Component

Posterior tibial compound muscle action potential amplitude

Independent substance, clinical endpoint or measured readout; study context is retained with each finding.

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What acts on it

  1. The primary posterior tibial CMAP endpoint showed a mean difference of -0.2 mV (95% CI -0.8 to 0.3); secondary nerve-conduction and cognitive outcomes also showed no significant benefit.

    Experimental context and source evidence
    availability_state
    biomarker_context Imported condition classification; unverified.
    experimental_model
    Double-blind randomized trial: 201 adults aged at least 75 with B12 107–210 pmol/L, without anemia or relevant neurologic/cognitive signs; 191 had outcome assessment.
    exposure
    Oral cyanocobalamin 1 mg/day versus placebo for 12 months.
    limitations
    Null results have confidence limits; do not extrapolate to symptomatic deficiency.
    nutrient_topic
    Vitamin B12 research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · Vitamin B12 (cobalamins)
    organism
    Homo sapiens
    plain_language
    Improved B12-related markers did not translate into measured neurologic or cognitive improvement in this asymptomatic group.
    primary_references
    [b12-dangour2015] Effects of vitamin B-12 supplementation on neurologic and cognitive function in older people: a randomized controlled trial (2015). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26135351/ DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.115.110775
    tissue_or_cell_type
    Human blood or whole-person endpoints
    trigger_kind
    biomarker_context Imported condition classification; unverified.

    Vitamin B12: mechanisms, deficiency and nutrient interactions (2026-09-17) · lines 1524–1534

    AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Double-blind randomized trial: 201 adults aged at least 75 with B12 107–210 pmol/L, without anemia or relevant neurologic/cognitive signs; 191 had outcome assessment. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ### b12-dangour-neural-null The primary posterior tibial CMAP endpoint showed a mean difference of -0.2 mV (95% CI -0.8 to 0.3); secondary nerve-conduction and cognitive outcomes also showed no significant benefit. Condition category: biomarker_context nutrient_topic: Vitamin B12 research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: Improved B12-related markers did not translate into measured neurologic or cognitive improvement in this asymptomatic group. organism: Homo sapiens tissue_or_cell_type: Human blood or whole-person endpoints experimental_model: Double-blind randomized trial: 201 adults aged at least 75 with B12 107–210 pmol/L, without anemia or relevant neurologic/cognitive signs; 191 had outcome assessment. limitations: Null results have confidence limits; do not extrapolate to symptomatic deficiency. exposure: Oral cyanocobalamin 1 mg/day versus placebo for 12 months. [b12-dangour2015] Effects of vitamin B-12 supplementation on neurologic and cognitive function in older people: a randomized controlled trial (2015). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26135351/ DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.115.110775
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards