Component

One-third distal radius bone mineral density

One-third distal radius bone mineral density. Species, exposure and limitations are retained in each linked claim.

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What acts on it

  1. MK-7 produced greater one-third distal-radius BMD loss than placebo: change difference -0.023 g/cm2, 95% CI -0.039 to -0.008.

    Experimental context and source evidence
    evidence_span
    {"source_cache": "artifacts/k2-research/36460034.abstract.txt", "locator": "Exact primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "7a8ad2542116a1ddc804eead1694c7057dfaff243eacb993c6c39745e73264a0", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1754, "text_sha256": "7a8ad2542116a1ddc804eead1694c7057dfaff243eacb993c6c39745e73264a0"}
    experimental_model
    Two-year randomized double-blind RenaKvit trial
    exposure
    MK-7 360 micrograms/day versus placebo
    limitations
    Kidney-disease context and substantial attrition; site-specific findings cannot be condensed into universal bone benefit or harm.
    nutrient_topic
    Vitamin K2 research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · Vitamin K2 / menaquinone family
    organism
    123 chronic-dialysis patients randomized
    plain_language
    One skeletal site had a worse result despite improved vitamin K markers.
    primary_references
    [k2-p36460034] Vitamin K supplementation and bone mineral density in dialysis: results of the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled RenaKvit trial. (2023). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36460034/ DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfac315
    tissue_or_cell_type
    Site-specific BMD

    Vitamin K2: menaquinone forms, carboxylation, recycling and nutrient interactions (2026-09-17) · lines 1124–1135

    AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Two-year randomized double-blind RenaKvit trial · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ### k2-dialysis-radius MK-7 produced greater one-third distal-radius BMD loss than placebo: change difference -0.023 g/cm2, 95% CI -0.039 to -0.008. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Vitamin K2 research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: One skeletal site had a worse result despite improved vitamin K markers. organism: 123 chronic-dialysis patients randomized tissue_or_cell_type: Site-specific BMD experimental_model: Two-year randomized double-blind RenaKvit trial limitations: Kidney-disease context and substantial attrition; site-specific findings cannot be condensed into universal bone benefit or harm. exposure: MK-7 360 micrograms/day versus placebo evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/k2-research/36460034.abstract.txt", "locator": "Exact primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "7a8ad2542116a1ddc804eead1694c7057dfaff243eacb993c6c39745e73264a0", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1754, "text_sha256": "7a8ad2542116a1ddc804eead1694c7057dfaff243eacb993c6c39745e73264a0"} [k2-p36460034] Vitamin K supplementation and bone mineral density in dialysis: results of the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled RenaKvit trial. (2023). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36460034/ DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfac315
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards