Component

Rat serum shikimate detection in the Mesnage assay

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What acts on it

  1. Serum shikimate was not detected by the reported analytical method in the 90-day study.

    Experimental context and source evidence
    evidence_access
    Primary full text retrieved; relevant methods/results/figures reviewed. Selective extraction, not raw-data reanalysis or exhaustive supplemental extraction.
    experimental_model
    Rat serum assay with matrix and sensitivity limitations.
    interpretation_status
    Source-derived extraction of a fact-checked reference; access is explicit, not independent raw-data verification.
    limitations
    Non-detection is not zero concentration, proof of no absorption or a measured decline.
    plain_language
    Serum shikimate was not detected by the reported analytical method in the 90-day study.
    primary_references
    Use of Shotgun Metagenomics and Metabolomics to Evaluate the Impact of Glyphosate or Roundup MON 52276 on the Gut Microbiota and Serum Metabolome of Sprague-Dawley Rats. | 2021 | DOI 10.1289/ehp6990 | PMID 33502259 | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33502259/ | https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp6990 | https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7839352/
    source_locator
    Reviewed reference lines 37-37; exact primary location described in quoted passage where extracted.

    Shikimic acid: detailed mechanisms of action (reviewed 5 October 2026) · lines 37–37

    Original AI-assisted review of primary studies and, where relevant, official regulatory records. Access level is retained per claim. Corrections, null results and unresolved questions remain explicit. Not publisher full text or independent replication. · supports · Rat serum assay with matrix and sensitivity limitations. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    **An upstream pool can rise when flux is blocked.** Mesnage 2021 compared pure glyphosate and Roundup MON52276 in female Sprague–Dawley rats for 90 days at 0.5, 50 and 175 mg/kg/day glyphosate-equivalent exposures, with 12 animals per group. Cecal shikimate and DHS accumulation supported pathway inhibition; abundance alone was less informative. The collection records study-level accumulation rather than asserting every dose had an identical significant effect. Overall alpha-diversity differences were not significant (p=0.09), while beta diversity differed. Selected low-abundance taxa changed, and formulation-specific differences remained. Serum shikimate was undetected with the employed method, whose sensitivity and protein interference limit a zero-exposure interpretation. [Use of Shotgun Metagenomics and Metabolomics to Evaluate the Impact of Glyphosate or Roundup MON 52276 on the Gut Microbiota and Serum Metabolome of Sprague-Dawley Rats.](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33502259/)
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.