Component

Acute respiratory tract infection incidence

Study-defined Acute respiratory tract infection incidence. Read each linked record for species, exposure and endpoint.

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What acts on it

  1. At least one confirmed respiratory infection occurred in 4.6% of no-offer, 5.7% of lower-dose-offer and 5.0% of higher-dose-offer participants; ORs 1.26 (95% CI0.96–1.66) and 1.09 (0.82–1.46).

    Experimental context and source evidence
    cross_nutrient
    false
    experimental_model
    CORONAVIT pragmatic randomized open-label offer-to-test-and-treat trial; 6200UKadults≥ 16
    exposure
    Offer 800 or 3200 IU/day vitamin D for 6 months if 25(OH)D<75 nmol/L versus no offer; 2674 of 3100 offered received supplements.
    limitations
    Open-label strategy trial; receipt, outside supplementation and pandemic context limit inference about specific cellular mechanisms or all dosing regimens.
    nutrient_topic
    Vitamin D2 and D3 research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · Vitamin D2 and D3
    organism
    Homo sapiens
    plain_language
    Offering this test-and-supplement strategy did not reduce confirmed respiratory infections.
    primary_references
    [jolliffe2022] Effect of a test-and-treat approach to vitamin D supplementation on risk of all cause acute respiratory tract infection and covid-19: phase 3 randomised controlled trial (CORONAVIT). (2022). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36215226/ DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071230
    tissue_or_cell_type
    Clinical respiratory outcomes

    Vitamin D2 and D3: mechanisms, deficiency and nutrient interactions (2026-09-17) · lines 1652–1663

    AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · CORONAVIT pragmatic randomized open-label offer-to-test-and-treat trial; 6200UKadults≥ 16 · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ### vd-coronavit-ari At least one confirmed respiratory infection occurred in 4.6% of no-offer, 5.7% of lower-dose-offer and 5.0% of higher-dose-offer participants; ORs 1.26 (95% CI0.96–1.66) and 1.09 (0.82–1.46). Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Vitamin D2 and D3 research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: Offering this test-and-supplement strategy did not reduce confirmed respiratory infections. organism: Homo sapiens tissue_or_cell_type: Clinical respiratory outcomes experimental_model: CORONAVIT pragmatic randomized open-label offer-to-test-and-treat trial; 6200UKadults≥ 16 limitations: Open-label strategy trial; receipt, outside supplementation and pandemic context limit inference about specific cellular mechanisms or all dosing regimens. exposure: Offer 800 or 3200 IU/day vitamin D for 6 months if 25(OH)D<75 nmol/L versus no offer; 2674 of 3100 offered received supplements. cross_nutrient: false [jolliffe2022] Effect of a test-and-treat approach to vitamin D supplementation on risk of all cause acute respiratory tract infection and covid-19: phase 3 randomised controlled trial (CORONAVIT). (2022). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36215226/ DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071230
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards