Component
Renal ascorbate fractional excretion
Renal ascorbate fractional excretion
1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.
How nutrients influence it
Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.
Other things that act on it
Enzymes, hormones, genes, and other components with a recorded effect. These are not nutrients, so they do not count toward the arrows above. Each finding names the chapter that recorded it.
How nutrients reach it in more than one step
Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.
Tracing routes…
What it does
Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.
What acts on it
Slc23a1 deletion raised renal ascorbate fractional excretion about 16–18-fold in female mice and 6–7-fold in males; female reabsorption was essentially abolished.
Experimental context and source evidence
- availability_state
- machinery_impairment Imported condition classification; unverified.
- cross_nutrient
- false
- experimental_model
- Slc23a1 knockout mice and wild-type controls
- exposure
- Slc23a1 knockout versus wild type
- limitations
- Sex-specific renal clearances; inulin clearance was unchanged. This is transporter loss, not low intake.
- nutrient_topic
- Vitamin C research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · Vitamin C
- organism
- Mus musculus
- plain_language
- Removing SVCT1 made mice lose more filtered vitamin C in urine.
- primary_references
- [corpe2010] Vitamin C transporter Slc23a1 links renal reabsorption, vitamin C tissue accumulation, and perinatal survival in mice. (2010). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20200446/ DOI: 10.1172/jci39191
- tissue_or_cell_type
- Kidney
- trigger_kind
- machinery_impairment Imported condition classification; unverified.
Vitamin C: mechanisms, deficiency and nutrient interactions (2026-09-17) · lines 143–154
AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Slc23a1 knockout mice and wild-type controls · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
### vc-transport-svct1-renal-loss Slc23a1 deletion raised renal ascorbate fractional excretion about 16–18-fold in female mice and 6–7-fold in males; female reabsorption was essentially abolished. Condition category: machinery_impairment nutrient_topic: Vitamin C research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: Removing SVCT1 made mice lose more filtered vitamin C in urine. organism: Mus musculus tissue_or_cell_type: Kidney experimental_model: Slc23a1 knockout mice and wild-type controls limitations: Sex-specific renal clearances; inulin clearance was unchanged. This is transporter loss, not low intake. exposure: Slc23a1 knockout versus wild type cross_nutrient: false [corpe2010] Vitamin C transporter Slc23a1 links renal reabsorption, vitamin C tissue accumulation, and perinatal survival in mice. (2010). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20200446/ DOI: 10.1172/jci39191
Complete structured claim and evidence
The events it takes part in
A mechanism often involves more than two components. These are the full events, with every participant and its role.
Situations it appears in
Low-supply and faulty-machinery situations recorded in the chapters where this component plays a part.
In the sources
Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.
Open hypotheses
Proposed ideas that involve this component. They are labeled as hypotheses and do not change any recorded statement.
This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.