Component

Human colonic biopsy transepithelial electrical resistance

Human colonic biopsy transepithelial electrical resistance. Species, exposure and limitations are retained in each linked claim.

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What acts on it

  1. Colonic biopsy electrical resistance was not significantly changed.

    Experimental context and source evidence
    evidence_span
    {"source_cache": "artifacts/pectin-research/31324040.abstract.txt", "locator": "Primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "4794205aa64876bf788ee1195c9a68a69c3090a0d334eaf6fc2dbf201c02858e", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1425, "text_sha256": "4794205aa64876bf788ee1195c9a68a69c3090a0d334eaf6fc2dbf201c02858e"}
    experimental_model
    Randomized controlled feeding; 52 young and 48 older adults enrolled
    exposure
    15 g/day pectin versus placebo for four weeks
    limitations
    Same intervention cohort as PMID31547291; healthy baseline participants. A null result here does not settle disease-specific effects.
    nutrient_topic
    Pectin research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · Pectin, structurally heterogeneous plant polysaccharides
    organism
    Homo sapiens
    plain_language
    A second barrier measurement was also unchanged.
    primary_references
    [pectin-p31324040] The Impact of Pectin Supplementation on Intestinal Barrier Function in Healthy Young Adults and Healthy Elderly. (2019). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31324040/ DOI: 10.3390/nu11071554
    tissue_or_cell_type
    Intestinal sugar permeability probes and colonic biopsies

    Pectin: metabolism, signaling and nutrient connections (2026-09-17) · lines 1036–1047

    AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Randomized controlled feeding; 52 young and 48 older adults enrolled · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ### pectin-teer-null Colonic biopsy electrical resistance was not significantly changed. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Pectin research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: A second barrier measurement was also unchanged. organism: Homo sapiens tissue_or_cell_type: Intestinal sugar permeability probes and colonic biopsies experimental_model: Randomized controlled feeding; 52 young and 48 older adults enrolled limitations: Same intervention cohort as PMID31547291; healthy baseline participants. A null result here does not settle disease-specific effects. exposure: 15 g/day pectin versus placebo for four weeks evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/pectin-research/31324040.abstract.txt", "locator": "Primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "4794205aa64876bf788ee1195c9a68a69c3090a0d334eaf6fc2dbf201c02858e", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1425, "text_sha256": "4794205aa64876bf788ee1195c9a68a69c3090a0d334eaf6fc2dbf201c02858e"} [pectin-p31324040] The Impact of Pectin Supplementation on Intestinal Barrier Function in Healthy Young Adults and Healthy Elderly. (2019). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31324040/ DOI: 10.3390/nu11071554
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards