Component
LDL cholesterol in garlic intervention trials
LDL cholesterol in garlic intervention trials. Interpret through the linked study species, preparation, exposure and measured endpoint.
3 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.
How nutrients influence it
Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.
Other things that act on it
Enzymes, hormones, genes, and other components with a recorded effect. These are not nutrients, so they do not count toward the arrows above. Each finding names the chapter that recorded it.
How nutrients reach it in more than one step
Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.
Tracing routes…
What it does
Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.
What acts on it
The aged-garlic-gardner-2007 intervention did not significantly improve LDL cholesterol in the six-month randomized trial.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Primary indexed abstract reviewed; full methods, exact concentrations or species-specific attribution remain unextracted unless explicitly stated in the abstract or separately verified publisher text.
- experimental_contrast
- {"intervention": "aged-garlic-gardner-2007", "comparator": "Placebo", "endpoint": "The aged-garlic-gardner-2007 intervention did not significantly improve LDL cholesterol in the six-month randomized trial.", "effect_direction": "no_detected_change", "combination": "single", "conditions": []} Explicit extracted experimental comparison; source-derived draft.
- experimental_model
- 192 adults randomized across four arms; clove-equivalent products six days/week for six months.
- interpretation_status
- Source-derived extraction of a fact-checked reference; access is explicit, not independent raw-data verification.
- limitations
- Preparation-specific human null; not an inference that isolated allicin inhibits or fails to inhibit every cholesterol enzyme.
- plain_language
- The aged-garlic-gardner-2007 intervention did not significantly improve LDL cholesterol in the six-month randomized trial.
- primary_references
- Effect of raw garlic vs commercial garlic supplements on plasma lipid concentrations in adults with moderate hypercholesterolemia: a randomized clinical trial. | 2007 | DOI 10.1001/archinte.167.4.346 | PMID 17325296 | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17325296/ | https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.167.4.346
- source_locator
- Reviewed reference lines 91-91; exact primary location described in quoted passage where extracted.
Allicin: detailed mechanisms of action (reviewed 5 October 2026) · lines 91–91
Original AI-assisted review of primary studies and, where relevant, official regulatory records. Access level is retained per claim. Corrections, null results and unresolved questions remain explicit. Not publisher full text or independent replication. · supports · 192 adults randomized across four arms; clove-equivalent products six days/week for six months. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
**Cholesterol null.** Gardner randomized 192 adults with moderately elevated LDL cholesterol to raw garlic, garlic powder, aged garlic extract, or placebo for six months. Products equivalent to roughly a four-gram clove were used six days per week and chemically monitored. None significantly improved LDL, HDL, triglycerides, or the total-cholesterol/HDL ratio. This substantial null result should remain visible beside biochemical enzyme findings. It neither disproves every possible formulation nor proves that all positive trials were publication bias. [Gardner 2007](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17325296/)
Complete structured claim and evidenceThe garlic-powder-gardner-2007 intervention did not significantly improve LDL cholesterol in the six-month randomized trial.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Primary indexed abstract reviewed; full methods, exact concentrations or species-specific attribution remain unextracted unless explicitly stated in the abstract or separately verified publisher text.
- experimental_contrast
- {"intervention": "garlic-powder-gardner-2007", "comparator": "Placebo", "endpoint": "The garlic-powder-gardner-2007 intervention did not significantly improve LDL cholesterol in the six-month randomized trial.", "effect_direction": "no_detected_change", "combination": "single", "conditions": []} Explicit extracted experimental comparison; source-derived draft.
- experimental_model
- 192 adults randomized across four arms; clove-equivalent products six days/week for six months.
- interpretation_status
- Source-derived extraction of a fact-checked reference; access is explicit, not independent raw-data verification.
- limitations
- Preparation-specific human null; not an inference that isolated allicin inhibits or fails to inhibit every cholesterol enzyme.
- plain_language
- The garlic-powder-gardner-2007 intervention did not significantly improve LDL cholesterol in the six-month randomized trial.
