Component

Regression of cervical intraepithelial lesions

Regression of cervical intraepithelial lesions. Species, exposure and limitations are retained in each linked claim.

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What acts on it

  1. The pilot study found no statistically significant difference between DIM and placebo on its reported outcomes.

    Experimental context and source evidence
    evidence_span
    {"source_cache": "artifacts/dim-research/19939441.abstract.txt", "locator": "Primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "ba95e25bccf862a414ecb9d5b54d2c95f19d76f5c2bc5cb5176ec31e635c5777", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 2504, "text_sha256": "ba95e25bccf862a414ecb9d5b54d2c95f19d76f5c2bc5cb5176ec31e635c5777"}
    experimental_model
    Randomized placebo-controlled pilot trial
    exposure
    Oral DIM approximately 2 mg/kg/day for 12 weeks
    limitations
    Incomplete follow-up biopsies and improvement in both arms; no statistically significant group difference.
    nutrient_topic
    Diindolylmethane (DIM) research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · 3,3'-Diindolylmethane / DIM
    organism
    64 women enrolled; 60 available for analysis
    plain_language
    Improvement within a treated group is not proof that the treatment caused it.
    primary_references
    [dim-p19939441] Oral diindolylmethane (DIM): pilot evaluation of a nonsurgical treatment for cervical dysplasia. (2010). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19939441/ DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.10.060
    tissue_or_cell_type
    Biopsy-confirmed CIN2/3

    Diindolylmethane (DIM): formation, receptor signaling, metabolism and drug interactions (2026-09-17) · lines 1195–1206

    AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Randomized placebo-controlled pilot trial · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ### dim-cervical-pilot-null The pilot study found no statistically significant difference between DIM and placebo on its reported outcomes. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Diindolylmethane (DIM) research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: Improvement within a treated group is not proof that the treatment caused it. organism: 64 women enrolled; 60 available for analysis tissue_or_cell_type: Biopsy-confirmed CIN2/3 experimental_model: Randomized placebo-controlled pilot trial limitations: Incomplete follow-up biopsies and improvement in both arms; no statistically significant group difference. exposure: Oral DIM approximately 2 mg/kg/day for 12 weeks evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/dim-research/19939441.abstract.txt", "locator": "Primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "ba95e25bccf862a414ecb9d5b54d2c95f19d76f5c2bc5cb5176ec31e635c5777", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 2504, "text_sha256": "ba95e25bccf862a414ecb9d5b54d2c95f19d76f5c2bc5cb5176ec31e635c5777"} [dim-p19939441] Oral diindolylmethane (DIM): pilot evaluation of a nonsurgical treatment for cervical dysplasia. (2010). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19939441/ DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.10.060
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards