968c7c518a5e367801c9d2b71aee4cf5c57d04bc51178e57c4bc8bf8"} [pectin-p40439696] Roles of human colonic bacteria in pectin utilization and associated cross-feeding networks revealed using synthetic co-cultures. (2025). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40439696/ DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.001559
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards