Component

Symptom and activity-impact outcomes in the aged garlic trial

Symptom and activity-impact outcomes in the aged garlic trial. Interpret through the linked study species, preparation, exposure and measured endpoint.

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What acts on it

  1. Some symptom and activity-impact measures improved with aged garlic extract despite the null incidence comparison.

    Experimental context and source evidence
    evidence_access
    Primary indexed abstract reviewed; full methods, exact concentrations or species-specific attribution remain unextracted unless explicitly stated in the abstract or separately verified publisher text.
    experimental_contrast
    {"intervention": "Aged garlic extract", "comparator": "Placebo", "endpoint": "Some symptom and activity-impact measures improved with aged garlic extract despite the null incidence comparison.", "effect_direction": "decrease", "combination": "single", "conditions": []} Explicit extracted experimental comparison; source-derived draft.
    experimental_model
    Same 90-day randomized trial; symptom diary outcomes.
    interpretation_status
    Source-derived extraction of a fact-checked reference; access is explicit, not independent raw-data verification.
    limitations
    Multiple secondary symptom endpoints; not confirmed antiviral mechanism or allicin efficacy.
    plain_language
    Some symptom and activity-impact measures improved with aged garlic extract despite the null incidence comparison.
    primary_references
    Supplementation with aged garlic extract improves both NK and γδ-T cell function and reduces the severity of cold and flu symptoms: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled nutrition intervention. | 2012 | DOI 10.1016/j.clnu.2011.11.019 | PMID 22280901 | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22280901/ | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2011.11.019
    source_locator
    Reviewed reference lines 95-95; exact primary location described in quoted passage where extracted.

    Allicin: detailed mechanisms of action (reviewed 5 October 2026) · lines 95–95

    Original AI-assisted review of primary studies and, where relevant, official regulatory records. Access level is retained per claim. Corrections, null results and unresolved questions remain explicit. Not publisher full text or independent replication. · supports · Same 90-day randomized trial; symptom diary outcomes. · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    **Cold outcomes differ by preparation.** Josling's trial randomized 146 volunteers for twelve weeks and reported fewer diary-recorded colds with an allicin-containing supplement (24 versus 65 episodes). Nantz tested 2.56 g/day aged garlic extract in 120 participants: the ninety-day cold/flu incidence difference was not significant, although some symptom and activity-impact measures improved. At forty-five days, ex vivo γδ-T-cell and NK-cell proliferation also increased. These are different interventions and endpoints, not a replication of purified allicin efficacy. Neither proves that one specific compound caused the clinical effect. [Josling 2001](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11697022/) [Nantz 2012](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22280901/)
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.