Component

AREDS2 composite cognitive function score

AREDS2 composite cognitive function score. Species, exposure and limitations are retained in each linked claim.

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What acts on it

  1. L+Z produced no significant difference in yearly cognitive composite change: 0.03 (99% CI −0.14 to 0.19; P=0.66).

    Experimental context and source evidence
    evidence_span
    {"source_cache": "artifacts/lutein-research/26305649.abstract.txt", "locator": "Primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "6b4498bace6ac4564fae52aef2f95e564154631bdfa1e19b02fa6878043dbe72", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 2936, "text_sha256": "6b4498bace6ac4564fae52aef2f95e564154631bdfa1e19b02fa6878043dbe72"}
    experimental_model
    AREDS2 ancillary randomized cognitive study
    exposure
    L+Z 10/2 mg daily; five-year study on background nutrient formulas
    limitations
    Cognitive outcome, not a direct brain-lutein assay; no attribution to isolated lutein.
    nutrient_topic
    Lutein research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · Lutein
    organism
    3501 tested older participants at AMD risk
    plain_language
    The large older-adult study did not show cognitive benefit.
    primary_references
    [lutein-p26305649] Effect of Omega-3 Fatty Acids, Lutein/Zeaxanthin, or Other Nutrient Supplementation on Cognitive Function: The AREDS2 Randomized Clinical Trial. (2015). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26305649/ DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.9677
    tissue_or_cell_type
    Telephone cognitive test battery

    Lutein: metabolism, signaling and nutrient connections (2026-09-17) · lines 892–903

    AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · AREDS2 ancillary randomized cognitive study · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ### lutein-cognition-areds-null L+Z produced no significant difference in yearly cognitive composite change: 0.03 (99% CI −0.14 to 0.19; P=0.66). Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Lutein research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: The large older-adult study did not show cognitive benefit. organism: 3501 tested older participants at AMD risk tissue_or_cell_type: Telephone cognitive test battery experimental_model: AREDS2 ancillary randomized cognitive study limitations: Cognitive outcome, not a direct brain-lutein assay; no attribution to isolated lutein. exposure: L+Z 10/2 mg daily; five-year study on background nutrient formulas evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/lutein-research/26305649.abstract.txt", "locator": "Primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "6b4498bace6ac4564fae52aef2f95e564154631bdfa1e19b02fa6878043dbe72", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 2936, "text_sha256": "6b4498bace6ac4564fae52aef2f95e564154631bdfa1e19b02fa6878043dbe72"} [lutein-p26305649] Effect of Omega-3 Fatty Acids, Lutein/Zeaxanthin, or Other Nutrient Supplementation on Cognitive Function: The AREDS2 Randomized Clinical Trial. (2015). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26305649/ DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.9677
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards