Component

Erythrocyte reduced, oxidized and ratio glutathione measures in the 2011 trial

Erythrocyte reduced, oxidized and ratio glutathione measures in the 2011 trial. Species, exposure and limitations are retained in each linked claim.

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What acts on it

  1. Oral GSH did not significantly change erythrocyte reduced, oxidized or ratio glutathione measures.

    Experimental context and source evidence
    evidence_span
    {"source_cache": "artifacts/glutathione-research/21875351.abstract.txt", "locator": "Primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "d6f87d899397204e2bfb9a70e2262ccdd14364350668fbb50906662149fc4f69", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 2042, "text_sha256": "d6f87d899397204e2bfb9a70e2262ccdd14364350668fbb50906662149fc4f69"}
    experimental_model
    Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial
    exposure
    GSH 500 mg twice daily for four weeks
    limitations
    Trial-specific null results; not proof that every dose, duration or formulation is inactive.
    nutrient_topic
    Glutathione research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · GSH
    organism
    Human
    plain_language
    The tested supplement did not improve this measured endpoint.
    primary_references
    [glutathione-p21875351] Effects of oral glutathione supplementation on systemic oxidative stress biomarkers in human volunteers. (2011). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21875351/ DOI: 10.1089/acm.2010.0716
    tissue_or_cell_type
    40 healthy adults; 39 completed

    Glutathione: metabolism, signaling and nutrient connections (2026-09-17) · lines 1139–1150

    AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ### glutathione-oral-2011-null Oral GSH did not significantly change erythrocyte reduced, oxidized or ratio glutathione measures. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Glutathione research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: The tested supplement did not improve this measured endpoint. organism: Human tissue_or_cell_type: 40 healthy adults; 39 completed experimental_model: Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial limitations: Trial-specific null results; not proof that every dose, duration or formulation is inactive. exposure: GSH 500 mg twice daily for four weeks evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/glutathione-research/21875351.abstract.txt", "locator": "Primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "d6f87d899397204e2bfb9a70e2262ccdd14364350668fbb50906662149fc4f69", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 2042, "text_sha256": "d6f87d899397204e2bfb9a70e2262ccdd14364350668fbb50906662149fc4f69"} [glutathione-p21875351] Effects of oral glutathione supplementation on systemic oxidative stress biomarkers in human volunteers. (2011). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21875351/ DOI: 10.1089/acm.2010.0716
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards