Component
Oxidative DNA damage in circulating lymphocytes measured by the comet assay
Oxidative DNA damage in circulating lymphocytes measured by the comet assay. Species, exposure and limitations are retained in each linked claim.
1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.
How nutrients influence it
Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.
Other things that act on it
Enzymes, hormones, genes, and other components with a recorded effect. These are not nutrients, so they do not count toward the arrows above. Each finding names the chapter that recorded it.
How nutrients reach it in more than one step
Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.
Tracing routes…
What it does
Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.
What acts on it
A single treatment caused clear and reproducible DNA damage in lymphocytes, found only after the first exposure and not after further treatments of the same individuals.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_span
- {"source_cache": "artifacts/hbot-research/11023535.abstract.txt", "locator": "Indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "19b770dff3d327e2dd6d49180686f9823624190ab5693c28b88adcfaf703f14d", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1576, "text_sha256": "19b770dff3d327e2dd6d49180686f9823624190ab5693c28b88adcfaf703f14d"}
- experimental_model
- Comet assay in lymphocytes of volunteers before and after hyperbaric oxygen, with enzyme expression measurement
- exposure
- 100% oxygen at 2.5 ATA for three 20-minute periods
- limitations
- A human exposure study with a within-subject design. The iron-sequestration explanation is the authors’ inference from the pattern of protection, not a direct measurement of free iron.
- nutrient_topic
- Hyperbaric oxygen research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct clinical effect, and a therapeutic exposure is not a dietary intake. · Hyperbaric oxygen therapy
- organism
- Human
- plain_language
- The first session damages DNA; later sessions do not.
- primary_references
- [hbot-p11023535] Induction of heme oxygenase-1 and adaptive protection against the induction of DNA damage after hyperbaric oxygen treatment. (2000). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11023535/ DOI: 10.1093/carcin/21.10.1795
- tissue_or_cell_type
- Circulating lymphocytes
Hyperbaric oxygen: the exposure, its reactive species, the signals they carry, and the nutrient-dependent enzymes that handle them (2026-09-19) · lines 283–294
AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Comet assay in lymphocytes of volunteers before and after hyperbaric oxygen, with enzyme expression measurement · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
### hbot-first-exposure-dna-damage A single treatment caused clear and reproducible DNA damage in lymphocytes, found only after the first exposure and not after further treatments of the same individuals. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Hyperbaric oxygen research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct clinical effect, and a therapeutic exposure is not a dietary intake. plain_language: The first session damages DNA; later sessions do not. organism: Human tissue_or_cell_type: Circulating lymphocytes experimental_model: Comet assay in lymphocytes of volunteers before and after hyperbaric oxygen, with enzyme expression measurement limitations: A human exposure study with a within-subject design. The iron-sequestration explanation is the authors’ inference from the pattern of protection, not a direct measurement of free iron. exposure: 100% oxygen at 2.5 ATA for three 20-minute periods evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/hbot-research/11023535.abstract.txt", "locator": "Indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "19b770dff3d327e2dd6d49180686f9823624190ab5693c28b88adcfaf703f14d", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1576, "text_sha256": "19b770dff3d327e2dd6d49180686f9823624190ab5693c28b88adcfaf703f14d"} [hbot-p11023535] Induction of heme oxygenase-1 and adaptive protection against the induction of DNA damage after hyperbaric oxygen treatment. (2000). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11023535/ DOI: 10.1093/carcin/21.10.1795
Complete structured claim and evidence
The events it takes part in
A mechanism often involves more than two components. These are the full events, with every participant and its role.
Situations it appears in
Low-supply and faulty-machinery situations recorded in the chapters where this component plays a part.
In the sources
Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.
Open hypotheses
Proposed ideas that involve this component. They are labeled as hypotheses and do not change any recorded statement.
This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.