- primary_references
- Effect of raw garlic vs commercial garlic supplements on plasma lipid concentrations in adults with moderate hypercholesterolemia: a randomized clinical trial. | 2007 | DOI 10.1001/archinte.167.4.346 | PMID 17325296 | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17325296/ | https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.167.4.346
- source_locator
- Reviewed reference lines 91-91; exact primary location described in quoted passage where extracted.
Allicin: detailed mechanisms of action (reviewed 5 October 2026) · lines 91–91
Original AI-assisted review of primary studies and, where relevant, official regulatory records. Access level is retained per claim. Corrections, null results and unresolved questions remain explicit. Not publisher full text or independent replication. · supports · 192 adults randomized across four arms; clove-equivalent products six days/week for six months. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
**Cholesterol null.** Gardner randomized 192 adults with moderately elevated LDL cholesterol to raw garlic, garlic powder, aged garlic extract, or placebo for six months. Products equivalent to roughly a four-gram clove were used six days per week and chemically monitored. None significantly improved LDL, HDL, triglycerides, or the total-cholesterol/HDL ratio. This substantial null result should remain visible beside biochemical enzyme findings. It neither disproves every possible formulation nor proves that all positive trials were publication bias. [Gardner 2007](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17325296/)
Complete structured claim and evidenceThe raw-garlic-gardner-2007 intervention did not significantly improve LDL cholesterol in the six-month randomized trial.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_access
- Primary indexed abstract reviewed; full methods, exact concentrations or species-specific attribution remain unextracted unless explicitly stated in the abstract or separately verified publisher text.
- experimental_contrast
- {"intervention": "raw-garlic-gardner-2007", "comparator": "Placebo", "endpoint": "The raw-garlic-gardner-2007 intervention did not significantly improve LDL cholesterol in the six-month randomized trial.", "effect_direction": "no_detected_change", "combination": "single", "conditions": []} Explicit extracted experimental comparison; source-derived draft.
- experimental_model
- 192 adults randomized across four arms; clove-equivalent products six days/week for six months.
- interpretation_status
- Source-derived extraction of a fact-checked reference; access is explicit, not independent raw-data verification.
- limitations
- Preparation-specific human null; not an inference that isolated allicin inhibits or fails to inhibit every cholesterol enzyme.
- plain_language
- The raw-garlic-gardner-2007 intervention did not significantly improve LDL cholesterol in the six-month randomized trial.
- primary_references
- Effect of raw garlic vs commercial garlic supplements on plasma lipid concentrations in adults with moderate hypercholesterolemia: a randomized clinical trial. | 2007 | DOI 10.1001/archinte.167.4.346 | PMID 17325296 | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17325296/ | https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.167.4.346
- source_locator
- Reviewed reference lines 91-91; exact primary location described in quoted passage where extracted.
Allicin: detailed mechanisms of action (reviewed 5 October 2026) · lines 91–91
Original AI-assisted review of primary studies and, where relevant, official regulatory records. Access level is retained per claim. Corrections, null results and unresolved questions remain explicit. Not publisher full text or independent replication. · supports · 192 adults randomized across four arms; clove-equivalent products six days/week for six months. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
**Cholesterol null.** Gardner randomized 192 adults with moderately elevated LDL cholesterol to raw garlic, garlic powder, aged garlic extract, or placebo for six months. Products equivalent to roughly a four-gram clove were used six days per week and chemically monitored. None significantly improved LDL, HDL, triglycerides, or the total-cholesterol/HDL ratio. This substantial null result should remain visible beside biochemical enzyme findings. It neither disproves every possible formulation nor proves that all positive trials were publication bias. [Gardner 2007](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17325296/)
Complete structured claim and evidence
The events it takes part in
A mechanism often involves more than two components. These are the full events, with every participant and its role.
Situations it appears in
Low-supply and faulty-machinery situations recorded in the chapters where this component plays a part.
In the sources
Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.
Open hypotheses
Proposed ideas that involve this component. They are labeled as hypotheses and do not change any recorded statement.
This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.