Component

Prostate cancer-cell viability

Viability of prostate cancer cell cultures measured using specified assays.

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What acts on it

  1. Supplementing RPMI/FCS with as little as 5 µM iron as FAC prevented the marked viability loss caused by 5–10 mM ascorbate in LNCaP and PC-3 cultures; protection also occurred at higher tested iron additions.

    Experimental context and source evidence
    cross_nutrient
    true
    evidence_location
    Figure 1a–b; treatment Methods
    experimental_model
    Human LNCaP and PC-3 monolayers in RPMI-1640 +10% FCS; MTT and crystal-violet viability assays
    exposure
    5 or 10 mM freshly neutralized ascorbic acid, 2 h, then wash/recovery; FAC adds 5–30 µM iron to medium containing 5.6 ±1.3 µM total iron.
    limitations
    FAC supplementation changes iron speciation as well as concentration; matching plasma total iron does not reconstruct transferrin binding or tissue interstitial chemistry. No clinical efficacy conclusion.
    nutrient_topic
    Vitamin C research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · Vitamin C
    organism
    Homo sapiens
    plain_language
    In this medium, extra iron protected the prostate cancer cells from high-concentration vitamin C.
    primary_references
    [c-reg-mojic] Extracellular iron diminishes anticancer effects of vitamin C: an in vitro study. (2014). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25092529/ DOI: 10.1038/srep05955
    tissue_or_cell_type
    Prostate carcinoma cells

    Vitamin C: mechanisms, deficiency and nutrient interactions (2026-09-17) · lines 1285–1297

    AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Human LNCaP and PC-3 monolayers in RPMI-1640 +10% FCS; MTT and crystal-violet viability assays · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ### c-reg-extracellular-iron-cytoprotection Supplementing RPMI/FCS with as little as 5 µM iron as FAC prevented the marked viability loss caused by 5–10 mM ascorbate in LNCaP and PC-3 cultures; protection also occurred at higher tested iron additions. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Vitamin C research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: In this medium, extra iron protected the prostate cancer cells from high-concentration vitamin C. organism: Homo sapiens tissue_or_cell_type: Prostate carcinoma cells experimental_model: Human LNCaP and PC-3 monolayers in RPMI-1640 +10% FCS; MTT and crystal-violet viability assays limitations: FAC supplementation changes iron speciation as well as concentration; matching plasma total iron does not reconstruct transferrin binding or tissue interstitial chemistry. No clinical efficacy conclusion. exposure: 5 or 10 mM freshly neutralized ascorbic acid, 2 h, then wash/recovery; FAC adds 5–30 µM iron to medium containing 5.6 ±1.3 µM total iron. cross_nutrient: true evidence_location: Figure 1a–b; treatment Methods [c-reg-mojic] Extracellular iron diminishes anticancer effects of vitamin C: an in vitro study. (2014). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25092529/ DOI: 10.1038/srep05955
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards