Component

Clinical Dementia Rating score

Independent substance, clinical endpoint or measured readout; study context is retained with each finding.

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What acts on it

  1. At 27 months, groups did not differ significantly in change in Clinical Dementia Rating or neuropsychological test z-scores.

    Methylcobalamin → Clinical Dementia Rating score source_derived_draftungraded
    Experimental context and source evidence
    availability_state
    biomarker_context Imported condition classification; unverified.
    experimental_model
    Randomized placebo-controlled trial: 271 nondemented diabetic outpatients aged at least 70, plasma B12 150–300 pmol/L.
    exposure
    Oral methylcobalamin 1000 micrograms/day versus placebo for 27 months.
    limitations
    More smokers were randomized to active treatment; excluding smokers did not change the reported result.
    nutrient_topic
    Vitamin B12 research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · Vitamin B12 (cobalamins)
    organism
    Homo sapiens
    plain_language
    Better markers did not establish protection from cognitive decline in this group.
    primary_references
    [b12-kwok2017] A randomized placebo controlled trial of vitamin B12 supplementation to prevent cognitive decline in older diabetic people with borderline low serum vitamin B12 (2017). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27823800/ DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.10.018
    tissue_or_cell_type
    Human blood or whole-person endpoints
    trigger_kind
    biomarker_context Imported condition classification; unverified.

    Vitamin B12: mechanisms, deficiency and nutrient interactions (2026-09-17) · lines 1573–1583

    AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Randomized placebo-controlled trial: 271 nondemented diabetic outpatients aged at least 70, plasma B12 150–300 pmol/L. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ### b12-methylcobalamin-diabetes-cognition At 27 months, groups did not differ significantly in change in Clinical Dementia Rating or neuropsychological test z-scores. Condition category: biomarker_context nutrient_topic: Vitamin B12 research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: Better markers did not establish protection from cognitive decline in this group. organism: Homo sapiens tissue_or_cell_type: Human blood or whole-person endpoints experimental_model: Randomized placebo-controlled trial: 271 nondemented diabetic outpatients aged at least 70, plasma B12 150–300 pmol/L. limitations: More smokers were randomized to active treatment; excluding smokers did not change the reported result. exposure: Oral methylcobalamin 1000 micrograms/day versus placebo for 27 months. [b12-kwok2017] A randomized placebo controlled trial of vitamin B12 supplementation to prevent cognitive decline in older diabetic people with borderline low serum vitamin B12 (2017). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27823800/ DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.10.018
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards