Component
Stimulated serum C-peptide after a mixed-meal tolerance test
Stimulated serum C-peptide after a mixed-meal tolerance test. Species, exposure and limitations are retained in each linked claim.
1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.
How nutrients influence it
Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.
Other things that act on it
Enzymes, hormones, genes, and other components with a recorded effect. These are not nutrients, so they do not count toward the arrows above. Each finding names the chapter that recorded it.
How nutrients reach it in more than one step
Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.
Tracing routes…
What it does
Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.
What acts on it
We studied 334 patients aged 10 to 20 years with type 1 diabetes, fasting C-peptide levels of more than 0.3 nanograms per millilitre and detectable serum GAD65 autoantibodies, randomly assigned within 3 months after diagnosis to four doses of GAD-alum, two doses followed by two doses of placebo, or four doses of placebo, the stimulated C-peptide level declined to a similar degree in all study groups and the primary outcome at 15 months did not differ significantly between the combined active-drug groups and the placebo group with P = 0.10, and the use of GAD-alum did not affect the insulin dose, glycated haemoglobin level or hypoglycaemia rate.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_span
- {"source_cache": "artifacts/gaba-research/22296077.abstract.txt", "locator": "Indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "fc3bf9a083b3179c8573e993fb61f09412eca7890c3ccfb3ba5b8c0fb26acce8", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1683, "text_sha256": "fc3bf9a083b3179c8573e993fb61f09412eca7890c3ccfb3ba5b8c0fb26acce8"}
- experimental_model
- Randomised placebo-controlled trial of an alum-formulated autoantigen in 334 patients within three months of diagnosis
- exposure
- Four doses of GAD-alum, two doses followed by placebo, or four doses of placebo, in patients aged 10 to 20 with detectable GAD65 autoantibodies
- limitations
- A properly powered randomised trial with stimulated C-peptide as the primary outcome. It tests the autoantigen as a therapy, not GABA.
- nutrient_topic
- GABA research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct clinical effect, and the sign of a GABA response depends on the chloride gradient of the cell it was measured in. · Gamma-aminobutyric acid
- organism
- Human
- plain_language
- Vaccinating against the enzyme the immune system attacks did not slow the loss of insulin production.
- primary_references
- [gb-p22296077] GAD65 antigen therapy in recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes mellitus. (2012). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22296077/ DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1107096
- tissue_or_cell_type
- Pancreatic beta cell function
AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Randomised placebo-controlled trial of an alum-formulated autoantigen in 334 patients within three months of diagnosis · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
### gb-targeting-the-autoantigen-did-not-work We studied 334 patients aged 10 to 20 years with type 1 diabetes, fasting C-peptide levels of more than 0.3 nanograms per millilitre and detectable serum GAD65 autoantibodies, randomly assigned within 3 months after diagnosis to four doses of GAD-alum, two doses followed by two doses of placebo, or four doses of placebo, the stimulated C-peptide level declined to a similar degree in all study groups and the primary outcome at 15 months did not differ significantly between the combined active-drug groups and the placebo group with P = 0.10, and the use of GAD-alum did not affect the insulin dose, glycated haemoglobin level or hypoglycaemia rate. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: GABA research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct clinical effect, and the sign of a GABA response depends on the chloride gradient of the cell it was measured in. plain_language: Vaccinating against the enzyme the immune system attacks did not slow the loss of insulin production. organism: Human tissue_or_cell_type: Pancreatic beta cell function experimental_model: Randomised placebo-controlled trial of an alum-formulated autoantigen in 334 patients within three months of diagnosis limitations: A properly powered randomised trial with stimulated C-peptide as the primary outcome. It tests the autoantigen as a therapy, not GABA. exposure: Four doses of GAD-alum, two doses followed by placebo, or four doses of placebo, in patients aged 10 to 20 with detectable GAD65 autoantibodies evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/gaba-research/22296077.abstract.txt", "locator": "Indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "fc3bf9a083b3179c8573e993fb61f09412eca7890c3ccfb3ba5b8c0fb26acce8", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1683, "text_sha256": "fc3bf9a083b3179c8573e993fb61f09412eca7890c3ccfb3ba5b8c0fb26acce8"} [gb-p22296077] GAD65 antigen therapy in recently diagnosed type 1 diabetes mellitus. (2012). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22296077/ DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1107096
Complete structured claim and evidence
The events it takes part in
A mechanism often involves more than two components. These are the full events, with every participant and its role.
Situations it appears in
Low-supply and faulty-machinery situations recorded in the chapters where this component plays a part.
In the sources
Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.
Open hypotheses
Proposed ideas that involve this component. They are labeled as hypotheses and do not change any recorded statement.
This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.