Component
Differentiation of rat embryo midbrain and limb bud cells in micromass culture
Differentiation of rat embryo midbrain and limb bud cells in micromass culture. Species, exposure and limitations are retained in each linked claim.
1 recorded relationships. Experimental role, claim status and evidence remain attached to each record.
How nutrients influence it
Every nutrient with a recorded effect on this component, credited to the nutrient that acted rather than the chapter that recorded it. Open a nutrient to see the findings and the conditions they were measured under.
Other things that act on it
Enzymes, hormones, genes, and other components with a recorded effect. These are not nutrients, so they do not count toward the arrows above. Each finding names the chapter that recorded it.
How nutrients reach it in more than one step
Chains of two or more recorded steps that end here, grouped by the nutrient they start from. Each step is a separate finding, so a chain is a route a mechanism could take, not proof that it does.
Tracing routes…
What it does
Every recorded relationship this component is part of, grouped by its role. Plain wording comes first; the technical statement follows.
What acts on it
The relative potencies of the benzimidazole analogs in rat embryo micromass culture, nocodazole greater than mebendazole approximately equal to albendazole much greater than thiabendazole, mirrored their effectiveness in an assay for in vitro inhibition of mammalian tubulin polymerization, immunofluorescent staining with a monoclonal antibody to beta-tubulin revealed that these agents elicited mitotic arrest, and with the exception of thiabendazole these agents should be considered potential developmental toxicants since they inhibit cell growth and differentiation at nanomolar concentrations.
Experimental context and source evidence
- evidence_span
- {"source_cache": "artifacts/mebendazole-research/1553749.abstract.txt", "locator": "Indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "4c8ca680cbc4ebd8441d3d8c083a98587c81141280e9fa61388751264f1ea2ac", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1384, "text_sha256": "4c8ca680cbc4ebd8441d3d8c083a98587c81141280e9fa61388751264f1ea2ac"}
- experimental_model
- Rat embryo midbrain and limb bud micromass cultures assessed for differentiation and cytotoxicity
- exposure
- Mebendazole, thiabendazole, nocodazole and colchicine, compared with albendazole
- limitations
- An in vitro developmental toxicity screen. It links the effect to the mammalian tubulin binding directly, by showing the potency order matches; it is not a pregnancy outcome.
- nutrient_topic
- Mebendazole research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct clinical effect, and mebendazole is recorded separately from albendazole, from the benzimidazole class and from its own crystal forms. · Mebendazole
- organism
- Rat
- plain_language
- The very property that makes it a cancer drug candidate is the property that makes it a suspected developmental toxin.
- primary_references
- [mbz-p1553749] Effects of benzimidazole analogs on cultures of differentiating rodent embryonic cells. (1992). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1553749/ DOI: 10.1016/0041-008x(92)90019-o
- tissue_or_cell_type
- Embryonic midbrain and limb bud cells
AI-assisted literature curation; primary study URLs and scope retained in the document and extraction. Not publisher full text. · supports · Rat embryo midbrain and limb bud micromass cultures assessed for differentiation and cytotoxicity · source_derived_draft · unverified_draft
### mbz-developmental-toxicity-is-the-same-target The relative potencies of the benzimidazole analogs in rat embryo micromass culture, nocodazole greater than mebendazole approximately equal to albendazole much greater than thiabendazole, mirrored their effectiveness in an assay for in vitro inhibition of mammalian tubulin polymerization, immunofluorescent staining with a monoclonal antibody to beta-tubulin revealed that these agents elicited mitotic arrest, and with the exception of thiabendazole these agents should be considered potential developmental toxicants since they inhibit cell growth and differentiation at nanomolar concentrations. Condition category: normal nutrient_topic: Mebendazole research collection; topical membership is not evidence of a direct clinical effect, and mebendazole is recorded separately from albendazole, from the benzimidazole class and from its own crystal forms. plain_language: The very property that makes it a cancer drug candidate is the property that makes it a suspected developmental toxin. organism: Rat tissue_or_cell_type: Embryonic midbrain and limb bud cells experimental_model: Rat embryo midbrain and limb bud micromass cultures assessed for differentiation and cytotoxicity limitations: An in vitro developmental toxicity screen. It links the effect to the mammalian tubulin binding directly, by showing the potency order matches; it is not a pregnancy outcome. exposure: Mebendazole, thiabendazole, nocodazole and colchicine, compared with albendazole evidence_span: {"source_cache": "artifacts/mebendazole-research/1553749.abstract.txt", "locator": "Indexed abstract; zero-based, end-exclusive Unicode character offsets", "file_sha256": "4c8ca680cbc4ebd8441d3d8c083a98587c81141280e9fa61388751264f1ea2ac", "start_char": 0, "end_char": 1384, "text_sha256": "4c8ca680cbc4ebd8441d3d8c083a98587c81141280e9fa61388751264f1ea2ac"} [mbz-p1553749] Effects of benzimidazole analogs on cultures of differentiating rodent embryonic cells. (1992). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1553749/ DOI: 10.1016/0041-008x(92)90019-o
Complete structured claim and evidence
The events it takes part in
A mechanism often involves more than two components. These are the full events, with every participant and its role.
Situations it appears in
Low-supply and faulty-machinery situations recorded in the chapters where this component plays a part.
In the sources
Preserved passages that mention this component, quoted exactly. Open one to read it in context.
Open hypotheses
Proposed ideas that involve this component. They are labeled as hypotheses and do not change any recorded statement.
This is a research prototype built from draft material. It is not medical advice, and its statements still await verification against the original studies.