Component

Inflammatory lesions of papulopustular rosacea

Facial inflammatory lesion burden in moderate-to-severe disease.

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What acts on it

  1. Topical ivermectin 1% cream was an effective treatment for moderate-to-severe papulopustular rosacea and was more effective than topical metronidazole at twelve weeks, with a number needed to treat of 10.5.

    Experimental context and source evidence
    duration
    12 weeks, with extension to 36 weeks for relapse
    evidence_access
    Primary PubMed abstract and indexed metadata reviewed. Full-text method details not stated here remain unresolved.
    experimental_model
    Humans with moderate-to-severe papulopustular rosacea
    exposure
    Topical ivermectin 1% cream
    limitations
    Relapse after discontinuation was common in both arms, 62.7% with ivermectin and 68.4% with metronidazole by week 36, and ivermectin has only been tested in moderate-to-severe disease.
    organism
    Humans with moderate-to-severe papulopustular rosacea
    plain_language
    Topical ivermectin 1% cream was an effective treatment for moderate-to-severe papulopustular rosacea and was more effective than topical metronidazole at twelve weeks, with a number needed to treat of 10.5.
    primary_references
    Topical Ivermectin in the Treatment of Papulopustular Rosacea: A Systematic Review of Evidence and Clinical Guideline Recommendations. (2018). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29943217/ DOI: 10.1007/s13555-018-0249-y
    route
    Topical
    tissue
    Inflammatory facial lesions, with acaricidal activity against Demodex mites

    Ivermectin: mechanism of action across parasite, host barrier and mammalian targets (2026-09-22) · lines 233–242

    Original AI-assisted curation of sixteen primary studies resolved by PubMed title search and cross-checked against live PubMed metadata. Study-specific citations, concentrations, negative findings and limitations retained. Not publisher full text. · supports · · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ## ivermectin-rosacea-lesions Topical ivermectin 1% cream was an effective treatment for moderate-to-severe papulopustular rosacea and was more effective than topical metronidazole at twelve weeks, with a number needed to treat of 10.5. Model/species: Humans with moderate-to-severe papulopustular rosacea Tissue/system: Inflammatory facial lesions, with acaricidal activity against Demodex mites Exposure: Topical ivermectin 1% cream Route: Topical Duration: 12 weeks, with extension to 36 weeks for relapse Limits: Relapse after discontinuation was common in both arms, 62.7% with ivermectin and 68.4% with metronidazole by week 36, and ivermectin has only been tested in moderate-to-severe disease. Primary reference: Topical Ivermectin in the Treatment of Papulopustular Rosacea: A Systematic Review of Evidence and Clinical Guideline Recommendations. (2018). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29943217/ DOI: 10.1007/s13555-018-0249-y Access: Primary PubMed abstract and indexed metadata reviewed. Full-text method details not stated here remain unresolved.
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards