Component

Endogenous copper excretion

Endogenous copper excretion. Species, exposure and limitations are retained in each linked claim.

1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.

How nutrients influence it

Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.

How nutrients reach it in more than one step

Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.

Tracing routes…

What it does

Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.

Recorded relationships

What acts on it

  1. Endogenous copper losses increased from about 0.45 to 0.81 to 2.46 mg/day across the low, medium and high copper-intake conditions.

    Copper → Endogenous copper excretion source_derived_draftungraded
    Experimental context and source evidence
    evidence_span
    {"source_cache": "artifacts/copper-research/12844388.abstract.txt", "locator": "Exact primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "5b6c40ba96ca6bba0b6d377caf643f3aebba366919c889e2e8f10be4b23a0def", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1336, "text_sha256": "5b6c40ba96ca6bba0b6d377caf643f3aebba366919c889e2e8f10be4b23a0def"}
    experimental_model
    Controlled copper intake and stable-isotope balance study
    exposure
    Twelve men; 0.7, 1.6 or 6 mg/day intake periods with an oral 3 mg isotope challenge
    limitations
    The isotope challenge was the same at each dietary background. Similar fractional absorption under this test does not mean copper absorption is invariant at every dose.
    nutrient_topic
    Copper research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. · Copper
    organism
    Human men
    plain_language
    The body adjusted how much copper it removed.
    primary_references
    [copper-p12844388] Adaptive responses in men fed low- and high-copper diets. (2003). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12844388/ DOI: 10.1079/bjn2003887
    tissue_or_cell_type
    Whole-body copper handling

    Copper: transport, cuproenzymes, deficiency, excess and nutrient interactions (2026-09-17) · lines 1365–1376

    AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Controlled copper intake and stable-isotope balance study · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft

    ### copper-copper-excretion-adaptation Endogenous copper losses increased from about 0.45 to 0.81 to 2.46 mg/day across the low, medium and high copper-intake conditions. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Copper research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct dietary effect. plain_language: The body adjusted how much copper it removed. organism: Human men tissue_or_cell_type: Whole-body copper handling experimental_model: Controlled copper intake and stable-isotope balance study limitations: The isotope challenge was the same at each dietary background. Similar fractional absorption under this test does not mean copper absorption is invariant at every dose. exposure: Twelve men; 0.7, 1.6 or 6 mg/day intake periods with an oral 3 mg isotope challenge evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/copper-research/12844388.abstract.txt", "locator": "Exact primary indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "5b6c40ba96ca6bba0b6d377caf643f3aebba366919c889e2e8f10be4b23a0def", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1336, "text_sha256": "5b6c40ba96ca6bba0b6d377caf643f3aebba366919c889e2e8f10be4b23a0def"} [copper-p12844388] Adaptive responses in men fed low- and high-copper diets. (2003). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12844388/ DOI: 10.1079/bjn2003887
    Complete structured claim and evidence

In the sources

Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.

    This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.

    Evidence, AI assistance and curation standards