Component
Human HAM-A score in the 2009 chamomile trial
Human HAM-A score in the 2009 chamomile trial
1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.
How nutrients influence it
Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.
Other things that act on it
Enzymes, hormones, genes, and other components with a recorded effect. These are not nutrients, so they do not count toward the arrows above. Each finding names the chapter that recorded it.
How nutrients reach it in more than one step
Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.
Tracing routes…
What it does
Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.
What acts on it
The eight-week chamomile trial found greater reduction of HAM-A scores than placebo, with primary comparison P=0.047.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Indexed primary abstract/metadata only; unextracted doses, figures and methods remain unknown.
- experimental_contrast
- {"intervention": "Chamomile extract", "comparator": "Placebo", "endpoint": "The eight-week chamomile trial found greater reduction of HAM-A scores than placebo, with primary comparison P=0.047.", "effect_direction": "decrease", "combination": "single", "conditions": []} Explicit extracted experimental comparison; recorded from source.
- experimental_model
- 57 randomized participants, 28 extract and 29 placebo; mild-to-moderate generalized anxiety.
- interpretation_status
- Recorded from source with stated access limits; ungraded, not independent replication.
- limitations
- Limited to the recorded preparation, model, exposure and endpoint. Does not establish a human dietary deficiency, clinical benefit or unique molecular mediation.
- nutrient_topic
- Apigenin collection; exact intervention and molecular form govern interpretation. · Apigenin
- plain_language
- The eight-week chamomile trial found greater reduction of HAM-A scores than placebo, with primary comparison P=0.047.
- primary_references
- A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of oral Matricaria recutita (chamomile) extract therapy for generalized anxiety disorder. | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19593179/ | https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3600416/ | https://doi.org/10.1097/jcp.0b013e3181ac935c
- source_locator
- Reviewed reference api-chamomile-gad2009; The active constituent was not isolated; this does not establish apigenin monotherapy efficacy.
Apigenin: detailed mechanisms of action (reviewed 10 October 2026) · lines 812–818
AI-assisted original curation of primary studies; claim-local access and experimental limitations stated. Includes original-draft correction history. No independent replication claimed. · supports · 57 randomized participants, 28 extract and 29 placebo; mild-to-moderate generalized anxiety. · Recorded from source · Recorded from source
### api-chamomile-gad2009 The eight-week chamomile trial found greater reduction of HAM-A scores than placebo, with primary comparison P=0.047. The active constituent was not isolated; this does not establish apigenin monotherapy efficacy. Model and exposure: 57 randomized participants, 28 extract and 29 placebo; mild-to-moderate generalized anxiety. Limitations: Limited to the recorded preparation, model, exposure and endpoint. Does not establish a human dietary deficiency, clinical benefit or unique molecular mediation. Reference: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of oral Matricaria recutita (chamomile) extract therapy for generalized anxiety disorder. | 2009 | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19593179/ | https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3600416/ | https://doi.org/10.1097/jcp.0b013e3181ac935c | Access: Indexed primary abstract/metadata only; unextracted doses, figures and methods remain unknown.
Complete structured claim and evidence
The events it takes part in
A mechanism often involves more than two components. These are the full events, with every participant and its role.
Situations it appears in
Low-supply and faulty-machinery situations recorded in the chapters where this component plays a part.
In the sources
Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.
Open hypotheses
Proposed ideas that involve this component. They are labeled as hypotheses and do not change any recorded statement.
This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.