Component

Cardiovascular risk markers in adults with diabetes

Species, preparation, dose and limitations are retained on linked claims.

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What acts on it

  1. In 68 adults with diabetes, 1050 mg/day bromelain for 12 weeks did not significantly improve fibrinogen, lipids, blood pressure, glucose, C-reactive protein, or anthropometric measures versus placebo.

    Experimental context and source evidence
    dose
    Bromelain 1050 mg/day
    duration
    12 weeks
    evidence_access
    Primary PubMed abstract and indexed metadata reviewed. Full-text method details not stated here remain unresolved.
    evidence_scope
    literature_reviewed; model-specific source-derived curation
    experimental_model
    Sixty-eight Chinese adults with diabetes and at least one cardiovascular risk factor
    limitations
    Baseline fibrinogen differed despite randomization; the result is a clinical null for the tested dose and population, not proof of no effect in every setting.
    nutrient_topic
    Bromelain chapter; interacting nutrients, drugs, peptides and proteins retain their experimental settings. · Bromelain
    organism
    Sixty-eight Chinese adults with diabetes and at least one cardiovascular risk factor
    plain_language
    In 68 adults with diabetes, 1050 mg/day bromelain for 12 weeks did not significantly improve fibrinogen, lipids, blood pressure, glucose, C-reactive protein, or anthropometric measures versus placebo.
    primary_references
    Bromelain and cardiovascular risk factors in diabetes: An exploratory randomized, placebo controlled, double blind clinical trial. (2016). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27412590/ DOI: 10.1007/s11655-016-2521-2
    route
    Oral
    tissue
    Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial

    Bromelain: mechanism of action and interactions (2026-09-20) · lines 132–141

    Original AI-assisted source-specific curation with primary-study citations, model, exposure, route, duration, negative findings and limitations preserved. Not publisher full text. · supports · Sixty-eight Chinese adults with diabetes and at least one cardiovascular risk factor · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ## bromelain-diabetes-rct-null In 68 adults with diabetes, 1050 mg/day bromelain for 12 weeks did not significantly improve fibrinogen, lipids, blood pressure, glucose, C-reactive protein, or anthropometric measures versus placebo. Model/species: Sixty-eight Chinese adults with diabetes and at least one cardiovascular risk factor Tissue/system: Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial Exposure: Bromelain 1050 mg/day Route: Oral Duration: 12 weeks Limits: Baseline fibrinogen differed despite randomization; the result is a clinical null for the tested dose and population, not proof of no effect in every setting. Primary reference: Bromelain and cardiovascular risk factors in diabetes: An exploratory randomized, placebo controlled, double blind clinical trial. (2016). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27412590/ DOI: 10.1007/s11655-016-2521-2 Access: Primary PubMed abstract and indexed metadata reviewed. Full-text method details not stated here remain unresolved.
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards